Fair Game

Good question: “Hey Gerry, what’s the deal with you and Nancy Many and CAST?”

Victims of Scientology’s Sea Org operation are being referred to the Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking (CAST) in LA for legal and social service help. I contacted the referring person Nancy Many because I meet the criteria and need legal help, and other offered social services. She asked me a prepared set of screening questions and cleared me for CAST’s help.

Caroline and I then did some checking around and discovered a number of connections between Scientology, including OSA personnel, and CAST and its execs.  Major CAST funding was arranged by Diane Watson, a Scientologist and US Representative from California’s 33rd District. I alerted Ms. Many and posted what we were finding to Scientology-related forums. Ms. Many’s e-mail exchange with me ended in a threat that I take seriously, and consequently I will be making our correspondence public.

Because ex-SO people are being referred to CAST as human trafficking victims, this matter relates to the Headley v. Scientology human trafficking case that was just dismissed on summary judgment in US Federal District Court in LA.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22419969/Claire-Headley-Defendants-Motions-to-Dismiss-and-Strike-Out

Much of the information Caroline and I discovered up to a point we’ve posted in this thread on Operation Clambake:  http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=32760

There are discussions on Why We Protest and Ex-Scientologist Message Board that contain the same basic information plus some attacks and some support:
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/24-fair-game-reports-personal-experiences/alert-cult-compromises-human-trafficking-help-group-70673/

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?p=461168

Caroline and I have continued to gather information on this situation, all of which adds up to something fishy and scary. There’s an effort, which includes people who should know better, to discount the Scientology – CAST connections and their implications, to dispense with this as wild speculation, dispense with me as a wild speculator, keep the referral line going. It hasn’t been properly understood that I am the client and so far the only identified victim in this situation.

We’re making these videos to present further evidence we’ve assembled, and to answer various questions that people have asked or respond to certain charges. We urge people to do their own research, and if they have a question for me to ask.  If it’s a good question, I’ll answer.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

Part 11:

Part 12:

Part 13:

Vancouver Protest: Scientology Thief Busted Again For Stealing Protesters Property

Letter to Rathbun: Apology Not Needed or Wanted

Dear Mark:

Some people have been saying that I wanted an apology from you, or you should apologize to me, or even that you’ll never apologize to me, for the fair game you perpetrated against me and got others to perpetrate against me while you were in the Scientology organization. I want to assure you and everyone else that I am not seeking or asking for an apology. In fact, an apology from you without you doing what you can to correct the wrongs you perpetrated and are ongoing could be yet another cruelty. With your apology plus a quarter I could make a local payphone call.

What needs attention and resolution are ongoing black PR, ongoing injustices, ongoing human rights violations, and the ongoing effects of other crimes, which you were involved in and can help resolve. I know that you know this.

To Mark Rathbun: Help on Black PR

Dear Mark:

I’m writing to you about black PR as a key Scientology scriptural policy and practice because of my earlier requests to you to help correct and end the black PR on me that for many years you had helped generate and disseminate.

The following is an excerpt from HCOPL 11 May 1971 “Black PR,” which I used to support my paper “Scientology, the Dangerous Environment Racket.” (Note # 52)

Marty Rathbun! You Got Some ‘Splainin To Do About Scientology Crimes

Sitting Bull blowing smoke

How, Chief:

I’m writing in response to your article “The Great Middle Path,” for myself and for all Scientology victims. I also represent “Suppressive Persons” who comprise a major class within the victims population. You’re promulgating faulty and destructive information about us, and I will comment on several of these points below. I’ll probably comment on other things as well that come to mind. I’m open to powwowing, because I’m like Running Deer, eh. Or maybe Ruminating Yak.

Letter to Rathbun for help getting back stolen manuscript

Dear Mark:

In my May 31 2009 letter to you, I brought up the incident of Scientology agents breaking into my car in 1984 and stealing a bunch of my things, and Miscavige’s having them after their theft. I asked for your help getting them back; in fact I wrote the whole letter essentially asking for your help in righting years of wrongs Sea Org personnel under Miscavige, including you, have committed, and continue to commit, against me – and yes, many, many others.

Oh, now that I’ve mentioned it in the above list of Fair Game attacks on me, I’ll also ask you about the theft of my original manuscript, artwork and other materials from my car. I know from both Vicki Aznaran and Jesse Prince that Miscavige actually claimed to them that he had these things in his possession after they were stolen my car, which was during the Armstrong videotape operation in the fall of 1984, so I trust you won’t pretend the theft didn’t happen. Just help me get my things back from Miscavige, okay?

http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/archives/3292

After writing you, I remembered that Jesse Prince had told me that both Miscavige and you had told him about having my things after their theft. I also found this from a 1999 letter to Miscavige that I posted to a.r.s.:

You will recall that a cult operative broke into the trunk of my car in 1984 and stole my briefcase which contained about 300 original pages of my art, almost all handwritten or drawn. You will recall that my attorney Julia Dragojevic wrote to the org demanding return, and that your org attorney John Peterson answered, denying the theft and possession of my things.

Recently I had the happy opportunity to talk with Jesse Prince about all this. Jesse stated that while inside he too was told by both you and Mark Rathbun about your agent’s theft of my things from the trunk of my car and your having possession of them. Jesse recalled you describing my work as weird writing. You stole them, you know where they are and you can put your hands on them. Now get them back to me, and be known thereuntil as a thief.

I’m aware that you could be another Loyalist op, Mark, but I’m taking you for now at face value. So far, on its face, what you’ve said, and to me not said, indicates that in the Scientology v. Gerry Armstrong war, you are on the cult’s side.

re: Gerry Armstrong gives his personal experience of Scientologys top Attorney, Kendrick (Ken) Moxon

A number of these factual statements are “Doyle’s,” whom I haven’t met, but who has clearly done some research and fact-checking in response to Moxon/Miscavige/Scientology/Scientologists/cult agents’ takedown of Richard’s (moronymous, onehuman) video.

The one fact that appears to come from me but doesn’t, and which I can’t support with names, times and places, is that I acknowledge that Kendrick Moxon is aware of hundreds of suspicious deaths that have occurred within the organization. I don’t know if there have been hundreds of suspicious deaths, or to whom any of the cult’s death are suspicious.

Scientology is certainly evil, Moxon is undeniably involved in the suppression and destruction of human rights on a massive scale for the cult, and he cannot but be aware of many of the cult’s and many of the cult’s cultists’ crimes, and torts, and lies, and perversions, but I cannot make such assertions regarding his awareness of the cult’s suspicious deaths.

Thanks to everyone who speaks up in the Scientology v. Armstrong war, and in the greater War on Wogs (WoW!).

Youtube kerfluffle

I’ve looked over what someone posted as the text of my short comment about Kendrick Moxon, and I haven’t found anything that is even slightly untrue, or defamatory.

Moronymous: So Gerry, I heard you know Ken Moxon.

Gerry: Yeah. I knew Moxon.

I don’t know that I knew him very well or partly at all while inside the organization.

I knew OF him because he had a tremendous reputation inside as an unindicted co-conspirator in the US federal government’s criminal case against scientology’s intelligence personnel.

Moxon presented a knowingly false handwriting exemplar to the FBI to try and derail their criminal investigation of Scientology. After I’d left the organization, Moxon of course has moved up and out of the GO (Guardian’s
Office) and is now really Scientology’s key in-house attorney and is close to Miscavige, close to dirty tricks within the organization. He is the attorney of record in my own case, he has participated in the Lisa Mcpherson case, and has been involved in taking my deposition in my own litigiation and in the Lisa Mcpherson litigation, and we have sparred on a number of occasions. I find him to be a deceitful and corrupt and conscienceless individual.

He knows … Ken Moxon knows … that what he is supporting is evil. Ken Moxon knows that Miscavige is a liar, knows that Hubbard was a gargantuan liar. Moxon has been involved in immoral criminal activities for the cult.
Moxon is involved in the suppression and destuction of human rights in a very big way.

I understand that who Moxon is is God’s son, just as everyone else is God’s son, and that God’s son cannot be corrupted and cannot have his conscience totally removed, even if that is Scientology’s goal. I mean with the statement that I find Moxon to be a deceitful, corrupt and conscienceless individual that this is the ego identity he’s been dramatizing. I was simply trying to write in a convention that everyone could understand, without everyone having to understand something other than what I was writing.

It is true that I can’t possibly know with total certainty that Moxon knows that what he is supporting is evil. It seems impossible that he doesn’t know, given his intelligence, profession and known activities. There is certainly all kinds of evidence, philosophical, psychological and physical that what Moxon is supporting, specifically the cult headed by David Miscavige, is evil. In his position as in-house counsel for the cult, I would argue, Moxon could not but know of all of that evidence. He has, moreover, never provided any evidence whatsoever to demonstrate that what he is supporting is *not* evil.

Again, it is impossible to me that a licensed attorney, unless he is insane or otherwise incompetent, which neither Moxon nor Scientology have claimed, could not know that Miscavige is a willful and monumental liar. If I can easily demonstrate that Miscavige is such a liar, just from his public and sworn statements, Moxon, who is much closer to DM than I am, and must have access to many more of his statements than I do, should be able to that much more easily demonstrate, and therefore know, that DM is a colossal liar.

Moxon, as an attorney of record in the Scientology v. Armstrong litigations, similarly cannot but know that cult founder L. Ron Hubbard was judicially declared “virtually a pathological liar.” That’s equivalent, not just literarily, I firmly believe, with Hubbard being a garganutan liar.

As for Moxon being involved in immoral criminal activities for the cult, and involved in the suppression and destuction of human rights in a very big way, the Scientology v. Armstrong war and litigation demonstrate Moxon’s involvement in these evils. I do not buy the excuse that Scientologists don’t know what they’re doing, when they seek to suppress and destroy human rights, especially Scientologists like Moxon who use the wog justice system to accomplish this evil purpose.


Vancouver tailing incident