Archive for admin

author photo

Advancing Religion

“DO, yourself, much MORE CHARGING, and you will WIN.”—LRH

Among all the astonishing incidents I’ve been in at Scientology protests or pickets, this is astonishing.

It was August 21 at the Vancouver org in the early afternoon, a perfect summer day and there were 8 or 10 of us, excellent wogs all, protesting our masks off.

Except perhaps to quibbling orienteers, the org is on the northwest corner of Hastings Street and Homer Street. Most of the protesting, flyering, dancing, cake, etc. happens  at the front entrance on Hastings, which runs more or less east and west.

gmaps-homer-hastings-1

There’s a side entrance into the org on Homer, which runs more or less north and south. Go south and downhill a block and a bit and you reach Burrard Inlet. That day, the Coral Princess was in town.

2010-21aug-01

There’s also an entrance from the alley at the rear of the building. Some of the Scientologists use the side or rear entrances during protests to avoid having to confront the evil SP protestors, and I suppose to avoid too having to shatter us. The protestors, of course, know about the Scientologists’ covert entrances and often catch them coming and going despite the Scientologists’ best avoidance tech.

I sometimes walk around during protests and check out the org’s building, the condition of the paint or bricks, accumulations of dirt, weeds and other crap, or anything new or interesting, and I sometimes take photos.

2010-21aug-02

2010-21aug-03

On that occasion, I started wandering downhill on Homer and spotted 3 Vancouver Scientologists, who, I’m pretty sure, were staff members, at the side entrance, waiting for someone to let them in.

2010-21aug-04

It was a clear organization failure that these 3 Vantologists were stranded on the sidewalk out in the open where the SPs could see them, but I didn’t rub it in at all. There were 3 ladies and they turned their backs to me, as Scientologists often or standardly do when SPs like me are somewhere near. I took a pic without much of an attempt to engage them in conversation as I passed by.

2010-21aug-05To me, it was pretty goofy that these people were waiting enturbulatedly at a locked door when they could walk in through the unlocked front entrance. This sort of thing happens in Scientology when some in-charge, or org program director, or the cult head himself, issues an order, which was probably dumb to begin with, but doesn’t get changed even when it becomes clear it was dumb.

So here, for example, org personnel had at one time been ordered to use the side entrance during protests, since, someone observed, protestors are always at the front. Except, the protestors, who include, I’m sure, rocket scientists, had actually figured this stratagem out. And sometimes, as on this occasion, because the doorman who has to unlock the door when someone knocks has left his post, the knockers are left knocking.

After passing the ladies, I turned into the alley at the back of the org, which runs more or less east and west between Homer and Richards Street. The buildings on both sides of the alley have some well worth viewing graffiti, although the constant and oppressive urine smell doesn’t make it a destination for many tourists. That block of alley was recently paved, but the paving hadn’t reduced, and probably increased, the pissoir problem. Well, there hadn’t been a good rain really in some weeks. The org’s rear entrance is arrowed in this pic, which looks from the Homer corner down the alley to Richards. 2010-21aug-06

As I entered the alley, I noticed a guy standing if the rear entrance, which was open, and he noticed me. The rear entrance was doubtlessly a truck loading dock or platform in the building’s pre-Scientology history.  There’s a drop of about 2 feet straight down to the asphalt. I think the building, which is brick, and actually a few bricks loose of an ideal org 2010-21aug-07, used to be Peoples Credit Jewellers.

It isn’t very often that org personnel appear at the rear entrance, and I thought it was a good image and began to frame it, when the guy yelled at me something like, “Don’t you dare photograph her. She’s doing a religious practice.” Then immediately he jumped down into the alley and charged at me. 2010-21aug-08 He had a black shirt and tan pants and a ring of keys on his belt, so I thought he was probably security.

He ran right at me and threw a palm-first punch at me, stopping just an inch or two from my face. I remember he had what seemed then immense hands, and he was a big guy, much bigger then I am. I think my camera was somewhere near my eyes, because I got the idea of him smashing it into my face.

As he charged me and punched at me, he yelled again something like, “She’s doing a religious practice. Don’t you dare photograph her. She’s on a religious practice.” He repeated this theme I believe four times during our confrontation, which lasted a maximum of half a minute.

I held my ground reasonably well as he charged, punched, and then held his hand in my face for a couple of seconds. His body seemed to shake as if he was restraining himself with great will power from totally shattering me.  I was actually dumbfounded, and rendered virtually speechless, even though I thought of saying something about not laying a finger on me  not to touch me because legal repercussions. Mainly I was trying to divine what he was so charged up about.

My first thought was that he was talking about one of the 3 ladies I’d just walked by and photographed at the side entrance. I supposed in a flash that he could have been instructed that waiting outside a church is religious practice, or religious exercise, and that photographing a person waiting at a church was a crime, and he could punish that crime. But I also reasoned in another flash that even if waiting was a sacrament, photographing waiters on public sidewalks, or even from public sidewalks, couldn’t conceivably be a crime, or violate any of the waiters’ rights, most definitely their right to wait.

In a couple more flashes, however, I realized that the guy was referring to a runner, a 2010-21aug-09young lady, who was just then turning around at the other end of the alley at Richards and running back to the org. The guy realized I had just cognited that it was the runner he’d been talking about, and he positioned his body in the alley between me and the young lady.

Because of this Scientology bad religious cop’s severe aggression, and the incredibleness of this data, I wanted to get a pic of his face, but he knew this so kept his back turned to me. I waited him out, however, and my camera was ready when he glanced back once to check on me.  A Scientology PI had similarly charged me with his head down in 1982, and tried to keep his back to me to prevent a photo of his face.

Then I got a pic of the alley Scientologist holding me back as the running lady approaches in the alley. 2010-21aug-10 By this time, I’m thinking that she’s probably on the Purif, Scientology’s “Purification Rundown,” and this is her running step. She could have been running laps in the alley as punishment, as laps are run in the RPF, but it seemed most likely that she was running as part of the Purif Program she’d bought.

Scientology inventor L. Ron Hubbard stated in scripture that the purpose of running on the Purif is “to get the blood circulating and the system functioning so that impurities held in the system can be released and are pumped out.” Running, of course, necessarily increases respiration, over, for example, walking. And running in the alley, which increased the inhalation of the pissy, reeking alley air, just to avoid SPs, felt sad and cruel to me.

The young lady quickly arrived at the rear entrance, the guy directed her inside, and she leapt up the loading platform and disappeared into the org.2010-21aug-11The guy strode right behind her, also leapt up and closed the rear doors behind him.

I’m a runner, and I do much of my running in the mountains on trails, but sometimes I run around cities, including Vancouver.  I’ve related my running experience to Scientology’s Purif, and written down some of my thoughts. In the late 1970’s at the int base at Gilman Hotsprings I actually did the program. Then in the late 1980’s I picked up running, without the rest of the Purif. Running honestly works! Scientology honestly doesn’t.

2010-21aug-12There are runners I’ve encountered who viewed running as a spiritual experience, or even as their own personal spiritual experience, particularly I think trail runners. My position is that spirituality in running is as spiritual as spirituality can be in any other human activity. But no matter how spiritual we runners thought running was, or even if some runners thought it was religious practice, nobody ever thought runners were not to be photographed.

This poor guy had been given this whacky computation that he aligned with his SP doctrine implant, resulting in his bizarre and dangerous behavior. The doctrine had left the 3 ladies in waitingness. The young lady’s need to do her running step when aligned with the SP doctrine made her run back and forth in the stinking alley, and leap inside to avoid friendly fellow Canucks. There are all sorts of friendlier places and safer spaces to run to from the org if people need to get their blood circulating and their system functioning.

Good question: “Hey Gerry, what’s the deal with you and Nancy Many and CAST?”

Victims of Scientology’s Sea Org operation are being referred to the Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking (CAST) in LA for legal and social service help. I contacted the referring person Nancy Many because I meet the criteria and need legal help, and other offered social services. She asked me a prepared set of screening questions and cleared me for CAST’s help.

Caroline and I then did some checking around and discovered a number of connections between Scientology, including OSA personnel, and CAST and its execs.  Major CAST funding was arranged by Diane Watson, a Scientologist and US Representative from California’s 33rd District. I alerted Ms. Many and posted what we were finding to Scientology-related forums. Ms. Many’s e-mail exchange with me ended in a threat that I take seriously, and consequently I will be making our correspondence public.

Because ex-SO people are being referred to CAST as human trafficking victims, this matter relates to the Headley v. Scientology human trafficking case that was just dismissed on summary judgment in US Federal District Court in LA.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22419969/Claire-Headley-Defendants-Motions-to-Dismiss-and-Strike-Out

Much of the information Caroline and I discovered up to a point we’ve posted in this thread on Operation Clambake:  http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=32760

There are discussions on Why We Protest and Ex-Scientologist Message Board that contain the same basic information plus some attacks and some support:
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/24-fair-game-reports-personal-experiences/alert-cult-compromises-human-trafficking-help-group-70673/

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?p=461168

Caroline and I have continued to gather information on this situation, all of which adds up to something fishy and scary. There’s an effort, which includes people who should know better, to discount the Scientology – CAST connections and their implications, to dispense with this as wild speculation, dispense with me as a wild speculator, keep the referral line going. It hasn’t been properly understood that I am the client and so far the only identified victim in this situation.

We’re making these videos to present further evidence we’ve assembled, and to answer various questions that people have asked or respond to certain charges. We urge people to do their own research, and if they have a question for me to ask.  If it’s a good question, I’ll answer.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

Part 11:

Part 12:

Part 13:

Video: Narconon escapee David Love talks with Armstrong

To Mike Rinder

Dear Mike:

Your message “Where Is Heber?” inspired me to write. He’s my ex-stepfather-in-law, of course, and we go back to the 70’s, about as long as you and I go back.

I wanted to communicate civilly, because it is important to me that something be done about the Scientology v. Armstrong, et al. war. Lies maintain the war. You remember, I’m sure, when I spoke to you about your black PR, saying to me that you — meaning you, Miscavige, Scientology, the attorneys, the PIs, et al. — were going to keep right on black PRing me until I shut up. Okay, I’ll shut up and you start your message:

WHERE IS HEBER?

by Mike Rinder

After watching the AC 360 series many have wondered: “Where is Heber?”

Not me. I wondered, and outright asked, “Where is an honest Scientologist?” LFBD

And I again ask, where is an honest Scientologist? LFBD

Or at least, where is a Scientologist courageous enough to want and seek to be honest? LFBD

A Scientologist could start off as a fully loaded liar, I suppose, and then start throwing the lies away on a gradient, or lie-by-lie, when, for example, confronted with a lie, or reminded of a lie. I think though that conducting a mental examination for the lies in the load and getting rid of them en masse, or at least getting rid of chunks or chains of lies, is probably the process by which both homo sapiens and homo scientologicus get honest, if getting honest is possible. I think of the Damascus Road when imagining some Scientologist getting honest.

In any case, I’m asking where’s an honest Scientologist? And I’m asking you, Mike, and every Scientologist. Heber seems about as unlikely to be the first honest Scientologist, as Tommy Davis or David Miscavige. But the invitation goes out to Heber as well, and Davis and Miscavige.

To be honest, I realize, a Scientologist would have to be reborn as a wog, or somehow successfully make it through to the wog state or species. Being an honest wog, the person, naturally, couldn’t be an honest Scientologist, which, so far has been shown to be a perfect oxymoron. 8 million to 0.

Although they can’t be truly honest, virtually any Scientologists, I’m certain, while still Scientologists, can understand the concept of honesty, and understand what I’m looking and asking for.

Scientologists truly know, moreover, how to become honest, which is inarguably simple: just by dumping or shedding their load of lies. And Scientologists, I’m also certain, except, acknowledgedly, possibly the certifiably deranged, know when they’re lying. They know when they’re lying just as, acknowledgedly, virtually all uncertifiable wogs know when they’re lying. Scientologists, just like wogs, know when they’re adding to their lie load, know all the lies in the load, and know they’re all lies.

That means, Mike, I’m treating you as a knowledgeable equal. I’m not inviting pretended ignorance, although I’ll probably know it when I see it. It is principally Scientology in their lives that Scientologists are loaded with lies about, including Scientology’s effect on their lives and others’ lives. Because of this demonstrable fact, rejection of the entire subject from their lives is the most rational handling. It is, of course, reasonable to retain and employ Scientology, as I have, as a completely rejected subject.

His absence was magnified by who Miscavige did send forth as cannon fodder to respond to his crimes: four obviously rehearsed ex-wives who made fools of themselves by repeating lines given to them by Miscavige and received unanimous derision on the AC 360 blog; “Teflon” Tommy Davis who has been caught in more lies than Baghdad Bob and looks more and more like (dare I say this, after he made such a big point about me selling cars for a living) a sleazy used car salesman; and a bored, disinterested looking NON Scientologist tax attorney there to field the “tough” questions about Scientology tech and policy that Tommy couldn’t handle. As everyone knows, Heber is far more accomplished, competent and likeable than any of Miscavige’s new puppets.

At what is Heber far more accomplished? LF

Telling lies.LFBD F/N

In Heber’s and Tommy’s position, what were you accomplished at? LF

Telling lies. LFBD F/N

So you’re saying forked tongued and silver spoon mouthed Tommy Davis is far less accomplished at telling lies than the more silver tongued, and, yes, silver haired, Heber.

I’m sure that with your acknowledgement of Tommy as a lying failure, who’d been caught in a stack of lies, you were hoping that you’d be thought of as a more accomplished liar than Tommy. From your message, it’s pretty clear you hoped you’d be seen as closer to Heber in your lying accomplishment and competence, and your likeableness.

To be a competent liar, in the paradigm you’re positing, your lies would have to be accepted as the truth, or appear to be the truth, or at least not sound like outright lies. To be a competent liar for Scientology you couldn’t get caught in your lies, as you observe about Tommy.

If you’re a really accomplished liar, and, unlike Tommy Davis, don’t get caught in a load of lies, it’s likely you also come across as more likeable than he does. Heber’s either unwilling now to tell the required lies, or he’s being kept from telling them. That makes him perhaps more likeable, certainly to Scientology’s victims, than Tommy, who’s out here lying his forking tongue off.

I’m sure it seems to feel better to postulate that under Miscavige Scientology’s spokespersons have degraded or degenerated, or become less accomplished, less competent, and less likeable. But that is, I believe, a ridiculous proposition that has no real support in known facts and statistics.

It is abundantly clear that wogs’ knowledge of Scientology and Scientologists has increased, arguably dramatically, over the Heber-Davis and Hubbard-Miscavige periods. It has to also be evident that the number of wogs possessing and sharing that increased knowledge has increased.

I also believe it can be shown that the actual issues are being asked about more frequently, indicating an increasing understanding by more wogs of these issues. It’s also observable, I believe, that there’s an increasing intention and ability among many wogs to bypass Scientology spokespersons’ avoiding and cloaking of these actual issues.

Scientology spokespersons have always done what they could to hide and cloak the issues, of course, and all the reporter TRs give them the tech for that purpose. I’m sure you’d agree that Heber, besides appearing to be a far more accomplished and competent liar, also appeared far more accomplished and competent than Tommy at hiding, cloaking and avoiding the issues. Being able to avoid the actual issues certainly makes a spokesperson likeable to people who want the issues avoided, that is, their Scientology bosses.

Successful avoidance of the actual issues also means you don’t have to lie about them. Or at least you don’t have to continue to lie about the issues beyond the lies you told in order to get the issues avoided. Lying is often present during Scientologists’ efforts to avoid the issues, of course, because lying about the issue to be avoided is how most issues are avoided. Tommy’s walking out of an interview when asked about an issue – Xenu – without saying anything, is not an issue avoidance practice that will work for many issues with many interviewers.

Despite all Scientology spokespersons’ avoidance tech, however, disconnection is being probed. So are coerced abortions. So is Miscavige pummeling people. Tommy can’t now avoid these actual issues, because he has to talk to media people who know the issues, and some will probably have the courage to bypass his reporter TRs. Not being able to avoid the issues, Tommy can only lie: disconnection as such doesn’t exist; coerced abortions are voluntary; so’s the RPF; and Mr. Miscavige has never punched, kicked, choked, bashed, battered, beat, boxed, bruised, buffeted or butted anyone; in fact here are dozens of affidavits swearing that Mr. Miscavige is the most compassionate person in the universe and wouldn’t hurt a fly.

The most important issue that is beginning to be looked at and asked about, and I would argue is spreading into wog society consciousness, is the “Suppressive Person” doctrine. All the world’s Scientologists hiding, cloaking and avoiding the issue will not now keep the SP doctrine from being raised and probed, and probably pilloried for the indefensible evil it is. What do the most accomplished, competent and likeable Scientology reps do when an issue can’t be avoided? LF

They lie. LFBD F/N

Just like when Tommy can’t avoid the issue of Miscavige battering people. Tommy lies. F/N

I submit that your conclusion that Tommy (if you’re being honest in this matter) is far less accomplished, competent and likeable than Heber, or the ex-wives, Norman, Guillaume, Monique, or the other DM puppets as you call them, is erroneous. Tommy and the others are made to appear less accomplished, competent and likeable than prior spokespersons because wogs and wog society have advanced in their relationship with Scientology and Scientologists, whereas the Scientologists who interface with wogs have not advanced or evolved, but have been kept retarded.

I believe that if you went back to the cult, Mike, and were again the spokesperson, you would come across as a hopelessly unaccomplished, incompetent and unlikeable liar. I think the same is true of Heber if he was put back on post dealing with wog media.

The whole time you were Scientology’s spokesperson, I knew you were a liar, and of course a crumby cloaker and avoider of the issues. I’ve known from before I left the cult that Scientology’s spokespersons, Heber included, were willful liars, and bullies and manipulators in the service of monstrous men. But now there are millions of wogs with a clue, including people, in media and elsewhere, that Scientology’s spokespersons have to talk to.

I think there isn’t a devolutionary dwindling spiral in society, as all Scientologists postulate (making themselves, by the way, basic chaos merchants), but an evolutionary expansion. Relevantly, this is eminently observable in the field of human knowledge. Putting their efforts into being right about the dwindling spiral requires that the postulating Scientologists “experience” the dwindling. It has to be what’s true for them. They therefore ignore the overwhelming data supporting wogs’ evolution, wogs’ genius, and wog’s holiness, and project onto the wogs their own ignorance of the truth they ignored. Projection of the same chaos, and the same ignorance of the truth, onto the same people – all the wogs – is essential to performing the devotion called keeping Scientology working.

Another, and vital, devotion in Scientology, among all Scientologists, is projecting their most terrifying thoughts, the evilest of intentions they can, with all their mental tech and power, project, onto the class of wogs called SPs. I represent the SP class. The SP doctrine that creates by scripture the SP class, is in issue, Mike. So far, you’ve successfully avoided it.

In order to constantly “prove” that Scientology works (at reversing the dwindling spiral for them at least, or whatever) Scientologists constantly postulate, or project really, an increasing separation between themselves and wogs. In their postulated increasing separation, the Scientologists are becoming increasingly intelligent, able and powerful, and the wogs, not having LRH’s tech, and spiraling dwindlingly, are becoming decreasingly intelligent, able and powerful.

This mental mechanism of projection, which Scientologists call “clear” or “OT,” shields them, they’re taught, from acknowledging that all sorts of wogs are more intelligent, able and powerful than they are. The Scientologists also do what they can to shield themselves from acknowledging that some wogs have turned their excellent intelligence and ability to understanding Scientology and its actual issues.

No Scientologists acknowledge that wogs have their number, simply because it is impossible for Scientologists to be honest. The lie that wogs don’t have their number is one of the most numbing lies in Scientologists’ entire lie load. Consequently, Scientologists like you and Marty instead conclude, or project, that the cult’s current crop of spokespersons are less accomplished, competent and likeable.

So, where is Heber? Why isn’t he out there representing the C of M?

X – No read.

The answer is simple:  Miscavige hates Heber.  He has said many times that Heber portrays the wrong image of “his” Church.  Heber is too old (but not too old to send to the Hole….).  Heber doesn’t feel the need to dress like a window mannequin for Barney’s.   Heber is “stupid”.  And Heber knows too much.  Unlike Teflon Tommy, who was never at Int, Heber has not only witnessed Miscavige brand physical and mental abuse ™, he has experienced it firsthand.  Miscavige cannot afford to put Heber front and center because he might just tell the truth.

Okay, so it isn’t really because Miscavige hates Heber. It’s because Heber might just tell the truth. You’ve got it. It’s why Miscavige, and Marty, and you, and all Scientologists hate me: because I tell the truth about Scientology.

Now, will you tell the truth about Scientology’s ops, black PR, the hatred, the threats on me for all those years? Are you going to be the honest Scientologist? Or, since that hasn’t been possible, will you be an honest born again wog?

And I know how that goes – me having to lie to the BBC about Miscavige beating people was the straw that broke the camel’s back and I walked out while in London.

In your metaphor, you’re clearly the camel. You’d been loaded up with lies over time, and when one more was dumped on you to tell – about Miscavige beating people – your back broke.

Everyone knows now that your lie that Miscavige never beat you, or beat anyone, is a lie. But what are all the other lies in that load of lies under which you were lumbering, before that one’s added mass broke your back and you walked out in London?

Presumably, you’re talking about walking out from under the whole load of lies, not carrying them around with you with your broken back and all.

I’m serious, Mike. You were involved in intel ops against me, litigation fair game against me, and you loaded me down with a pack of your lies about me. You did it all, moreover, in the service of evil. So how about if you unload those lies from both of us?

(So much for me being removed from all positions of authority and kicked out by Miscavige when he found out all the terrible things I had done – I was the International Spokesperson for the Church and on the Board of CSI when I blew. It is true, I didn’t have a post – but then again NOBODY in management did, and it appears to be that way still as Guillaume Lesevre was presented at the “Barnum and Bailey” March 13th spectacle  as “from International Management”  rather than “ED International” because he hasn’t been on post for at least 5 years!).

That’s funny. Norman Starkey chairmanned a comm ev on me at WHQ in 1978, found me guilty of Joking and Degrading, confirmed Hubbard’s assignment of me to the RPF, and wrote in the Findings and Recommendations:

The shot was commentated by Jerry [sic]Armstrong who assumed the beingness of a Barnham [sic] and Bailey circus ring master, making the shot into a quality degrade.

[…]

Crimes Charge 1

Pleaded guilty. The Committee found him guilty. Gerry was the announcer in the shot and originated playing his part as a Barnham [sic] and Bailey circus ring master announcer which introduced and communicated a quality degrade of the shot.

Charge 2

Pleaded not guilty. The Committee however found him guilty of the charge due to his originating and introducing the Barnum and Bailey Beingness into the shot which brought about a joking and degrading communication of the Cine drills. Even though the the [sic] interested party stated that it was not his intention to communicate a joke/degrade of the shot and that he himself had made good gains from the drills themselves, the shot did communicate a Joke and Degrade and this is what caused the extreme upset to command.

http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/findings-recs-1978-10-04.html

What a pathetic excuse for command, for a leader of any kind, that he experienced extreme upset from a simple, cheerful video of a lighting drill he ordered. Or worse, if the sick and gutless wonder didn’t really experience extreme upset but just had his thuglet elementals report his extreme upset so he and they had a good reason and a golden opportunity to victimize good people. From reports I’ve read, Miscavige does the same thing, dramatizing extreme upset to victimize people and get others to victimize people.

Both Hubbard and Miscavige are Scientology leaders issuing and enforcing Scientology’s leadership policies. Having people, they use them. They’re users of people, as their Scientology scripture mandates. They’re real leaders, so, per their scripture, they consider their enemies, the SPs, need killing. Being real powers, Hubbard and Miscavige make Scientologists dependent on their power, and make those power-dependent Scientologists push more power to them.

Pursuant to their scripture, and by their orders and behavior, what Hubbard and Miscavige wanted or want from Scientologists includes more money, more ease, a snarling defense to their critics or the killing of their enemies. Being extremely upset, obnosisly, is not the more ease Hubbard and Miscavige are owed as “powers,” so these super sensitive dear leaders get to victimize the people who caused them the extreme upset. Hubbard and Miscavige also say in their scripture that they’d like their enemies’ properties conflagrated, or potentially the whole wog camp, conflagrated, as a birthday surprise.

Although their intention is the murder of their enemies, which Hubbard and Miscavige have made in spades, and the torching of their enemies’ encampments, these Scientology leaders have not been able to fully execute that intention, or get others to execute it. An important reason is that Hubbard and Miscavige are not the real powers they say they are. Miscavige is a not quite bright bully. Hubbard was a much brighter bully. They have bully power. But they are also pathetic and cowardly, and countless wogs have their number.

Even though their leaders are being clear bullies and cowards, however, not one Scientologist to my knowledge has ever communicated to Hubbard or Miscavige that the Scientologist wouldn’t kill their wog enemies for them, or burn their wog enemies’ camps, or hurt another in the Scientology cause. In fact, as you know, it is considered a point of honor among Scientologists to not fear hurting people in Scientology’s cause. Scientology’s cause, as you well know, is dishonest and unjust.

Heber bore the brunt of much of Miscavige’s ire over the years.  I have seen Miscavige strike Heber on at least 10 occasions.  Miscavige had dolls made in the likeness of Heber (and me).  These were very elaborate reproductions that looked like ventriloquists dolls. Miscavige would make Heber sit with the doll on his lap and Miscavige would address himself to the doll instead of talking to Heber directly.  This was to demonstrate the “fact” that Miscavige thought Heber “wooden” and “unresponsive.”  (Anyone who knows Heber can attest to how ridiculous this is).  It is all part of Miscavige’s Joking & Degrading and constant denigration of people around him, especially those he considered were some form of threat (and Heber’s popularity with staff and public was a very real threat in Miscavige’s eyes).

I cannot believe that Heber’s popularity with staff and public was a very real threat in Miscavige’s eyes. Heber was for years an accomplished and competent liar for Hubbard, and for even more years an accomplished and competent liar for Miscavige. It was Heber’s accomplished and competent execution of command intention to avoid issues and lie that made him likeable or popular with Hubbard’s and Miscavige’s staff and public.

Accepting that a person’s place on the popularity scale can be a very real threat in Miscavige’s eyes, it would be Heber’s unpopularity with staff and public, rather than his popularity, which would be the real threat. I’m a very real threat in Miscavige’s eyes, and Scientology staff and public universally hate me. I’m not popular with any Scientologist. In fact, Scientologists cannot even grant me credence, let alone grant me popularity.

I think, however, that Scientologists’ popularity with staff and public, to sociopaths like Hubbard and Miscavige, is neither good nor bad, but a fact or circumstance, to be used. The people who stood up to Hubbard and stand up to Miscavige are never good, but always bad, because they refuse to be used. I will always be a very real threat in Miscavige’s eyes, and I will always be unpopular with his staff and public because I tell the truth, don’t avoid the actual issues, and don’t lie about them.

The dolls were even flown to the UK for the IAS event where Heber endured endless cruel bullbaiting at the hands of Miscavige.  I only saw Heber snap once, when after hours of Miscavige brand taunting and belittling ™, Miscavige squirted Heber’s face and glasses with contact lense fluid and then blew powdered coffee creamer into his face. This is the level of behavior of the so called “leader” of Scientology.

Can you please provide the details of Heber’s snapping?

But that wasn’t all that happened at IAS event time.  Heber, along with myself and Guillaume Lesevre were assigned to MEST work.   It was surreal, donning a tuxedo to do an international event and then a boilersuit to do MEST work in the woods next to the Saint Hill Manor lake.  And then being thrown fully clothed in the lake (in November).  Miscavige then decided it wasn’t good enough to be “hidden” by the lake and moving us to do MEST work next to the Stables where all Saint Hill staff walked to eat their meals.  It was there that Heber slipped on a log, fell and quite badly injured himself.  Of course, Miscavige blamed that on Heber’s “out ethics”.

If Heber was not looking at where he was planting his feet, he wasn’t clear.

But most importantly, Heber, Guillaume, you, and every Sea Org member or Scientologist take the abuse from Miscavige in order to continue to push power to him and to continue to execute his command intention. His command intention has two related basic requirements: 1. to get away with what he’s gotten away with, and 2. to victimize people. Hubbard had the same basic needs and intentions. What Hubbard wanted, and Miscavige wants, to get away with is all the victimizing they’ve done as Scientology leaders. Pretty well whatever you’ve done in the Sea Org or Scientology, except for leaving and telling the truth, pushes power to the leaders’ evil intentions.

(And just a final note on the UK, not really on topic – Guillaume Lesevre and I were assigned to clean the toilets and sweep the halls in AOSHUK , watched over by Security Guards – plenty of public witnessed this).

Heber is banned by Miscavige from making any public appearances and isn’t allowed to be in Int events any longer.   So, he has become a “non-person” and is kept out of sight at the Int base.

Heber was the first person from outside the Int base to be sentenced to the Hole.  He was there when I left in March 2007, and for all I know, is still there. I do know NOBODY has heard from him for years.  And while he was in the Hole, regardless of his years of service and his progressing age, he was treated like everyone else:  living in the CMO Int trailer along with 100 others, sleeping on the floor, eating standing up in an office with no tables and chairs and only leaving for 20 minutes once a day for a communal shower in the garage  (unless DM was around, in which case some days there were no showers as nobody wanted to risk DM seeing the SPs in the Hole being frog-marched by security to the garage because it would “enturbulate”  him – though he demanded daily reports to keep track of “juicy” admissions coerced out of people).   Heber was stood in front of the 100 people and “forced” to confess (an activity which I am ashamed to say I took part in) and then derided about his Mormon upbringing and his relationships with other religious leaders (he was labeled a squirrel).  Heber never complained though he was the most senior person in the Hole and the living conditions took a greater toll on him than anyone.

Is Heber never complaining Scientology working or being kept working? Or is Heber not applying Scientology by never complaining?

If Heber was applying Scientology by not complaining, was Miscavige also applying Scientology by giving Heber something to not complain about?

And like everyone else, he was not allowed to communicate with anyone outside the Hole at all.  Not even his own family.  And that for Heber was perhaps the hardest thing to endure.

But he did endure it. And he endured it so that evil could triumph; so that the Scientology power he pushed power to could victimize all the people the power wanted to victimize and get away with all the victimizing.

You did a lot of victimizing, Mike. You victimized me for more than 20 years. Don’t you, exactly like Hubbard and Miscavige, want to get away with what you’ve gotten away with? Isn’t that why you haven’t contacted me and helped me end the victimization?

Marty too has the same evil intention as Hubbard and Miscavige: to get away with all the victimizing he’s done for Scientology. That’s why Marty doesn’t grant me credence and continues to victimize me.

Anyone who knows Heber knows above all else his high communication level and how many friends he has made over many years.  He is loved by so many because it is impossible to know him and not see the goodness in his heart and his real concern for the well-being of others.

He is so good he’d lie his head off in the service of evil. Was it charm?

Note that these are the same words a huge Scientology faction is saying about the littlest dictator: Mister Miscavige is loved by so many because it is impossible to know him and not see the goodness in his heart and his real concern for the well-being of others. A high communication level in Scientology means the most accomplished, competent liar.

What if both Miscavige and Heber are sociopaths, grotesquely willful liars, and that goodness you say you saw in what you thought was their hearts is standard sociopath’s charm? And what if what you say you saw as real concern for the well-being of others cloaks the sociopaths’ frightful cowardice and evil purposes?

I believe the cutting of his comm lines was the greatest penalty Miscavige could impose on him.

I’m reminded of your cutting my comm line to Mike Douglas by threatening him. http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/michael-douglas.html
Now that I think about it, you threatened a bunch of people to try to cut my comm lines with everyone. You black PRed me all over the world to cut my communication lines. http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/rinder-ltr-1994-05-09.html

Scientologists paid you to cut my comm lines, and you were very popular with your fellow SO members for doing as much evil to me as you could get away with.

And I must also note that while virtually every prominent executive left in Scientology has put their name on perjured declarations saying that all that has been exposed about Miscavige’s reign of terror ™ is lies, there has been no word from Heber.  When you stoop to the bottom of the rotten barrel to trot out ex-wives to respond to allegations of mental and physical abuse by Miscavige, isn’t it odd that the person with perhaps the most credibility with Scientologists and with the media ISNT heard from?

Credibility with Scientologists? The best, most accomplished liar has the most credibility with Scientologists? That makes sense. But the most credibility with wog media? That’s ludicrous.

Accepting for the moment that you’re not lying about your evaluation of Heber as the Scientologist with the most credibility with the media, this evaluation evidences Scientologists’ postulated separation between themselves as superior beings and wogs, including wog media, as inferior beings.

To be honest, I’d rethink that evaluation, and that demonstrably delusionary postulate.

So, why is he still there?  Well, read the excellent blog by “Back to Life” recently posted on Scientology-cult which incisively explains the circumstances and mindset that keeps good people chained inside a bad scene.

Scientology is the answer. LFBD F/N That’s what Scientology does. F/N That’s a vital Scientology VFP. F/N

Scientologists applying Scientology make a bad scene. Scientologists applying Scientology keep good people inside the bad scene. Scientologists applying Scientology generate the circumstances and mindset necessary to get people to keep good people in the bad scene. Yes, Scientology is the answer. LFBD F/N

And beyond that, Heber is getting extra-special attention.  Because of his popularity and credibility, he has to be kept out of sight.  Imagine the nightmare for Miscavige if Heber was ever freed and able to speak his mind?

I suppose that would be interesting. But his mind could be full of lies. Or delusions. And there’s no nightmare for Miscavige if Scientologists tell lies, or wogs tell lies, or they spout delusions. What he can’t handle is Scientologists or wogs telling the truth about Scientology.

Since Scientologists cannot tell the truth about Scientology, it falls to wogs to tell it. And those are the people that give Miscavige nightmares. They’re the same people that give all Scientologists nightmares, you and Marty included. You share the identical nightmares with Miscavige: honest wogs speaking their minds.

That is why you don’t see Heber.

And yes, something DOES need to be done about it.  He is 76 years old, has served LRH and Scientology with distinction and dedication for many decades and in the winter of his body’s life should be living a peaceful existence, pursuing activities that give him pleasure.

Remember, for Heber, serving Hubbard and Scientology with distinction and dedication, was lying. Serving Miscavige and Scientology is the same thing. You can’t serve Hubbard and tell the truth.

For decades, getting away with what he’d gotten away with – avoiding issues, lying, bullying, victimizing good people – was what gave Heber pleasure. It’s the same with every Scientology spokesperson. It was pleasure because, to Scientology spokespersons, successful lying, victimizing, etc. meant the avoidance of the pain that Hubbard, Miscavige or their enforcers inflicted if the spokespersons failed to avoid the issues, failed to get away with their lies, or failed to bully or victimize their targets.

So, if you have an opportunity, ask Scientologists, the media, law enforcement or anyone else who may have an interest:  “Where is Heber Jentzsch, the President CSI?”

But infinitely more importantly, ask everyone, “Where is an honest Scientologist?” LFBD

Happy Birthday Anonymous

The Way To Happiness, A Most Subversive Document

Download handout

Scientology head L. Ron Hubbard wrote “The Way To Happiness,” which he called the “morals booklet,” in 1980, while hiding out in California. He’d gone into hiding principally to avoid people seeking justice for injustices he’d perpetrated, or seeking the truth from him.

He sent the manuscript and orders for its publication and exploitation to his “Senior Personal Public Relations Officer” Laurel Sullivan. In Flag ED 2119 dated 4 Feb 1981, Laurel provides what Hubbard stated was the purpose of the booklet and its exploitation program: “to improve morals over the world and create a hand to hand subversion of an immoral society.”

The Sydney Morning Herald: Scientology critic adds volume to inquiry call

Source: smh.com.au/national/scientology-critic-adds-volume-to-inquiry-call

NICK O’MALLEY INVESTIGATIONS

January 23, 2010

A LEADING critic of Scientology is to travel to Australia to support Senator Nick Xenophon’s campaign for an inquiry into the tax-exempt status of the church.

Gerry Armstrong was an ardent believer in the church and its founder, the science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard, until he began researching an authorised biography of his hero in 1980. [Full story...]

Also in Brisbane Times

Related stories: Trouble in the House of Hubbard, We are More than just this body and this life

OCMB Media Thread: Australian Senator calls for Fed Senate Inquiry into Co$

See also: Offer to come to Australia to support call for Scientology Inquiry


Offer to come to Australia to support call for Scientology inquiry

Senator Nick Xenophon
212 Grenfell Street
Adelaide, SA, 5000
Australia

Via E-mail: Senator.Xenophon@aph.gov.au

Dear Senator Xenophon:

I’m writing you because someone has offered to fly me to Australia to contribute to the effort to bring about an inquiry into Scientology. I would like to communicate with you, or someone from your office, or someone else you suggest, to establish if and how I can be helpful, and to work out a schedule.

Hey Gerry What About Scientology in Australia?

Gerry Armstrong Post Hamburg Mega Raid Against Scientology Report