http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a7/3874.php

Religious Freedom Watch – Defending Religious Rights
Anti-Religious Extremists / Gerald Armstrong

Gerald Armstrong

* What his ‘friends’ think of him

Gerald Armstrong

Gerald Armstrong is a former clerk in a Scientology church.In former days, Armstrong hatched a plot to seize the Church’s assets in collaboration with the Los Angeles IRS Criminal Investigation Division.

When the Church discovered this, its attorneys obtained permission from a Los Angeles police officer to conduct an investigation into Armstrong’s plans. The investigation caught Armstrong on videotape stating that he intended to forge and then plant incriminating documents on Church premises, to be discovered in a subsequent raid.

When challenged on how he would obtain proof of the allegations he intended to make, he responded that:

“We don’t have to prove a goddam thing. We don’t have to prove shit. We just have to allege it.”

As part of the same scheme, Armstrong planned to subvert a senior Scientology executive using sexual enticement in a scheme he titled “Operation Long Prong.” This is documented both in his own handwriting and on video.

Since fleeing California, Armstrong, a native Canadian, has lived in British Columbia, Canada, and appears to have no gainful employment. Yet he has somehow managed to travel all over the world in pursuit of his hate agenda.

In 2000, Armstrong traveled to Europe to attend an anti-religious conference in Leipzig, Germany.

In 2001, Armstrong traveled extensively in Europe, joining in a hate march in France with extremist Roger Gonnet and visiting anti-religious groups in Russia and Denmark. At a meeting of hate groups in Russia, Armstrong met with deprogramming proponent Alexander Dvorkin.

In addition to his unlawful activities, Armstrong’s mental stability is questionable. Armstrong once posted a message on the Internet concerning a letter he sent to Saddam Hussein during the Gulf War. In the letter, he offered himself to Hussein as a hostage in the Iraqi war. “If either side failed to perform any part of the agreement, the other side could execute me,” he concluded. Armstrong makes clear in his posting that he did not think the letter to Hussein was a joke, but was deadly serious. He quite proudly republishes it and other similar writings from time to time. To further demonstrate how out of touch he is with reality, Armstrong had himself photographed by a newspaper naked while holding a globe to promote his theories of destroying all money.
Read Onto: What his ‘friends’ think of him
Navigation

* Media Newsroom
o BBC Panorama Exposed
o $5,000 Reward
o Is David Touretzky A Professor With A Phobia On Religion?
o A Destroyed Marriage
o News Archives
o Media Downloads
o Articles of Interest
* Anti-Religious Extremists
o Tory Christman
o Andreas Heldal-Lund
o Keith Henson
o Arnie Lerma
o David Touretzky
o Tilman Hausherr
o Barbara Graham
o More Extemists
* Intolerance & Hate
o Hate Groups
o Influence of Hate
o Hate Crimes & The Law
o Combating Hate
o Whistle-blowers
* Religious Experts
o Credible Experts
o False Experts?
* Links
o Religion
o Human Rights
o Relief Agencies
* Contact Us

* Homepage

Search This Site

Looking for something specific? Use the search form below to locate anything on the site.
Truth About Religions

For accurate informations about various religions, please select a religion from the menu below to visit it’s official site. These are trusted sources and not the works of anti-religious extremists.

© Copyright 1999-2006 Religious Freedom Watch. All Rights Reserved. Duplication of any content on this site is strictly prohibitied and is a violation of applicable laws.
Media Newsroom | Anti-Religious Extremists | Intolerance & Hate | Religious Experts | Links | Contact Us | Site Map | Homepage

Religious Freedom Watch – Defending Religious Rights
Anti-Religious Extremists / Gerald Armstrong

Gerald Armstrong

* What his ‘friends’ think of him

* Back to Gerald Armstrong

What his ‘friends’ think of him

The following is what Gerry Armstrong’s ‘friends’ think of him:

Rob Clark: “Gerry Armstrong flat-out walked off [from the Church of Scientology] with a bunch of stuff when he left….what Armstrong did would otherwise have been theft….I’m disgusted with warrior [Mark Plummer]. I was not particularly pleased when he signed off on that c—sucker Armstrong smearing me with his dumbass… page. …Armstrong is totally kooking out”

Rob Clark: “…you want to see the new nuttiest Gerry Armstrong hate page ever? The animated kicking is supposed to signify Armstrong jerking as the electroshock hits. Any time anyone else suggests that maybe this is kooky, they get a new wing added to the Armstrong hate gallery just for them. I didn’t realize Armstrong was more than mildly kooky until recently.

Paul Rubin: “I used to hang out with Armstrong a fair amount. He had a zealot and maybe paranoid streak but wasn’t whacko like this.”

Rob Clark: “Where anyone who disagrees with Armstrong’s continuing lunatic rampage gets added. If they really disagree with his lunacy, they get their own whole section as an “op” with wacky animated gifs.”

Rob Clark: “Gerry Armstrong accused her [Katherine Harris] of being Aldrich Ames.”

Stephen Sheehan: “He said this, in seriousness.”

[Name Deleted]: “He [Gerry Armstrong] is a complete idiot.”

Rob Clark: “He’s a vicious psycho is what he is.”

[Name Deleted]: “He doesn’t actually believe that, does he?

Rob Clark: “If he does believe it, he’s insane and if he doesn’t, he is deliberately libeling someone just because they disagree with his loony bullshit.”

Stephen Sheehan: “Stupid Gerry Armstrong.”

Scott Pilutik: “Martin Ottmann got his own wing in the Gerry kook-o-fame.”

Deana Holmes: “God Gerry’s a nutball.”

Scott Pilutik: “It’s ok, it’s for legal reasons the expected insanity defense.”

[Name Deleted]: “Gerry nuts = prominent critic, ergo, all critics are nuts. This is kinda serious, albeit a tad farfetched.”

Ed Hammerstrom: “Hiya ef [Elizabeth Fisher]”

[Name Deleted]: “Are you too a fan of Gerry’s osa pages?”

Ed Hammerstrom: “Not really.”

[Name Deleted]: “It gets worse and worse he now added Martin Ottmann.”

Scott Pilutik: “Martin gets his own dedicated page. It’s not quite as telling as Arnie’s subdirectories. He makes a new one each time it seems, each less descriptive and more useless as the last. He [Gerry Armstrong] never used to be this kooky. He always had a sort of Jebus complex but it never quite germinated into the messiahdom it is now.”

[Name Deleted]: “No. he always had the messiahdom but now, it seems, it is being encouraged. I mean, someone makes those pages for him I presume, Caroline [Letkeman].”

Scott Pilutik: “No idea how the dynamics of that relationship work, but I think it’s safe to say she’s [Caroline Letkeman] encouraging some seriously kooky behavior or pushing for it.”

[Name Deleted]: “Yes, that is what I see too….She [Letkeman] really is so foolish as to believe all his [Armstrong] delusions?”

Kady O’Malley: “She’s [Letkeman] obsessed with occult links.”

[Name Deleted]: “…she [Letkeman] appeared in Chilliwack, where he [Armstrong] was residing.”

Kady O’Malley: “The one interesting tidbit I note about Caroline is that until late 2001 possibly 2002 she had a listed online webpage. After she had become a visible critic under her own name.”

[Name Deleted]: “His [Armstrong] insanity is getting worse and she [Letkeman] must be encouraging it.”

Kady O’Malley: “…the thing is, you read Gerry from 1997, 1998 it’s like a different person.”

Ed Hammerstrom: “He [Armstrong] definitely is going crazy, seems to me. I think he has had alcohol problems in the past.”

Kady O’Malley: “Ed, if you were his girlfriend, wouldn’t you be doing something other that (sic) encourage him in this? I mean, I find it bizarre that she’d not only not be trying to wind him down but actively instigating.”

Elizabeth Disher: “He’s [Armstrong] always been totally paranoid.”

Ed Hammerstrom: “I have to conclude they are both in a crazy self-destructive path.”

Rob Clark: “Loonboy [Armstrong] has declared Martin Ottmann an osa op??

What a f—ing NUTCASE that is just unf—ingbelievable….I think she [Lekteman] is just yet another wigout who was only marginally sane because of the relative discipline of the cult and now, released of this, is totally batshit along with her totally batshit Gerry. Sorry, anyone who thinks Martin Ottmann is an osa op has fried their f—ing brain and needs to be under observation in a locked ward.”

Kady O’Malley: “We’re all agreed on Gerry being insane. Don’t tell warrior [Mark Plummer].”

[Name Deleted]: “Gerry really really wanted someone to web stuff for him but at the time, it was his hokey no money “philosophy” pages.”

Kady O’Malley: “…they’re [Armstrong and Letkeman] both just going mutually crazy, symbiotic psychosis.”

Rob Clark: “…marginally nutty critics would sure explain a couple things, like Arnie. Heather drove Bunker insane, their relationship was completely platonic.”

[Name Deleted]: “He [Armstrong] is getting worse.”

Rob Clark: “I don’t think he [Armstrong] went crazy that fast I think it is just only recently that he has been called on his bullshit by a lot of people.”

Kady O’Malley: “Well, the first time I noticed it was in 2001ish that’s relatively quick he probably would have kooked out insanely in 1998 if he had been called on the carpet on some thing. You might be right.”

Rob Clark: “He [Armstrong] was crazy a couple years ago re CL….In fact, the MOMENT CL started questioning his versions of event, he just went nuts….When you’re accusing Martin Ottmann of being OSA you’re completely in cloud cuckoo land. Martin Ottmann could very easily sue him for libel and win in Germany these are very nearly summary proceedings. Martin could file a libel action claiming these accusations are libelous and false and Gerry would either have to prove them or get fined. You know when he [Gerry Armstrong] went crazy with me? When I posted the transcript section detailing his money laundering. Seems he viciously attacks anyone who has anything that might tend to discredit his bullshit image as some saint instead of the shiftless, sponging kook he actually is.”

Ed Hammerstrom: “Gerry has a heavy alcohol problem….He was building an artwork of his empty booze bottles in a field in BC.”

Rob Clark: “Although this freakish paranoia is like speed or coke paranoia that or he smokes way too much dope….It’s also possible Gerry has never had a huge website before in which his lunacy could sprawl out without limit and that Caroline is merely an amanuensis to Gerry’s insanity.”

[Name Deleted]: “Is Gandow supporting him [Armstrong]?”

Kady O’Malley: “Morally or financially?”

[Name Deleted]: “Financially.”

Kady O’Malley: “Gandow has been mighty silent of late.”

[Name Deleted]: “Well if Gandow is getting money…or anybody, it may be an issue because he gets government money I believe he or his church.”

[Name Deleted]: “Gandow may just be realizing that Gerry is nuts, is all he’s a bit naive, Gandow.

[Name Deleted]: “Gandow is pretty vile himself.”

Robert Clark: “He’s despicable, god, talk about an insane asylum: Truth Seeker, Magoo, Warrior, Zinj, Fredric Rice.”

Ed Hammerstrom: “…off and quiet.”

Rob Clark: “yah, if you don’t, you end up like Gerry is lately. He has now just declared Martin Ottmann an OSA op for no sane reason. He’s totally gone off the deep end.”

Stephen Sheehan: “He’s [Armstrong] saying everyone and their grandparents are OSA.”

Rob Clark: “I ended up having warrior [Mark Plummer] repost old…shit on me because I pointed out that Gerry got fooled by a blatantly forged email. Anyway, this is the sort of stuff that can’t appear sane to a casual onlooker which is why, IMO, ars [hate newsgroup] is bad for mental health. I am more and more seeing it [ars] as a data dump than as a place where there are actual human beings who can be communicated with in a sane manner.”

Navigation

* Media Newsroom
o BBC Panorama Exposed
o $5,000 Reward
o Is David Touretzky A Professor With A Phobia On Religion?
o A Destroyed Marriage
o News Archives
o Media Downloads
o Articles of Interest
* Anti-Religious Extremists
o Tory Christman
o Andreas Heldal-Lund
o Keith Henson
o Arnie Lerma
o David Touretzky
o Tilman Hausherr
o Barbara Graham
o More Extemists
* Intolerance & Hate
o Hate Groups
o Influence of Hate
o Hate Crimes & The Law
o Combating Hate
o Whistle-blowers
* Religious Experts
o Credible Experts
o False Experts?
* Links
o Religion
o Human Rights
o Relief Agencies
* Contact Us

* Homepage

Search This Site

Looking for something specific? Use the search form below to locate anything on the site.
Truth About Religions

For accurate informations about various religions, please select a religion from the menu below to visit it’s official site. These are trusted sources and not the works of anti-religious extremists.

© Copyright 1999-2006 Religious Freedom Watch. All Rights Reserved. Duplication of any content on this site is strictly prohibitied and is a violation of applicable laws.
Media Newsroom | Anti-Religious Extremists | Intolerance & Hate | Religious Experts | Links | Contact Us | Site Map | Homepage

[Source:
http://www.parishioners.org/anti-religious-extremists/gerald-armstrong/;
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/anti-religious-extremists/gerald-armstrong/what-his-friends-think-of-him/]

From: kmoxon@earthlink.net [mailto:kmoxon@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:36 AM
To: Gerry Armstrong
Subject: RE: Revised hearing date

Mr. Armstrong:

To clarify my response to your request for a continuance:

I represent the Church of Scientology International, which is the plaintiff in the case in which we are engaged and is the party which made the motion set for September 7th.  My client has authorized me to continue that motion on the condition that until the motion is resolved, you FULLY comply with the terms of the injunction for which you have repeatedly been held in contempt.  Otherwise, make your motion for a continuance.

I chose not to respond to any other comment you have made.

Kendrick Moxon

—–Original Message—–
>From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
>Sent: Aug 9, 2007 10:15 AM
>To: kmoxon@earthlink.net
>Subject: RE: Revised hearing date
>
>August 9, 2007
>
>Kendrick L. Moxon, Esquire
>Moxon & Kobrin
>3055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900
>Los Angeles, CA 90010
>
>By E-mail:  kmoxon@earthlink.net
>
>            Re:     Scientology v. Armstrong
>                Marin Superior Court Case No. CV021632
>
>Dear Mr. Moxon:
>
>I am very interested in your offer. It’s clear I think we’re already
>half way toward a sane arrangement and the resolution of the Scientology v.
>Armstrong war.
>
>I do want to be sure that you have your client’s agreement to make this
>offer. As you know, you’re untrustworthy, as is your client, of course,
>so I have to go into this with my eyes open. Both of you could easily
>sucker me into agreeing to something, or otherwise easing up on my
>willingness to fight back, and then pull the old
>sorry-I-wasn’t-authorized-to-make-that-offer dodge, or your client
>could label you a rogue. So please confirm that your client authorizes
>your proposal. It goes without saying that your client, certainly in
>this case, although it’s captioned Scientology v. Armstrong, is, for
>decisional matters of this magnitude, David Miscavige.
>
>Please let me know as soon as possible if your client proposes this
>arrangement or agrees to the arrangement you propose. Also, please
>don’t ignore forever what you call my “scurrilous, untrue and
>unnecessary comments.” I am actually anxious to hear from you exactly
>what your client or you mean, and what are these comments of mine that
>your client or you find scurrilous, untrue and unnecessary. I think
>that if I could have the opportunity to prove to you both that my
>comments were not scurrilous, untrue or unnecessary, it would move us
>even closer to resolution of your war on me.
>
>I will only take up one of the adjectives you attach to my comments;
>that they were “unnecessary.” My comments, I’m sure you will agree, are
>all in support of my request for an extension of time to respond to
>your motion to reinstitute jail sentences and for arrest warrants
>against
me.
>
>I’m sure you’ll also agree that the extension of time is itself
>necessary, and clearly not unnecessary.  I state, e.g., in my request
>for
an extension:
>”I require an extension of time of 60 days to oppose your motion or
>take whatever other action is warranted and to prepare for a hearing on
>your motion or other actions.” If the extension of time itself was
>unnecessary, I would not have stated that I required it, but would have
>written that I didn’t require it. That would have rendered the reasons
>I gave for the unnecessary extension unnecessary. But I didn’t write
>that; I wrote that the extension of time I was requesting of 60 days to
>oppose your motion or take whatever other action is warranted and to
>prepare for a hearing on your motion or other actions was not
>unnecessary
but necessary.
>
>If it had only been necessary that I requested the extension and your
>client and you would have granted the request without any question,
>then what I wrote to explain, in advance of your anticipated question,
>why the extension was necessary would have been, conceivably at least,
>unnecessary. The request itself, provided in the above quoted sentence
>(”I require an extension of time of 60 days to oppose your motion or
>take whatever other action is warranted and to prepare for a hearing on
>your motion or other
>actions.”) contains nothing scurrilous or untrue, I’m sure you also
>cannot but agree.  As shown above, moreover, the request itself was
>necessary, and, it can be concluded, it was necessary that I make it.
>Whatever you are just alleging to be scurrilous, untrue and unnecessary
>comments, therefore, must be contained within whatever I wrote beyond
>that single sentence to, as I explained, explain why the extension was
necessary.
>
>You write that you will ignore what you say are my scurrilous, untrue
>and unnecessary comments for the moment. Clearly, if you can ignore
>what you say are my scurrilous, untrue and unnecessary comments for one
>moment, you can for every other moment. In that moment or all those
>moments, if in truth your client and you viewed everything else as
>unnecessary, you would have viewed my simple necessary request as
>necessary
and granted it.
>
>But you didn’t grant my simple and necessary request, which leads me to
>the conclusion that you’re not being truthful; which of course would
>fit with your well known untrustworthiness I commented on above. What I
>wrote, each and every comment, was necessary, and I believe you cannot
>but know it. The only reasonable interpretation is that I still haven’t
>said enough, made enough comments, to explain to you why your client
>and you should grant my request. I am ready, however, to be shown in
>this matter that I’m wrong, and that you really believe my comments
>were unnecessary, by your client and you granting my request. Just set
>the hearing on your motion and the OEX for October 26.
>
>During this time, your client and you can pull back any PIs or process
>server thugs you’ve sicced on Caroline and me and we can all dialogue
>about the resolution of the whole Scientology v. Armstrong war.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>
>
>Gerry Armstrong
>#2-46298 Yale Road
>Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
>Canada
>604-703-1373
>
>
>
>—–Original Message—–
>From: kmoxon@earthlink.net [mailto:kmoxon@earthlink.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:04 PM
>To: Gerry Armstrong
>Subject: RE: Revised hearing date
>
>Mr. Armstrong:
>
>I will ignore your scurrilous, untrue and unnecessary comments for the
>moment.
>
>However, I would be willing to provide an extension of the date set for
>the hearing only under the condition that until the matter is
>determined, you FULLY comply with the terms of the injunction for which
>you have repeatedly been held in contempt.  If you agree to these
>terms, I will grant you all the time you desire.
>
>Kendrick Moxon
>
>—–Original Message—–
>>From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
>>Sent: Aug 6, 2007 7:55 PM
>>To: kmoxon@earthlink.net
>>Subject: RE: Revised hearing date
>>
>>August 6, 2007
>>
>>Kendrick L. Moxon, Esquire
>>Moxon & Kobrin
>>3055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900
>>Los Angeles, CA 90010
>>
>>By E-mail:  kmoxon@earthlink.net
>>
>>            Re:     Scientology v. Armstrong
>>                Marin Superior Court Case No. CV021632
>>
>>Dear Mr. Moxon:
>>
>>Actually, no, September 7 is not plenty of time to respond to your
>>motion to reinstate the sentences against me. I require an extension
>>of time of 60 days to oppose your motion or take whatever other action
>>is warranted and to prepare for a hearing on your motion or other actions.
>>I suggest Friday October 26, 2007 as a reasonable date for
>>recalendaring
>your motion.
>>
>>Clearly, your client has done nothing for, as you state in your
>>motion, more than a year and a half, at least overtly or openly, to
>>get the Marin Court to reinstate your ill-gotten and already adjudged
>>unconscionable jail sentences. All that time you say your client
>>remained hopeful that I would come to my senses, so consequently your
>>client and you did nothing. Please be assured that in relevant sense
>>your doing nothing was fully rewarded, because I did come to my
>>senses, in fact I had largely come to my senses in December 1981 when
>>I decided to escape from the Scientology cult. Since I’ve demonstrably
>>come to my senses, your client will not in any way be prejudiced if
>>it, and all the Scientology parties and beneficiaries in this matter,
>>keep hoping
>another 60 days.
>>
>>Who on earth could have imagined that after all this time even David
>>Miscavige would seek to reinstate these sentences that Judge Duryee
>>already found to be unconscionable? Although I recognized and accepted
>>some time ago that Miscavige is a clear sociopath, as I said, I never
>>imagined he would be so pathologically vindictive as to have you do
>>what
>you’re doing for him.
>>Thus I am completely unprepared to defend myself in this surprising,
>>demented and of course threatening attack. I need the opportunity to
>>hire an attorney, and I need the opportunity for the attorney to study
>>the twenty-five years of cases and documents in Scientology’s
>>litigation campaign against me.
>>
>>As I’m certain you know, I don’t have the funds to fly to California
>>whenever Miscavige gets one of his little Barbarossan brainwaves. I
>>have been kept impoverished largely by the actions and threats of your
>>client, Miscavige and his henchmen. It will take some significant time
>>to raise the necessary travel money. Obviously justice mandates that I
>>be given a fair opportunity to travel to a hearing like this, even if
>>Scientology’s and Miscavige’s purpose for seeking the reinstatement of
>>the sentences against me is not only an evil purpose but unlawful.
>>
>>Obviously too I’d rather not waste everyone’s time with having to file
>>an application with the Court for an extension of time to respond when
>>your client can simply agree to such an extension and can reschedule
>>the hearing from September 7 to October 26 as easily as you
>>rescheduled it from August
>>27 to September 7. I know it is one of Scientology’s ev purps to waste
>>everyone’s time, but perhaps Miscavige can get it under control for a
>>minute and agree to the 60 day extension I’m requesting. I think that
>>60 days is the least he could do.
>>
>>Please let me know as soon as your client agrees or not because
>>clearly, although it wasn’t for your client for all those many months,
>>time is now of the essence.
>>
>>Yours sincerely,
>>
>>Gerry Armstrong
>>#2-46298 Yale Road
>>Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
>>Canada
>>604-703-1373
>>
>>
>>—–Original Message—–
>>From: kmoxon@earthlink.net [mailto:kmoxon@earthlink.net]
>>Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 6:01 PM
>>To: gerry@gerryarmstrong.org
>>Subject: Revised hearing date
>>
>>
>>To ensure you have pleanty of time to respond to my motion to
>>reinstate the sentences against you, I have moved the hearing to
>>September
7th.
>>A copy was served via federal express, but another copy is attached.
>>
>>Kendrick Moxon
>>
>
>

From: Gerry Armstrong [mailto:gerry@gerryarmstrong.org]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:34 AM
To: ‘kmoxon@earthlink.net’
Subject: RE: Hearing

August 6, 2007

Kendrick L. Moxon, Esquire
Moxon & Kobrin
3055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90010

By E-mail:  kmoxon@earthlink.net

Re:     Scientology v. Armstrong
Marin Superior Court Case No. CV021632

Dear Mr. Moxon:

If you really had believed Mr. Greene was my attorney of record in this case would you have sent your motion directly to me?

Mr. Greene is not the attorney of record in this case. A substitution of attorney substituting myself for Mr. Greene was served on your then co-counsel Andrew Wilson by mail August 24, 2004.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/sub-atty-2004-08-24.pdf

My notice of change of address to my present address was served on you by mail July 24, 2006.  Please note that I have had this notice on my web site since July 24, 2006. On that date I also posted the notice’s text as follows to the Usenet newsgroups alt.religion.scientology and de.soc.weltanschauung.scientology, both of which your client and its agents and staff closely monitor.

[Quote]

Webbed at:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/ntc-address-change-2006-07-24
.html

GERRY ARMSTRONG
#2-46298 Yale Road
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
Canada
gerry@gerryarmstrong.org
604-703-1373
In Propria Persona

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MARIN

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
Plaintiff,

vs.

GERALD ARMSTRONG,
Defendant

Case  No. CV 021632,
Consolidated with Cases Nos. 157680 and 152229

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF DEFENDANT GERRY ARMSTRONG

Date:
Time:
Department:
Trial date:

Notice is hereby given that Defendant Gerry Armstrong has changed address to:

#2-46298 Yale Road
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
Canada

Any and all notices and documents regarding this action should now be sent to the above address.

Dated:  July 24, 2006

[Signed] Gerry Armstrong

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is #2-46298 Yale Road, Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6 Canada

I served the following document:

NOTICE OF ADDRESS CHANGE OF DEFENDANT OF GERRY ARMSTRONG

on the following person at the following address on the date set forth below by sealing a true and correct copy of said document in an envelope with postage fully prepaid and depositing it with the Canada Postal Service.

Kendrick Moxon, Esquire
Moxon & Kobrin
3055 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 900
Los Angeles, CA 90010
U.S.A.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of California, the United States and Canada that the above is true and correct.

Executed on July 24, 2006 at Chilliwack, B.C., Canada.

_________________
Caroline Letkeman

************************

All documents in this case webbed at:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/index.html

[End Quote]

I also mentioned the notice of change of address in a posting to alt.religion.scientology and de.soc.weltanschauung.scientology August 1, 2007, after I discovered an entry for your motion on the Marin Superior Court’s online calendar.

[Quote]

http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/MC/courtcal/casenoq.cfm?sel_prefix=CIV&sel_c
aseno=021632

Calendar by Case Number containing: “CIV021632″
Sorted by Litigant Name

LITIGANT NAME  DATE TIME RM  CASE NUM. CASE TYPE

ARMSTRONG, GERALD  08/27/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 MOTION

ARMSTRONG, GERALD  09/06/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 ORDER OF EXAMINATION

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 08/27/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 MOTION

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 09/06/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 ORDER
OF EXAMINATION

MINTON, ROBERT  08/27/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 MOTION

MINTON, ROBERT  09/06/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 ORDER OF EXAMINATION

THE LISA MCPHERSON TRUST 08/27/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 MOTION

THE LISA MCPHERSON TRUST 09/06/07  09:00 AM L   CIV021632 ORDER OF
EXAMINATION

*************

I don’t know what the cult’s motion is, or what the order of examination concerns.  The cult hasn’t served me with any of their papers yet, but I expect something soon. I served a notice of change of address in this case on cult attorney Kendrick Moxon in July last year
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/ntc-address-change-2006-07-24
.html

By the way, litigation is often a cover for something much more nefarious.
The spin is: “Why would we assassinate Armstrong when we had just filed a motion to get his ass in court?” So keep that in mind as Miscavige makes his moves in the Scientology v. Armstrong war.

Also by the way, tomorrow, August 2 will mark the 25th anniversary of Scientology’s litigation campaign against me. These are the webbed documents in the case. I don’t have a copy of the cult’s August 2, 1982 complaint.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/index.html

That first case, Scientology v. Armstrong, Los Angeles Superior Court case no. C 420153, has to rank up there with the cult’s biggest footbullets of all time. It resulted in this famous judgment by famous Judge Paul G.
Breckenridge, Jr.:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/breckenridge-decision.html

It resulted in this devastating and often cited appellate decision:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/appeal/283cal.rptr.917.html

It resulted in my cross-complaint, which resulted in the cult paying me a pile of peag.

The August 2, 1982 lawsuit opening salvo also is still raining footbullets on the cult’s crushed and crippled feet through all the ensuing litigation (Armstrong 2 – 7) to enforce the cult’s gag contract that was created to “settle” that first lawsuit (Armstrong 1) http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/index.html

And I suppose Caroline’s and my other activities to fight and end the cult’s war on us are also fallout from DM’s strategic decision twenty-five years ago to shoot me down like a duck in a pond.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/
http://www.carolineletkeman.org/sp/
http://www.suppressiveperson.org/
http://thewar.xenu.ca/
http://ecclesiopath.xenu.ca/
http://inconcert.xenu.ca/

[End Quote]
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2wyu5w

Since July 2006, I have also provided my present address on my web site’s contact page:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/contact.html

Since July 2006, I have included my present address in any communications to Miscavige and to every other Scientologist or Scientology entity.  See, e.g., this letter I sent on November 23, 2006 to Miscavige, another of his agents Joel Phillips, and to Scientology organizations around the world, plus webbed and posted to alt.religion.scientology and de.soc.weltanschauung.scientology.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/armstrong-ltr-miscavige-2006-
11-23.html

Your proof of service for your motion states that you e-mailed your moving papers to me July 26, 2007. You don’t mention this in your e-mail letter I received yesterday, and I received no e-mail message or documents from you on July 26, or thereafter until yesterday. I find it highly unlikely that you did e-mail me, and highly likely that your proof of service, which you signed, is knowingly false.

I am aware of your client’s addiction to using the law to harass, and I am aware of your client’s and your personal penchant for litigation chicanery and, as here, document service fudgery. I am also cognizant of the false and contemptuous things you say about me in your memorandum, which, by the way, are noticeably unsupported by any declaration from you, even a perjured one.
In any event, please FedEx your papers to:
Gerry Armstrong
#2-46298 Yale Road
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
Canada

My telephone number since 2004 is 604-703-1373

Sincerely,

Gerry Armstrong
#2-46298 Yale Road
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
Canada

—–Original Message—–
From: kmoxon@earthlink.net [mailto:kmoxon@earthlink.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 10:40 AM
To: gerry@gerryarmstrong.org
Subject: Hearing

Mr. Armstrong,

This paper was served on your attorney of record in the superior court in Marin County, Ford Greene, and was sent by fedex to your address of record.
However it was returned as you have apparently moved.

Here is a pdf copy — if you provide another address I will send send you a fedex hard copy.

Please note the hearing date on August 27th.

Kendrick Moxon

http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a7/3706.php