§  What's New  ||  Search   ||  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §

 
 
 
 

 

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8g529uo9qdbt4k4q48r67p4ufts27e9kq1% 404ax.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain

From: Caroline Letkeman <carolinel@telus.net>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Suppressive Person Declare: Caroline Letkeman
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:28:42 -0800
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 414
Message-ID: <8g529uo9qdbt4k4q48r67p4ufts27e9kq1@4ax.com>
References: <i5nn7usuo927ia32no83hgrjqmi7nnvt5h@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.12
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.232.125.58
X-Original-Trace: 14 Mar 2002 16:28:18 -0500, 216.232.125.58


On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:06:28 -0800, Caroline Letkeman
<carolinel@telus.net> wrote:

><images on a.b.s. >
>
>This Suppressive Person Declare is printed on legal-sized goldenrod
>paper, hence the colloquial term for this kind of publication:
>"Goldenrod."
>
>Caroline Letkeman
>
>---start paste---
>
>CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
>FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION
>
>FLB ETHICS ORDER 1448
>5 February 2002
>
>ALL ORGS
>ALL MISSIONS
>
>_SUPPRESSIVE PERSON DECLARE_
>CAROLINE LETKEMAN
>
>Caroline Letkeman, of Chilliwack, British Columbia, is hereby declared
>a Suppressive Person.
>
>Caroline Letkeman, in November 2001, formally resigned from the Church
>of Scientology by means of a public declaration. In addition to this,
>she demanded full refund of all funds donated to the Church.

"Oh, we don't intend to actually *honor* your refund demand, but here,
take an SP declare."

>In the year 2000, Caroline wrote an essay against Scientology which
>contained defamatory statements and black propaganda; this was written
>for a known suppressive group and was published through a broad
>communication medium.

The above is an example of how scn covers up their fair game against
me.

I wrote Scientology Soul Hackers under the alias "antivirus."
Scientology did not respect my right to privacy, but instead committed
resources and personnel to determine its author. Six weeks after the
essay was posted to the Internet, an a.r.s. poster with the handle
"AJ," posted my name to a.r.s. and outed me.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=REPOST-93mh370n6o% 40drn.newsguy.com&output=gplain

Further, with absolutely zero respect for me or my family, scn
retaliated by telling my daughter lies about me and by forcing her to
disconnect. I have not heard from Annie since April, 2001.

AJ, whoever that person is, obviously still enjoys the privacy that
s/he took away from me.

Affidavit here:
http://www.entheta.ca/caroline/dec1.html

Original essay here:
[http: //www.entheta.ca/caroline/soulhackers.html]

>Attempts have been made by Church staff to assist Caroline to come to
>her senses, however, she refused these efforts to help her and has
>continued to commit suppressive acts.

This is a lie. Scientology has never made attempts "to assist
Caroline to come to her senses." After she and/or her juniors
libeled and slandered me to my daughter, and got her to disconnect
from me, Cara Golashesky, FLB "Justice" Chief, demanded my
confession, meaning that I was now to write up all my "crimes" and
"high crimes" against scn and submit them to OSA via her. This is
not an effort to help. This is an undisguised order to help scn fair
game me some more.

>
>In HCO PL 23 Dec 1965RB SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY
>AND SCIENTOLOGISTS, LRH states: " A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON or GROUP is one
>that actively seeks to suppress or damage Scientology or a
>Scientologist by suppressive acts."

I don't have the RB version. What I have is this:

HCO PL 23 December 1965 ETHICS SUPPRESSIVE ACTS SUPPRESSION OF
SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS THE FAIR GAME LAW <sic> by L. Ron
Hubbard © 1965 L. Ron Hubbard

<start fair use quote>

A Suppressive Person or Group becomes "fair game."
By FAIR GAME is meant, may not be further protected by the codes and
disciplines of Scientology or the rights of a Scientologist.

[...]

(Note: See HCO P/L 21 October 1968 Cancellation of Fair Game, and HCO
P/L 15 November 1968 which removes disconnection as a condition, on
page 489.) <sic>

<end quote>

Here is the policy letter that cancels openly *declaring* that SPs are
fair game.

HCO PL 21 October 1968 CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME © 1968 L. Ron
Hubbard:

<start fair use quote>

CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME

The practice of declaring people FAIR GAME will cease. FAIR GAME may
not appear on any Ethics Order. It causes bad public relations.

This P/L does not cancel any policy on the treatment or handling of an
SP.

<end quote>

Thus when Hubbard ceased the practice of writing "FAIR GAME" on the
"ethics orders" he was having his cult publish on his fair game
targets, he actually made fair game more demonic, since it became
completely covert. It must be remembered that all of Scientology's
fair game against people such as Paulette Cooper, Mike Flynn, Gerry
Armstrong or Bob Minton is *after* Hubbard issued this "cancellation."

The only difference between Scientology fair game then and Scientology
fair game today is that today's fair game is more covert and more
deadly.

This " cancellation" of fair game by Hubbard is one of the clearest
statements of Hubbard's frightfully evil intentions.

Since he ordered that the "treatment or handling" of SPs was not
altered in any way by the cessation of putting the words "fair game"
on "ethics orders," it must be the same today. Since it is the
"treatment or handling" of SPs which *is* the fair game, not some
words appearing on a piece of paper, it is clear that every
Scientologist endorses, supports and practices FAIR GAME until this
very day.

HCO PL 15 November 1968 CANCELLATION OF DISCONNECTION © 1968 L. Ron
Hubbard:

<start fair use quote>

CANCELLATION OF DISCONNECTION

Since we can now handle all types of cases disconnection as a
condition is cancelled.

<end quote>

Disconnection was reinstated with

HCOB 10 September 1983 PTSness AND
DISCONNECTION © 1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library. From that HCOB:

<start fair use quote>

LOST TECH

Earlier, disconnection as a condition was cancelled. It had been
abused by a few individuals who'd failed to handle situations which
could have been handled and who lazily or criminally disconnected,
thereby creating situations even worse than the original because it
was a wrong action.

Secondly, there were those who could survive only by living on our
lines--they wanted to continue to be connected to Scientologists (see
the HCOBs on the characteristics of an SP). Thus, they screamed to
high heaven if anyone dared to apply the tech of "handle or
disconnect."

This put Scientologists at a disadvantage.

We cannot afford to deny Scientologists that basic freedom that is
granted to everyone else: the right to choose whom one wishes to
communicate with or not communicate with. It's bad enough that there
are governments trying, through the use of force, to prevent people
from disconnecting from them (witness those who want to leave Russia
but can't!).

The bare fact is that disconnection is a vital tool in handling
PTSness and can be very effective when used correctly.

Therefore the tech of disconnection is hereby restored to use, in the
hands of those persons thoroughly and standardly trained in PTS/SP
tech.

<end quote>

Net result: Both disconnection and fair game are in use. But by
policy, it is not allowed to announce that you are fair gaming the
fair game. It is, however, acceptable to tell acceptable truths about
fair gaming, which is just more fair game.

When Hubbard, or Miscavige, or the cabal which wrote this HCOB says
that Scientology cannot afford to deny Scientologists that basic
freedom that is granted to everyone else, the right to choose whom one
wishes to communicate with or not communicate with, he and they are
lying completely. Denying Scientologists this basic freedom that is
granted to everyone else is exactly what they're doing. Denying
Scientologists the right to choose whom they wish to communicate with
or not communicate with is exactly what Hubbard, DM and Scientology
are doing. Not only can the people running Scientology afford to deny
Scientologists that basic freedom that is granted to everyone else,
the people running Scientology want the suppression they purchase to
*be* Scientology.

All Scientologists support their own suppression, the denial of their
basic freedom that is granted to everyone else. They argue, of course,
that their "choice" to be denied the basic freedom that is granted to
everyone else (wogs ® of course) makes the Scientologists more free.
Their decision to be suppressed makes them "free." That's Scientology.

The 1983 reinstitution of disconnection, which in truth had never been
cancelled as a condition, makes it very clear that Hubbard's reason
for the 1968 "cancellation" is utter hogwash: "Since we can now handle
all types of cases disconnection as a condition is cancelled."
What...did Scientology between 1968 and 1983 degenerate so much,
become so degraded that its tech no longer handled all types of cases?
No, it always degraded, never could handle all, or even any, types of
cases, and Hubbard was a gargantuan liar. Scientology is all about and
always all about disconnection, fair game and other atrocities.
"Handling cases" is a cover for the real Scientology evils, which
really do work.

From HCO PL 13 August 1970 PR Series 2 THE MISSING INGREDIENT © 1983
L. Ron Hubbard

<start fair use quote>

Handling truth is a touchy business also. You don't have to tell
everything you know--that would jam the comm line too. Tell an
*acceptable truth*. [italicized in original text.]

Agreement with one's message is what PR is seeking to achieve. Thus
the message must compare to the personal experience of the audience.

So PR becomes the technique of communicating an acceptable truth--and
which will attain the desirable result.

If there's no chance of obtaining a desirable result and the truth
would injure, then talk about something else.

<end quote>

Cara Golasheshsky found exactly nothing in what I did that constituted
criminal or insane actions. Since, however, her Scientology bosses
say I am insane because I have voiced critical thoughts about scn,
Cara is forced to tell acceptable truths, i.e., lies, about me, or she
would herself be the target of fair game by her seniors.

>
>Caroline has committed the following suppressive acts as listed in HCO
>PL 23 December 1965RB SUPPRESSIVE ACTS, SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND
>SCIENTOLOGISTS:
>
>1. VIOLATION OR NEGLECT OF ANY OF THE TEN POINTS OF KEEPING
>SCIENTOLOGY WORKING.

This is itself a suppressive generality and a cop-out.

Am I an SP because

1. I didn't have or I neglected the technology?
2. I didn't know the technology?
3. I didn't know the technology is correct?
4. I didn't teach the correct technology correctly?
5. I didn't apply the technology?
6. I didn't see that the technology was correctly applied?
7. I didn't hammer out of existence incorrect technology?
8. I didn't knock out incorrect applications?
9. I didn't close the door on any possibility of incorrect
technology?
10. I didn't close the door on incorrect application?

What about the fact I don't find Cara's lies acceptable? That means
she is not successfully telling acceptable truths. Thus she herself
is guilty of violating one or more points of KSW and is herself SP.

Since the " technology" is not correct, no Scientologist can possibly
know it's correct, and every Scientologist is committing continuous
suppressive acts.

Since scn does not have the correct technology it cannot possibly
teach the correct technology, the cult is committing continuous
suppressive acts.

And indeed, by its own definitions, Scientology is a most suppressive
group, which should be treated and handled by the Scientologists (if
they were not so completely cowed by all the SPs they are) as Hubbard
orders. Scientologists confirm their suppressive natures by
continually violating KSW with their utter neglect in fair gaming the
suppressive group to which they belong.

>2. PUBLIC DISAVOWAL OF SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS IN GOOD STANDING
>WITH SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS.

By this definition, any critic who speaks out against scn is an SP.

>3. PUBLIC STATEMENTS AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS BUT NOT TO
>COMMITTEES OF EVIDENCE DULY CONVENED.

Cara Golashesky is the Flag Land Base **Justice** Chief, who, as part
of her job duties, declares people SPs, or really, fair game. She is
also in charge of overseeing the internal court system at the FLB,
which includes committees of evidence. If there are any critical
statements against scn, whether true or false, scn insists that they
be stated within scn's private system, or the people making such
statements are declared. But if Scientologists comply, and yet stick
to their criticisms, they'll get declared anyway under the high crime
" VIOLATION OR NEGLECT OF ANY OF THE TEN POINTS OF KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY
WORKING." There is no way to heal scn from the inside.

>4. DEMANDING THE RETURN OF ANY OR ALL FEES PAID FOR STANDARD TRAINING
>OR PROCESSING ACTUALLY RECEIVED OR RECEIVED IN PART AND STILL
>AVAILABLE BUT UNDELIVERED ONLY BECAUSE OF DEPARTURE OF THE PERSON
>DEMANDING.

Note the word FEES, which is an admission that the money I paid to scn
is not "donations."

>
>Any certificates and awards issued to Caroline Letkeman are hereby
>canceled. Any trademark licenses, for Dianetics and Scientology marks,
>she may have signed are canceled.

Funny how someone can go "unClear" or "un OT" in the absence of the
cert. Clear and OT must be worth exactly as much as the paper they
are printed on.

>It is hoped that Caroline comes to her senses and recants. She may
>follow steps A-E as covered in HCO PL 23 December 1965RB SUPPRESSIVE
>ACTS, SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS.
>
>Her only terminal is the International Justice Chief via the
>Continental Justice Chief.

Incorrect. Cara Golasheshsky and her senior, the IJC, are not
terminals. They are programmed liars. Thankfully God provides me
with exactly as many "terminals" as I need, which cannot be limited by
Hubbard, DM, Cara or any other Scientology gasbag.

A-E is a formula that supposedly "handles" SPs.

HCO PL 23 December 1965 ETHICS SUPPRESSIVE ACTS SUPPRESSION OF
SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS THE FAIR GAME LAW <sic> by L. Ron
Hubbard © 1965, 1976 L. Ron Hubbard

<start fair use quote>

If a person or a group that has committed a Suppressive Act comes to
his, her or their senses and recants, the HCO Secretary :

A. Tells the person or group to stop committing present time overts
and to cease all attacks and suppressions so he, she or they can get a
case gain;
B. Requires a public announcement to the effect that they realize
their actions were ignorant and unfounded and stating where possible
the influences or motivations which caused them to attempt to suppress
or attack Scientology; gets it signed before witnesses and published
broadly, particularly to persons directly influenced or formerly
associated with the former offender or offenders. The letter should
be calculated to expose any conspiracy to suppress Scientology or the
preclear or Scientologist if such existed;

B (1). Requires that all debts owed to Scientology organizations are
paid off;

C. Requires training beginning at HAS [Hubbard Apprentice
Scientologist--a beginning TRs or Comm Course] at their own expense if
Division 4 (Training and Processing) will have the person or the group
members;

D. Makes a note of the matter with copies of the statement and files
in the Ethics files;

E. Informs the Chairman at Saint Hill and forwards a duplicate of the
original copy which shows signatures.

<end quote>

>Unpublished work: © 2002 CSFSO, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>
>---page break---
>
>FLB Justice Chief
>
>for
>CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
>FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION
>
>Approved by
>INT JUSTICE CHIEF
>
>CSFSO:ME:CG:cl
>
>Grateful acknowledgement is made to L. Ron Hubbard Library for
>permission to reproduce a selection from the copyrighted works of L.
>Ron Hubbard. SCIENTOLOGY, DIANETICS and HCO are trademarks and
>service marks owned by the Religious Technology Center and are used
>with its permission. SCIENTOLOGIST is a collective membership mark
>designating members of the affiliated churches and missions of
>Scientology. Services relating to the Scientology religion are
>ministered throughout the world exclusively by the licensees of the
>Church of Scientology International with the permission of Religious
>Technology Center, holder of the SCIENTOLOGY and DIANETICS trademarks.
>Printed in U.S.A.
>
>---end---

Posted Under Fair Use and In the Public Interest

 

 
 

Thread

 

 

§  What's New  ||  Search   ||  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §