Appellate Decision: Leta Schlosser v. Lawrence Wollersheim

July 20th, 2008 • Related • Filed Under

http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/related/230.php

Related

There Are 2 Responses So Far. »

  1. Pingback by WIN! Wollersheim wins appeal in LA Super Ct. No. C332027 - Enturbulation.org Activism Forums on 20 July 2008:

    [...] Filed 7/16/08 Schlosser v. Wollersheim CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO LETA SCHLOSSER, Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. LAWRENCE D. WOLLERSHEIM, Cross-defendant and Appellant. B192191 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. C332027) APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Robert L. Hess, Judge. Affirmed. Counselor & Advocate at Law, James S. Link; and Leta Schlosser for Cross-complainant and Appellant. Barry L. Van Sickle for Cross-defendant and Appellant. Complete Appellate Decision [...]

  2. Pingback by res judicata on 24 July 2008:

    [...] and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, ehttp://www.gerryarmstrong.org/archives/230Labour & Employment MondaqThe Court of Appeal has ruled that a grievance arbitrator does not have [...]

Post a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.