From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Gerry Armstrong and his Affirmations – An analysis
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:15:37 -0800

From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: de.soc.weltanschauung.scientology,alt.religion.scientology, alt.clearing.technology
Subject: For Sharky and All Scientologists Everywhere (was: Scientology Vulture Ministers Scamming Stuttgart)
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:46:39 +0200
Message-ID: <s3d9kvgl1j9mva5o386iniavrfrahr1pu4@4ax.com>
References: <a3pnjv8g0c7b185d977ie1u3coa9g3pfnj@4ax.com> <8e85ef7e.0308151838.3af47897@posting.google.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.228.181.182
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.228.181.182
X-Trace: 21 Aug 2003 08:46:54 -0400, 217.228.181.182
X-Original-Trace: 21 Aug 2003 08:46:54 -0400, 217.228.181.182
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 524
Path: news2.lightlink.com
Xref: news2.lightlink.com de.soc.weltanschauung.scientology:98888 alt.religion.scientology:1634831 alt.clearing.technology:200917

On 15 Aug 2003 19:38:26 -0700, sharky818@yahoo.com (Sharky) wrote:

>Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in message news: <a3pnjv8g0c7b185d977ie1u3coa9g3pfnj@4ax.com>…
>> Webbed with photos on our just beginning Vulture Minister® Program
>> section: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/vm/index.html
>>
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/vm/stuttgart-report-2003-07-30.html
>>
>
>I suggest you move your sad behind back to CA and take care of your
>open arrest warrant.

Thank you. I am very grateful to have the opportunity to engage a
Scientology operative on this subject.

You see, the fact that you and your fellow OSA or Scientology
personnel assert that your warrants for my arrest — and the
injunction, judgment and contempt orders that lead to the warrants –
are lawful, and that therefore I should “take care” of them, shows
your participation in a U.S. Federal crime, specifically 18 USC § 242.
I have already discussed in a number of places your cult’s and your
fellow cultists’ participation in 18 USC § 241, but § 242 requires a
little elucidation.

As you know, your cult’s warrants, and the injunction, contempts,
etc., are the product of your use of the law to enforce the 1986
“settlement” “contract” that you all claim you have with me.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/mutual-release-1986.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/mutual-release-1986-de.html
The “contract,” injunction, judgment, contempts and warrants are what
millions of dollars of Scientologists’ fees buy, right?

I signed this ridiculous “contract,” as I’ve testified many times,
because of three main factors: duress, fraud, and vision. Simply, the
duress was the threat that, if I didn’t sign, my lawyer and his
family, all the other participants in the “settlement” and their
families, countless other wogs®, and myself, would continue to be fair
gamed by your cult.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/scientology-fair-games-flynn.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/flynn-clients-settlement- agreement.html

Simply too, the fraud was the promise that, if I did sign, your cult
would end fair game forever against my lawyer and his family, all the
other participants in the “settlement” and their families, all other
wogs®, and myself. Since fair game did not end, your cult’s promise,
as an inducement to get me to sign, was fraudulent.

The vision was that your cult’s promise to end fair game was false;
that the “contract” was itself an instrument of fair game; that by
fair gaming my lawyer, your cult had in essence made him an agent of
fair game against me; and that sooner or later I would again find
myself in a pitched battle with your cult.

I possessed, of course, a great amount of knowledge and experience
that — to me at least — made my vision at the time of the
“settlement,” not even minutely preposterous. I had been in your cult
for over twelve years, worked with Hubbard, been in legal and intel,
done the RPF twice, done the research for Hubbard’s biography, and
discovered the lies he told in such profusion and prodigiousness that
he was judicially and properly pronounced a pathological liar.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/breckenridge- decision.html#fairgame

I had been fair gamed for five years after leaving your cult, which
included being assaulted, terrorized on the freeway, framed with
“crimes,” and threatened with assassination. And, very significantly,
when presented with this obscene and impossible “settlement”
“contract,” I was told by my lawyer that the very conditions your cult
has now spent millions trying to enforce were not worth the paper they
were printed on, and that I couldn’t sign away my Constitutional
rights. All of this, and more, provided grounding for my vision.

As you well know, it was a vision that was borne out almost as soon as
the ink was dry on your “contract.” Your fellow cultists immediately
began to fair game me in clear violation of the spirit, and, I would
argue, the letter of the “contract.” In fact they fair gamed me
before the ink was dry because, as my vision showed me, the
“contract” was itself a fair game mechanism, and getting me to sign it
was a fair game act.

That the “contract” is an instrument of fair game is also demonstrated
by the interpretation you and every other “beneficiary” give to it.
You all claim that it is a license to fair game me. You all claim
that by your “contract” each of you can fair game me, and that I am
prohibited, by your fair game license, from responding. If I do
respond, you all claim, your “contract” licenses you to further fair
game me, including by having me hunted down, fined and jailed.

There is no way you can argue — except in Scientological pretended
stupidity — that you are not a “beneficiary” of your cult’s
“contract.” The “beneficiaries” include every Scientology and
Scientology affiliated organization and entity and all their officers,
agents, representatives, employees, volunteers, directors, successors,
assigns and lawyers. That means every WISE company is a “beneficiary, ”
and all of their officers, agents, representatives, employees,
volunteers, directors, successors, assigns and lawyers. It means
every Narconon, every Criminon, every CCHR, every Applied Scholastics,
every $cientology school, every office of every front group of every
kind. It even means every volunteer minister (or vulture minister®,
really).
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/vm/index.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/vm/stuttgart-report-2003-07-30.html
And it certainly means that you, the Scientology cult’s “Sharky” op,
are a “beneficiary.”

You are a “beneficiary” of a “contract” to fair game me.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/index.html
You are bound by this “contract” to fair game me. Every person who
volunteers for your cult becomes, by “contract,” a ” beneficiary” and a
participant in fair game. Every person hired by every WISE company
immediately becomes, by “contract,” a participant in the fair game
campaign against me.

This insane and cruel circumstance is paradoxically a fabulous ” bonus”
that went well beyond the vision I had at the time of the
“settlement.” By being willing to be fair gamed at that moment, I have
demonstrated that fair game is Scientology-wide and continues
unabated. My life demonstrates that fair game is a contract that every
Scientologist enters into just by volunteering at any org or
affiliated entity. Your “contract” proves beyond argument that fair
game is a common denominator among virtually all Scientologists, and
among all your cult’s agents and lawyers. They are all contracted to
fair game me, and they all seek the “benefits” that fair gaming me
gives them.

Further confirming and solidifying this conclusion is the astounding
fact that since 1990 when the California Court of Appeal made your
fair game “contract” publicly available, not one ” beneficiary” of that
fair game has refused to participate, or repudiated the “benefits,” or
even criticized the “contract.” I have done whatever I reasonably
could to expose the “contract” and bring it to every Scientologist’s
attention. Not one “beneficiary” has objected to the “contract.”
Therefore it can be stated as fact that without fair game a person
cannot even do volunteer work for your cult, and that Scientology is
inseparable from fair game.

Another Godsent “bonus” that I didn’t see at the time of the
“settlement” is that this “contract,” more clearly than any other
document, demonstrates that your “creed” is pure crud. Your ” contract”
demonstrates that virtually every Scientologist is a hypocrite, and
that hypocrisy is senior to your “creed.” Can you imagine the value of
such a proof to a country, or a group or even a person opposing your
cult, or weighing information about Scientology in order to make an
informed decision? It is extremely valuable to know that virtually
every Scientologist is a bald-faced liar, and that all of you put fair
game above your own “creed.” What a gift your “contract” is to people
who still value honesty.

You hypocrites even put your “creed” in your by-laws.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/bylaws-csi.html

[Quote]

The Church subscribes, and its object is and purposes are that all of
Mankind may subscribe to and practice the following Creed:

“WE OF THE CHURCH BELIEVE:
…..
That all men have inalienable rights to their own religious practices
and their performance.
That all men have inalienable rights to their own lives.
That all men have inalienable rights to their sanity.
That all men have inalienable rights to their own defense.
That all men have inalienable rights to conceive, choose, assist and
support their own organizations, churches and governments.
That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely,
to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write
upon the opinions of others.
…..
And that no agency less than God has the power to suspend or set aside
these rights, overtly or covertly.

[End Quote]

But it’s far worse than even that. You all used your claimed
subscription to your “creed” to obtain tax exemption in the U.S. The
obvious message Scientology and Scientologists convey to every U.S.
citizen and every U.S. corporation or company is that “lies work.”
“Hypocrisy works!” If you want tax exemption in the U.S., well then
lie! Wait until the whole U.S. population, and the I.R.S., has that
cognition.

Your “contract” demonstrates that everything I have quoted here from
your “creed” for virtually every Scientologist is an active, willful
lie. Virtually every Scientologist, as a “beneficiary” of your
“contract,” is bound to violate your “creed.”

And again, in going on seventeen years, not one “beneficiary” has come
forward to repudiate the conditions of this “contract” that bind all
“beneficiaries” to knowingly and causatively violate your own ” creed.”
This is because violating the “creed” is more valuable to virtually
all Scientologists than subscribing to it. In fact, it can be shown
that living hypocritically, violating their “creed,” and fair gaming
good people — which “creed” violations necessarily entail — is what
Scientology means by “being OT.”

You have here a golden opportunity, Mr. Waterkamp. You can yourself
refuse to participate in fair game. You can yourself stop violating
your “creed.” Just state that you no longer wish to be a beneficiary
of your cult’s fair game, “creed”-violating “contract” with Gerry
Armstrong. The same golden opportunity is here for every other
Scientologist or Scientology agent or lawyer. Simply state that you
reject any “benefits” you might be “due” by this ” contract” and that
you no longer wish to be a “beneficiary.”

There is yet another huge benefit — to me and to everyone opposing
your cult — from your “contract” and your efforts to enforce it, that
I have seen clearly only very recently. You are all in continuing
violation of 18 USC § 241, which states:

[Quote]

CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United
States, or because of his having so exercised the same;…
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten
years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in
violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an
attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or
both, or may be sentenced to death.
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/241fin.htm

[End Quote]

I include here the part about “death result[ing] from the acts
committed in violation of this section” because of that very real
possibility and threat. After all, if every Scientology organization
and entity and every Scientology-affiliated organization and entity
and all their officers, agents, representatives, employees,
volunteers, directors, successors, assigns and lawyers, are willing,
anxious, slaving and paying to commit a crime which — without their
target’s death — is punishable with up to ten years imprisonment,
isn’t it reasonable to assume that a significant percentage of all
those organizations, entities and individuals are ready, willing, and
planning — and even ready to pay great sums — to assassinate the
target who threatens them with ten years in federal prison, because of
their thus far unsuccessful non-lethal attacks? Only an idiot as the
target in that circumstance would not cognite — or not consider the
vision — that his attackers want his death, and that some of them
would pay great sums — from their war chest of other people’s money
– for his assassination.

In that your cult, and you and all your fellow cultists, assert that
what you are all doing with your efforts to enforce your fair game
silence “contract,” and your black PR based on my refusal to be fair
gamed into silence; e.g.,
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong1.html
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong2.html
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong3.html
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong_docs.html
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/judmnt_1.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/judmnt_2.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/judmnt_3.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont1_1.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont1_2.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont1_3.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/bench1_1.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/bench1_2.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont2_1.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont2_2.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont2_3.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont2_4.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont2_5.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/bench2_1.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/bench2_2.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont3_1.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont3_2.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont3_3.jpg
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/armstrong/cont3_3.jpg
is all lawful, and done under the color of U.S. law, all of your
actions are in violation of 18 USC § 242.

Of course, you would also want to check out all the documents webbed
here: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/index.html

The documents webbed on your cult’s hate site, and the ” settlement”
“contract” that underlies them are no more lawful and judicially
enforceable than a murder contract is lawful and judicially
enforceable. 18 USC § 241 is just as much a U.S. Federal crime as is
18 USC § 1111.

18 USC § 242. states:

[Quote]

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or
custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if
bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this
section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened
use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if
death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or
if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an
attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for
any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

[End Quote]

Lest there be any remaining doubt whatsoever, this message, by posting
to the Usenet newsgroups de.soc.weltanschauung. scientology,
alt.religion.scientology and alt.clearing.technology, and by e-mail to
every Scientology and Scientology affiliated organization and entity
for which I have addresses, will inform you, and every Scientologist
from David Miscavige on down, and every Scientology organization and
entity and Scientology affiliated organization and entity, and all
their officers, agents, representatives, employees, volunteers,
directors, successors, assigns and lawyers, that there is no law in
the United States that permits you or any of you to do what you have
been trying to do and are trying to do with me. All of you are in
violation of 18 USC § 241 and 18 USC § 242.

What all of you are doing with me makes it reasonable, accurate and
non-libelous to call Scientology — as many people already do — a
criminal enterprise, a criminal cult, or a crime cult, crime
syndicate, etc. What you all are doing with me legally protects every
wog® who calls or has ever called your crime cult a crime cult. Anyone
can simply point to your “contract” that you insist you have with me,
which compels virtually every Scientologist to violate U.S. federal
criminal laws, and point to the unlawful actions you have taken to
enforce that “contract,” to demonstrate conclusively that Scientology
is a criminal conspiracy actively involved in crime. It is a crime
cult.

Just think about it. If your cult has not irreversibly robbed you of
all your intellectual faculties, just think about it.

1. It is unlawful to prevent someone from communicating his knowledge
of the commission of a crime.

2. What you all are doing and attempting to do with me are crimes,
specifically, as provided above, 18 USC § 241 and 18 USC § 242.

3. If any of you asserted that you are committing no such crimes, such
an assertion would only add to the crimes and provide me with more
justification to communicate about the crimes you are committing.

4. Even if the U.S. Federal Government — should it really be in your
little dictator’s pocket — stated that all of you, by what you are
doing with me, are not committing any crime, I could not lawfully be
prevented from communicating the Government’s statement, and opposing
its statement or ruling with my knowledge and experiences.

5. If even the U.S. Supreme Court stated or adjudged that it is just
ducky for every Scientologist, and all your orgs, companies, agents
and lawyers, and the whole of the U.S. Government to conspire to
injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate me in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or
enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to me by the Constitution
or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised
the same, I could not be lawfully silenced because such a statement,
judgment would itself be an unlawful act under 18 USC § 242.

6. I cannot be lawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about
being unlawfully silenced.

7. I cannot be lawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about
being unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced.

8. I cannot be lawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about
being unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about being
unlawfully silenced.

9. I cannot be lawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about
being unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about being
unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced.

10. I cannot be lawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced
about being unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about
being unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about being
unlawfully silenced.

11. I cannot be lawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced
about being unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about
being unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced about being
unlawfully silenced about being unlawfully silenced.

You cannot help but notice that these federal crimes that you and
virtually all Scientologists are committing in what you are doing with
me are violations of U.S. Civil Rights Statutes. So another tremendous
windfall from your “contract,” my signing and your enforcement efforts
is that your cult’s claims of being a promoter and defender of human
rights are shown to be disgusting lies. Your “contract” shows in the
clearest of lights that what Scientology and virtually all
Scientologists, including your “celebrities,” seek is the suppression
and destruction of human rights. You seek as a “human right” the right
to destroy human rights, which is no “right” that any human should be
given. An organized group that seeks such an inhuman “right” should be
fought to the death to prevent them from ever obtaining it.

Since in your “game” with me, which your nanodictator David Miscavige
chose for you to “play,” you and virtually every Scientologist cannot
but lose if I but live, it is reasonable to expect that you will have
me assassinated. After all, you and every other Scientologist embrace
the idiocy that “Scientology is the only game in which everyone wins.”
Since neither you nor Scientology can win against me lawfully it is
reasonable to expect that you will attempt to win against me
unlawfully; e.g., with my murder. Tens of thousands of you have
already demonstrated for many years that you do not fear to hurt me in
your unjust cause. I don’t think assassinating me in the same unjust
cause is much different.

Your reasonable choice, obviously, is to state that you wish to no
longer be a beneficiary of your cult’s fair game, “creed”-violating,
crime-committing “contract” with Gerry Armstrong. Your cult, of course
compels you to be “unreasonable.” Being “unreasonable” compels you to
commit crimes.

I cannot be lawfully compelled — as you and your fellow
Scientologists quite clearly believe you are all compelled — to
participate in your cult’s crimes. You and all your fellow cultists
may obtain great satisfaction, or thrills, or even illusory gnarly OT
powers, by your criminality, by, e.g., your violations of 18 USC §
241 and § 242. I can’t help that. You are free to be stupid, free to
be wrong, free to be deluded, and free to be criminal. It is true that
Scientology makes both the able and the unable more criminal. But,
being a wog® I cannot lawfully be compelled to myself commit crimes.

If I submitted to your “settlement” “contract,” and considered this
grotesquely unlawful document lawful, I would violate my own creed. I
would violate my own creed that states that everyone has the right to
think freely, to talk freely, to write freely his own opinions and to
counter or utter or write upon the opinions of others. You
Scientologists may chose to be hypocrites for all the “benefits” that
hypocrisy confers on its “beneficiaries,” but I cannot lawfully be
coerced into such hypocrisy.

The divine irony, which you and your fellow Scientologists have bought
with your millions in fees, is that you have created in me a legal
duty to not be silenced by your “contract’ and to not obey any of
the court orders you have obtained that “enforce” your ” contract.” I
had a legal duty to say everything I have ever said in “violation” of
your “contract.” To do otherwise would be a crime. I have a legal duty
to say every word I have said in this very message. I have a legal
duty to not do what you say — to “move [my] sad behind back to CA and
take care of [my] open arrest warrant.” I have a legal duty to not be
a criminal, as virtually all Scientiologists are criminals. After
all, if everyone participated in criminality, there would be no one to
report it.

Note well — because this is a big deal in your little leader’s black
PR hat — that in reporting a crime, you do not need to prove it. In
reporting a crime, you just have to allege it. My big dictionary
states that “allege” means “to state or declare as if under oath
positively and assuredly but without offering complete proof.” It is
the job of the prosecutor to prove the allegation.

It is obviously idiotic to report a crime that has been proven,
because that crime would already have been before a judge and jury.
One reports a crime that is alleged.” You just have to allege it. And
it is unlawful to prevent the reporting of an alleged crime. That is,
federally, a violation of 18 USC § 1512. I can, with no difficulty
whatsoever, prove that virtually every Scientologist is committing
the crimes prohibited by 18 USC §§ 241, 242 and 1512. But the proof is
not my job. Proof is the FBI’s and the U.S. Attorney’s job. My job is
to just allege it.

With your cult’s billions, and its fair game campaign and lobbying
efforts, you could conceivably be successful in getting legislation
passed in Congress that makes it legal to conspire to injure, oppress,
threaten, or intimidate persons in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege secured to them by the Constitution or laws of the United
States, or because of their having so exercised the same. You could be
successful in getting Congress to eliminate all the rights or
privileges that people now have, so that you wouldn’t have to bother
injuring, oppressing, threatening or intimidating them out of
exercising those rights or privileges. You could even get Congress to
make it legal for you cultists to kidnap, sexually abuse and kill good
people under color of law.

But until you get a sick Congress to pass such legislation, you and
each of you, and every Scientology organization, affiliated company or
entity, and all of their directors, officers, employees, volunteers,
agents and lawyers are in violation of U.S. Federal Criminal Statutes.
You are all criminals. And even if you are successful in getting
Congress to pass such legislation you will still all be criminals,
because your actions to suppress and destroy people’s basic rights,
though your actions may cease being crimes against U.S. law, will
always be crimes against humanity.

I do not want to leave you, Mr. Waterkamp and all you “beneficiaries, ”
with the silly notion that I am delighted with showing you all to be
creed breakers, fair gamers and criminals, or that I’m happy with all
the unlawful orders you have against me. It is threatening beyond
belief to know that every director, officer, employee, volunteer,
agent or lawyer of every Scientology org or affiliated company or
entity has signed on to commit U.S. federal crimes to destroy me. I
want it to stop immediately.

I have tried without ceasing to get even one Scientologist to come to
his or her senses. But none of you can think for yourself. You are all
brainwashed. If you threw off the brainwashing, thought for yourself,
did the right thing, stopped violating your cruddy “creed, stopped
fair gaming, stopped your criminality, you could not continue to be a
Scientologist under the Miscavige regime. Just try it. Any of you
reading this message, just state that you no longer wish to be a
beneficiary of your cult’s “contract” with me that violates your
“creed,” and makes you fair gamers and criminals.

Just try it. All you have to lose is losing itself.

Gerry Armstrong
c/o Dialog Zentrum Berlin
Heimat 27
D-14165 Berlin-Zehlendorf
Germany
Tel: +49 (0) 30-84723958
Fax: +49 (0) 1212-5-205-27-015
gerry@gerryarmstrong.org

© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org

Thread

Breach 13

From Order of Contempt of 02-20-1998:

(m) On that date November 26, 1997, Armstrong created another Internet posting which purported to be a verbatim transcription of a complaint which Armstrong had recently filed in the United States District court for the District of  Nevada. See Wilson declaration Exhibit S. This complaint is a “documentary work” concerning a ” beneficiary” as contemplated by the Order while the filing of this complaint is privileged, its publication on the Internet is not and is a violation of the terms of the Judgment.

From Wilson Declaration of 12-01-1997:

26. Armstrong’s most recent violation of the Injunction came on November 26, 1997. On that date, Armstrong created another Internet posting which purported to be a verbatim transcription of a complaint which Armstrong had recently filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. A true and correct copy of this posting is attached hereto as Exhibit [S]. A review of this virtually unintelligible ” complaint” reveals its true nature, a cynical attempt to cloak Armstrong’s anti-Scientology ravings with the litigation privilege.

---

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/a254da0a2047d209?dmode=source&hl=en

From: armstr…@ntonline.com (gerry armstrong)
Subject: The Beginning of the End of Endless Black PR
Date: 1997/11/26
Message-ID: <347b7ad3.70867530@news.dowco.com>
X-Deja-AN: 292683380
Organization: dowco.com internet (ISP)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Yesterday, November 24 the following complaint was filed on my behalf
in US District Court in Reno, Nevada.

I am in the process of moving to my new digs in the Silver State, but
will be at this address for a few days.

I hope this adds to everyone’s (Scientologists’ and Non
scientologists’) reasons for a Happy Thanksgiving.

Gerry
[Quote]

George W. Abbott, Esq.
GEORGE W. ABBOTT, CHTD.
Nevada Bar No. 2178
2245-B Meridian Boulevard
P.O. Box 98
Minden, Nevada 89423
(702) 782-2302
(702) 782-8362 (fax)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

CV-N-97-00670-HDM (RAM)
GERALD ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff,

vs.
,
DAVID MISCAVIGE and CATHY
NORMAN, individuals; CHURCH
OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
a California corporation;
RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER ,
a California corporation; the
SEA ORGANIZATION,a California
based unincorporated entity ;
and the CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
OF TEXAS, a Texas corporation;

Defendants.

COMPLAINT FOR LIBEL AND FOR DEFAMATION AND FOR OTHER RELIEF

JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff, Gerald Armstrong, alleges as follows:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. Subject matter jurisdiction resides in this Court
pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. sec. 1332 as plaintiff is a resident of
Nevada, and defendants are residents of California or of Texas.

2. The amount in controversy exceeds Seventy-five
Thousand Dollars ($75,000), exclusive of interest and costs.

3. Venue is laid in this United States District Court
(Northern Division) for the District of Nevada pursuant to 28
USCA sec. 1391 (a) and pursuant to Local Rule 1002 (b) (1-2).

NATURE OF THE ACTION

4. Plaintiff, as claims for relief, alleges
entitlement to damages caused by defendants’ malicious
publication and dissemination of false and defamatory
statements, as well as claiming damages for defendants’
intentional infliction of emotional distress upon him.

PARTIES

5. Plaintiff Gerald Armstrong (”GA”, “Armstrong”) a
resident of Nevada at the time of filing this complaint, from
1969 through 1981 was a devoted and trusted Scientologist. From
1971 through 1981 he was a member of the Sea Organization, the
highly dedicated upper echelon and management arm of Scientology.
For significant portions of that period he dealt directly with
Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard and became intimately familiar
with organization policies and practices. Armstrong’s last
assignment was to maintain and make available to Hubbard’s
biographer the most personal and revealing Hubbard boyhood-
forward lifetime documents. It was in this period that Armstrong
discovered the dark side of Scientology’s founder, ultimately
leading Armstrong to leave the organization.

6. Defendant Church of Scientology International
(”CSI”) and defendant Religious Technology Center (”RTC”) both
California corporations, as recently as October 29, 1997 have
been found by the California Superior Court of Los Angeles County
to be two of the alter ego firm control entities of the full
Scientology operations.

7. Defendant Sea Organization (”Sea Org”), an
unincorporated California-based entity or association housed in
the various business offices of that state’s corporate party
defendants herein, is the third of the alter ego entities which
control Scientology throughout the world.

8. Defendant David Miscavige (”DM”, “Miscavige”) is
the individual who is the present RTC chairman and the highest
ranking member of the Sea Org. The Sea Org, on information and
belief and upon proofs to be adduced in these proceedings, is
“the absolute power center” of the whole “Scientology”
establishment said to be located worldwide, including 150
satellite or affiliated entities claimed to exist in the United
States. Miscavige sits alone and highest at the very center of
“the absolute power center,” controlling absolutely by whatever
traditional Scientology/Hubbard/Miscavige means are required.

9. Defendant Church of Scientology of Texas (”CST”)
is a Texas corporation, under the domination and control of the
California defendants herein.

10. Defendant Cathy Norman (”Norman”) is an employee
of CST, and responsible to, receiving orders from, and under the
domination and control of, the California defendants herein.

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

11. Plaintiff does repeat, reallege, adopt, and
incorporate by reference as though set out in haec verba herein,
each allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 10 hereinabove.

12. In 1981 Armstrong became disillusioned because his
duties led him to archived papers disclosing critical personal
frauds and organization deceptions perpetrated by other Hubbard
intimates and by Hubbard himself during his years heading up
Scientology. During his archiving activities Armstrong observed
that over Hubbard’s adult life he used a philosophy of
“opportunistic hatred” and the “acts which flow therefrom (lying,
cheating, stealing, compromising, entrapping, obstructing,
bullying, blackmailing, destroying) as the solution to his
problems.”

13. In the 1960’s Hubbard established this philosophy
and practice as policy for the Scientology organization’s
treatment of people designated as “enemies,” and dubbed this
policy “fair game.” The fair game policy states that “enemies”
“may be deprived of property, injured by any means by any
Scientologist…may be tricked, sued, or lied to or destroyed.”

14. One of Scientology’s mechanisms for implementation
of fair game against a designated “enemy” is a policy and
practice of character assassination, which Hubbard termed “black
propaganda” or “black PR.” The stated purpose of black PR is to
destroy an “enemy’s” reputation and credibility or public belief
in him by the manufacture and spreading of falsehoods about him.

15. Fair game has been judicially condemned many
times. In a landmark California proceeding, Los Angeles Superior
Court Judge Paul G. Breckenridge, Jr. in his decision rendered in
1984 in the case of Scientology v. Gerald Armstrong, Case No.
C420153, stated in a now haunting declaration:
“In addition to violating and abusing its own members
civil rights, the organization over the years with its
“Fair Game” doctrine has harassed and abused those
persons not in the Church whom it has perceived as
enemies. The Organization clearly is schizophrenic and
paranoid, and this bizarre combination seems to be a
reflection of it founder LRH.”

16. In response to such judicial and societal
condemnation of its practices, defendants have claimed over the
past many years that the fair game doctrine had been “canceled”,
is “no longer Scientology policy” and “no longer practiced.”
Defendants claim that the people who were harassing and abusing
others were doing so in violation of Hubbard’s/organization
policy, and as a result were purged from the organization.
Defendant Miscavige, the present supreme director of all
Scientology components, claims that he was personally responsible
“for the purge” and “for the elimination of fair game
activities.”

SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS

17. Plaintiff does repeat, reallege, adopt, and
incorporate by reference herein as though set out in haec verba
herein, each allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 16
hereinabove.

18. The grim truth however — and notwithstanding the
repeated public Miscavige statements, as demonstrated infra — is
that defendants herein have designated Armstrong an “enemy” and
have from the time he left Scientology and up to the present
subjected him to fair game and a massive international black PR
campaign. The document which gives rise to this complaint was
created and disseminated by defendant components of the
Scientology enterprise pursuant to fair game, and is black
propaganda.

19. Rather than deal responsibly with and actually
eliminate their antisocial nature and practices as condemned by
Judge Breckenridge, defendants have chosen to continue to subject
designated “enemies,” including Armstrong, to fair game and black
PR. In their document which gives rise to this complaint,
defendants seek to undermine the validity of Judge Breckenridge’s
decision by destroying Armstrong’s reputation and credibility
through the manufacture and dissemination of falsehoods about
him. Clear, irrefutable proof is shown immediately hereinafter,
that “fair game” and “black propaganda”are very much alive and
spreading their frightening and historically contemptible poisons
however, whenever, wherever, the Scientology’s Miscavige-CSI-RTC-
Sea Org cabal dictates.

20. Triggering this complaint: on October 21, 1996
one Cathy Norman caused transmission and publication of a one
page letter on the letterhead of the Church of Scientology of
Texas, Austin, to Craig Branch, Watchman Fellowship, P.O. Box
530842, Birmingham, Alabama, 35253. This letter showed a “cc:
James Walker”, thus broadening its publication. Copy by
photocopy of the October 21, 1996 Norman-Branch letter marked
Armstrong Exhibit A is annexed and incorporated herein.

21. One of the enclosures was an eight page document
bearing a top line first date of 10-May-1993, followed by a court
of law case name in capital letters and the date (emphasis added)
June 20, 19_84_, _viz_:

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA (PLAINTIFF)
vs.
GERALD ARMSTRONG (DEFENDANT)
June 20, 19_84_

22. As will presently be shown by plaintiff’s
allegations, the first three paragraphs of this May 10, 19_93_
forty-five hundred + word critique by Miscavige-CSI-RTC-Sea Org
of a June 20, 19_84_ decision of a State of California Superior
Court Judge (Breckenridge) sent on October 21, 19_96_ by a Texas
Scientologist loyalist (Cathy Norman) to an Alabama Watchman
Fellowship adherent (Craig Branch) capsulize what this case is
all about. The subject documents reached plaintiff Armstrong in
Marin County, California before the month of November, 1996 was
over. The first paragraph, including its ” headline” (the
“defendant” referred to is Gerald Armstrong, plaintiff here),
reads:
“FALSEHOOD IN DECISION OF JUDGE BRECKENRIDGE:
“While defendant has asserted various theories of
defense, the basic thrust of his testimony is that he
did what he did because he believed that his life,
physical and mental well being, as well as that of his
wife were threatened because the organization was aware
of what he knew about the life of LRH, the secret
machinations and financial activities of the Church and
his dedication to the truth.”

23. The second paragraph of Armstrong Exhibit B,
including “headline” reads:
“TRUE INFORMATION:
“Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Paul
Breckenridge made the above statement as a part of a
decision where the Church had sued Armstrong for theft
of certain confidential documents from the Church. Far
from any “dedication to the truth,” Armstrong had
boasted of his ability to lie and to forge documents.”

24. The third paragraph then continues what can only
be described accurately — if fidelity to the 1970s precepts of
L. Ron Hubbard himself is to be maintained — as a 1993
Miscavige-CSI-RTC-Sea Org dissemination out of California of an
archetype, “fair game” implemented “Church of Scientology black
propaganda document,” _viz_:
“Gerald Armstrong is a former clerk (Note 1) employed
by Church of Scientology of California. During the
later years of his tenure as an employee of the Church,
Armstrong was placed in charge of a huge quantity of
documents that belonged to L. Ron Hubbard that
contained private and personal information regarding
Mr. Hubbard. Part of his duties included research to
support the work of an author who had been retained to
write an authorized biography of Mr. Hubbard.”

(Note 1: The labeling by Miscavige-CSI-RTC-Sea Org of Gerald
Armstrong as “a former clerk” reveals another black PR habit of
the Scientology people, that of persistently demeaning an “enemy”
or adversary. The truth is that the Armstrong positions in the
Sea Org actually included these: Ship’s Legal Officer, Ship’s
Public Relations Officer, Ship’s Intelligence Officer, L.Ron
Hubbard’s Deputy External Communications Aide, Deputy Commanding
Officer of Hubbard’s Household Unit, and L. Ron Hubbard Biography
Researcher.)

A copy of the full eight page document, marked Armstrong Exhibit
B — with the 27 paragraphs each bearing an Arabic numeral (thus,
1 through 27) — is annexed and by such reference is incorporated
herein.

25. The two documents, Armstrong Exhibit A and
Armstrong Exhibit B, taken together, contain printed paragraphs
constituting libel per se. The two documents, taken together,
and as they were disseminated and mailed, constitute the
malicious and defamatory statements concerning plaintiff
Armstrong identified hereinafter. [Note, each "Item_ _" is keyed
to an Armstrong Exhibit B number stamped (as in 1 through 27) on
the left hand margin of Exhibit B."] Random partial
highlighting of some of the twenty-seven paragraphs support the
initial Armstrong claims for relief.

Item 2: “Gerry Armstrong far from being afraid for his
life, was actively engaged in secret machinations
his own to seize control of the Church…Armstrong
has boasted at length of his ability to lie and to
forge documents (Note 2).”

(Note 2: As defendants know (or are charged with knowing)
Miscavige-CSI-RTC-Sea Org (or at least the latter surely know)
the late L. Ron Hubbard, if it suited his purposes,
unhesitatingly _commanded_ document forgery and/or document
alteration, just as he caused to be constructed — much of it
still part of the Hubbard folklore — many egregiously false
aspects of his own life history, accomplishments, and beliefs.

Item 3: “Gerald Armstrong is a former clerk…”

Item 4: “Armstrong. . .left. . .taking with him huge
numbers of confidential documents which belonged
to Mr. Hubbard or his wife…”

Item 5: “… the Church received evidence that Armstrong
had stolen thousands of documents from Archives
when he left the Church.”

Item 6: “Once the demand…was made, Armstrong turned the
stolen documents over …”

Item 7: “. . .Church sued Armstrong for conversion, breach
of fiduciary duty…and invasion of privacy based
on Armstrong’s theft of extensive amounts of
papers owned by the Church or the Hubbards.”

Item 8: “His defense was stricken on four different
occasions (Note 3) by three different judges.”

(Note 3: This defendants’ statement is, simply, not true. The
defense of justification, or privilege, was never stricken. The
pre-trial judges did not permit the then-defendant Armstrong to
depend on the defense of “unclean hands,” which would have barred
then-plaintiff Scientology from proceeding _in limine_.)

Item 9: “Armstrong and Flynn were ordered to turn all
copies of the documents that Armstrong had stolen
over to the court. . .”

Item 10: “The Church presented motions to prevent Armstrong
from introducing the stolen confidential
documents…The Church was completely ambushed in
the trial by these documents…the Church had no
chance to prepare and put on that evidence before
being hit with the documents in trial.”

Item 11: “…witnesses…testified…with regard to his
alleged justification for stealing the documents.”

Item 13: “The Church had proven that Armstrong was guilty
of stealing…Judgment, however, was entered in
favor of Armstrong, essentially finding that…The
only lawsuit that there was to fear was the one
that was ultimately filed for return of the stolen
documents.”

Item 14: “…when he committed these thefts Armstrong…was
engineering a plan to infiltrate and take over the
Church at the behest of the Criminal Investigation
Division of the Internal Revenue Service…”

Item 15: “…the Church obtained permission from the Los
Angeles Police Department to conduct undercover
surveillance of Armstrong (Note 4)…”

(Note 4: Here, in this Exhibit B, the reader finds Miscavige-
CSI-RTC-Sea Org, for whatever Scientology type purpose, not
telling the whole (truthful part of) the story. In Item 15,
above, the persons in charge untruthfully assert “the Church
obtained permission from the Los Angeles Police Department”. So
too, in the Miscavige Declaration of February 8, 1994 (at page
31, lines 27-28, DM Declaration “under penalty of perjury”) Mr.
Miscavige swears that: “Armstrong was proven a liar. In a police-
sanctioned investigation…” What this head man’s patent
untruth does not reveal about their “undercover agent”, one
Eugene M. Ingram, the opinion of no less a public figure than the
Chief of Police, Los Angeles, in the annexed Armstrong Exhibit E
reveals (emphasis supplied) that: the letter is believed “to have
been drafted by Ingram himself,” and that “The Los Angeles Police
Department _has not_ cooperated with Eugene Ingram. _It will be
a cold day in hell when we do_.”

Item 17: “…his justification defense…was completely
bogus…”

Item 25: “The Court of Appeal upheld Breckenridge’s
decision on the legal technicality that it
believed a justification defense is available to
defend against theft in California.”

Item 27: “The Church recently sued Armstrong for his
blatant disregard of his obligations under the
settlement agreement…another Superior Court
Judge was not impressed and slapped Armstrong
(Note 5) with a preliminary injunction.”

(Note 5: While defendants CSI-Miscavige et al choose to exult for
a moment over issuance of a _preliminary_ restraining order,
plaintiff suggests that unaccustomed Scientology candor would at
this point have less triumphantly revealed the other half of this
“good news, bad news” vignette, _viz_, Judge Sohigian, while
granting a narrow part of Scientology’s requested injunction
_also stated_ that:
“[Scientology] involves abusing people who are weak…
involves techniques of coercion. . .[there is] a very,
very substantial deviation between [Scientology's]
conduct and standards of ordinary, courteous conduct
and standards of ordinary, honest behavior. . .[when
dealing with Scientology] be sure you cut the deck…
make sure to count all the chips.”

26. Plaintiff, upon learning of the existence of the
subject libelous materials, called their existence to the
attention of his undersigned counsel in Nevada attorney George
Abbott. After lengthy Armstrong-Abbott discussion, the two agreed
to make demand of and afford written opportunity for publication
of full retraction by Ms. Norman, as well as by defendants CSI,
RTC and Miscavige.

27. Prior to making demand for retraction, plaintiff
and his legal counsel had concluded that the transparently
provable facts constitute clear evidence that “fair game” and
black PR” has pursued Gerry Armstrong up to today — whatever
misstated history and facts Scientology’s all-powerful David
Miscavige has chosen to rewrite. A photocopy of the letter sent
to defendant Cathy Norman, with copies to CSI, RTC and Miscavige
and dated February 12, 1997 is annexed hereto as Armstrong
Exhibit C, and incorporated herein.

28. The only response to the Norman-CSI-RTC-Miscavige
directed letters came from one attorney Andrew Wilson, whose
opening statement declared that “[t]his firm represents Church of
Scientology International (”CSI”) in the referenced matter and
has been asked to respond to your letter,” and who rejected
plaintiff’s demand for retraction out of hand. A photocopy of the
letter received from Mr. Wilson and dated February 25, 1997 is
annexed hereto as Armstrong Exhibit D, and incorporated herein.

29. Plaintiff does repeat, reallege, adopt, and
incorporate by reference herein as though set out in haec verba
herein, each allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 28
hereinabove.

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

30. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 1 Armstrong had stolen Scientology’s and Hubbard’s
documents (Exhibit B, paras.5,6,7,8,9,10,11,
13,14,18)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

31. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 2 Armstrong’s defense of justification in his 1984
trial because of his fear of attacks by
Scientology was a total farce, completely bogus, a
fraud, and a fraudulent sabotage (Exhibit B,
paras. 2,14,17,20)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

32. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 3 Scientology was ambushed by Armstrong and his
attorney at trial and had no chance to prepare and
put on evidence (Exhibit B, paras. 10,12)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

33. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 4 Armstrong wanted to seize control of Scientology
(Exhibit B, paras. 2,14,16)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

34. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 5 Armstrong sought to recruit dissident
Scientologists to overthrow the organization
(Exhibit B, paras. 15,16)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

35. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 6 The Los Angeles Police Department granted
Scientology permission to conduct undercover
surveillance of Armstrong (Exhibit B, para. 15)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

36. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 7 Armstrong created a plan to plant forged and
incriminating documents in Scientology files to be
found in a raid by the Internal Revenue Service
(Exhibit B, paras. 16,19)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

37. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 8 Armstrong stated that neither truth nor good faith
play any significant role in litigation (Exhibit
B, para. 21)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

38. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 9 Armstrong stated that facts mean nothing to a
civil litigant and that truth is merely an
avoidable obstacle (Exhibit B, para. 21)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

39. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 10 Armstrong boasted at length of his ability to lie
and to forge documents (Exhibit B, para. 2)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

40. On all of the foregoing allegations and pursuant
to applicable law plaintiff does claim damages in an amount to be
established upon proofs to be adduced and does set out the
damaging words:
Falsehood 11 The evidence shows Armstrong’s state of mind to be
of a calculating, aggressive and dishonest
character (Exhibit B, para. 24)
This statement by defendants concerning plaintiff is false and
libel per se.

41. The above falsehoods were known by defendants to
be false and were manufactured and disseminated by defendants
maliciously with the intention of causing plaintiff to be
mistrusted, reviled, shunned, humiliated and further attacked,
and as a result of defendants’ manufacture and dissemination of
the above falsehoods plaintiff was mistrusted, reviled, shunned,
humiliated and further attacked.

42. Separately and together, these falsehoods, supra,
were calculated to cause great injury to plaintiff’s reputation,
credibility and character.

43. Plaintiff has always enjoyed a good reputation for
honesty, truthfulness and uprightness of character. Judge
Breckenridge in his 1984 decision stated regarding plaintiff that
“he did what he did, because … [of] his dedication to the
truth;” and that his “testimony [was] credible, extremely
persuasive.”

44. The calculated, willful, reckless, and harmful
mistreatment — with resulting physical, mental, and economic
damages — exemplified by the allegations of each of the foregoing
eleven claims for relief, directly caused the injuries to plaintiff’s
person alleged in the hereinafter alleged Twelfth
Claim for Relief.

TWELFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

45. Plaintiff does repeat, reallege, adopt, and
incorporate by reference as though set out in haec verba herein,
each allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 44 hereinabove.

46. Plaintiff, for a twelfth claim for relief does
allege that for more than fifteen years defendant David Miscavige –
individually, and in concert with a handful of societal kin,
with others making up an all-powerful “Scientology” cabal — has
been engaged in a relentless, never-interrupted course of conduct
designed to destroy plaintiff Gerald Armstrong.

47. The methods of destruction at hand were those
approved, indeed in no small part invented by the now deceased
L. Ron Hubbard. Central to the chosen means were the “fair game”
and “black propaganda” techniques and practices described
hereinabove. Defendant Miscavige was not above indulging in
false, wholly untrue, harmful and spiteful, even inhumane,
statements, including even those “under penalty of perjury”, as
exemplified by the exposition of Miscavige sworn and unsworn
public statements to the light of truth, supra. As two examples
of this defendant’s willingness to be untruthful, the complaint
specifically identifies DM’s “sworn under penalty of perjury”
declarations embracing the much-vaunted Miscavige insistence that
“early on, _I_ ended fair game, once and for all”; so too, the
Miscavige flat out claim an “undercover agent” was “sanctioned”
by the Los Angeles Police Department, a claim proven to be a lie.
_See_ Armstrong Exhibit E.

48. A search by plaintiff through discovery will be
needed to confirm (or to deny) the many and diverse rumors afloat
regarding the degree of “fair game” and “black propaganda”
directed at Armstrong over the past fifteen year period and
currently.

49. Meantime plaintiff alleges unbridled misconduct
– by defendant Miscavige, and/or under his control and
direction, and/or within his knowledge and acquiescence at all
times, all within the purview of the defendants and each of them
– which conduct has been and is, designed to inflict nonstop
severe and grossly damaging emotional distress.

50. (a) By means of the premises herein established,
these defendants and each of them have unlawfully and maliciously
caused plaintiff to become greatly vexed, harassed, and injured,
have caused him to suffer great mental and nervous strain, and
caused his feelings to be hurt.

(b) Defendants’ misconduct has also caused plaintiff
to be exposed to, and to have suffered, intended or actual public
and institutional (e.g. Watchman Fellowship) hatred, contempt,
and obloquy, all constituting misconduct designed to deprive him
of public confidence and social intercourse in the communities in
which he has resided or where he has sojourned.

(c) The actions of defendants designed to destroy
plaintiff — embracing “destruction” in all its forms, literally,
physically, psychicly, mentally, in his livelihood, in ordinary
senses of well being, through every form of intentional
infliction of emotional distress — in compensatory damages in
amount upon proofs to be adduced but estimated to exceed $900,000
from and after May 10, 1993. On said premises, and by reason of
the aforesaid acts of defendants, plaintiff has sustained serious
actual damages, in an amount to proven at trial, but no less than
the minimum jurisdictional amount for this Court.

TRIAL OF THIS MATTER BEFORE A JURY IS DEMANDED.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for damages against all
defendants, jointly and severally, as follows:

ON ALL TWELVE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF ABOVE SET OUT
1. For general damages according to proof at trial.
2. For special damages according to proof at trial.
3. For costs of suit.
4. For punitive damages; and
5. For such other relief as the Court may deem just.

Dated: Minden, Nevada
November 21, 1997,

Respectfully submitted,

GEORGE W. ABBOTT, CHARTERED
George W. Abbott
STATE OF NEVADA )
: ss.
COUNTY OF DOUGLAS )

GERALD ARMSTRONG, under penalty of perjury, makes the
following assertions:
He is the plaintiff in the above-entitled action; that he
has read the foregoing Complaint for Libel and for Defamation,
and for Other Relief and knows the contents thereof; that the
same is true of his own knowledge, except for those matters
therein contained stated upon information and belief, and as to
those matters, he believes it to be true.
Gerald Armstrong

Subscribed and sworn to before

me this 21st day of November, 1997.
Notary Public

[End Quote]
Thread

Breach 6

From Order of Contempt of 02-20-1998:

(f) Also on or about October 20, 1997, in violation of the Order, Armstrong created and caused to be widely disseminated by means of the Internet a documentary work which violated the terms of the above referenced Judgment. See Wilson declaration. Exhibit J.

From Wilson Declaration of 12-01-1997:

20. Also on or about October 20, 1997, in violation of the Order, Armstrong created and caused to be widely disseminated by means of the Internet a documentary work which discussed CSI and other beneficiaries of the Settlement Agreement. A true and correct copy of said documentary work is attached hereto as Exhibit [J].

---

Exhibit J:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/86b38058f6a00b59?dmode=source&hl=en

From: armstr…@ntonline.com (gerry armstrong)
Subject: Re: Question to (Ex?)Members, concerning other religions
Date: 1997/10/20
Message-ID: <344bda83.4496160@news.rapidnet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 282073495
References: <mWyNrUAl4zS0EwMs@xemu.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Rapidnet Technologies Internet
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
On Mon, 20 Oct 1997 12:19:01 +0100, Dave Bird—St Hippo of Augustine
<d…@xemu.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
> Scientology presents itself in W.I.S. as “an applied religious
> philiosophy” compatible with other religious beliefs. I know
> this is a somewhat disputed statement but….
>
> In your estimate, what percentage of staff or public Scientologists
> (in the area/nation where you were a member) were in fact active
> believers in other religions during their membership?
>
Zero!

> What religion and denomination were they??
>
I recently saw an ethics order on someone kicking them out of
Scientology for remaining a member of the Methodist Church.

It was absolutely forbidden in every part of the Scientology
enterprise where I was (Vancouver, Apollo, Dunedin, Clearwater, La
Quinta, Gilman Hotsprings, Los Angeles) for anyone to be an active
believer in any [other] religion and remain in the org. There was a
couple in the RPF in Clearwater who announced their belief in God.
They were guarded, sec checked, made to sign “crimes” culled from
their pc folders, made to accept a “freeloader debt,” and finally
“off-loaded.”

It was common “knowledge” in the organization that people who believed
in God were “psychotic” and were treated as such. Such people could of
course be used to forward Scientology’s public relations goals.

During the “Apollo” years, the 400+ people on board never admitted to
being Scientologists, and it was a security violation, punishable with
a “treason condition,” if anyone let slip to a “wog” that he or she
was a Scientologist, or that Scientology was operating on board. Our
cover was “Operation and Transport Corporation” of Panama, a business
management company. If anyone was asked by a wog in the ports we
visited what his or her religion was, the person was drilled to state
the religion he or she was raised in; e.g., Catholic, Presbyterian,
Lutheran.

This shows the facility of Scientologists in lying. The same facility
is shown in the organization’s claim of compatibility with [other]
religions. Scientology at its core is dedicated to the destruction of
[other] religions. Which to the facile Scientologists is just another
way of saying that they are all compatible.

Gerry

Thread