Christo Final Handling Eval
This document in pdf format
LGL
PTL
AUG
81
GPGMO_____
GUARDIAN PROGRAMME ORDER
CHRISTO FINAL HANDLING EVAL
POLICY
Senior advices on Christo.
Nothing in this eval may be interpreted to violate or alter or change HCO PL’s or HCOB’s. Anyone executing a target in this eval in such a way as to violate or alter any HCO PL or HCOB will be actionable by Comm Ev. Any recommendation in this eval or change of policy or tech must be cleared by the Watch Dog Committee (WDC) before being placed in the eval as a target and resulting PL or Bulletin must be reviewed by the Founder personally. All data or handlings where they refer to policy or bulletins must give the policy or bulletin number and its location and text verbatim.
SITUATION
Senior advices on Christo have not been carried out while our legal actions have merely amounted to a shuffle with no win, no prosecutions.
STATS
No Counter Claim ever filed on Julie Christofferson.
No Criminal charges ever brought against litigants.
No criminal proceedings launched against the insti-gators and perpetrators.
No handlings ever done to disprove false testimony and including false PL’s.
No legal handling ever taken against Judge Jones and his actions to make a mockery of this trial (which are assuredly based in actual crimes).
(All the above were ordered by Senior Advices issued August/September 79.)
-2-
Endless Q & A between B1 and Legal over what is needed to bring criminal charges.
The original Christo Eval (on the loss) was done by C.P. in August 79 and was actually not approved. (Point G insufficiently broad sit.)
The Bright Idea of that was “revised” 14.10.79.
The Bright Idea was “re-reviewed” 11.11.79.
Christo Suit was re-programmed (not off an eval) in June 80 and this called for setting up GASes, paying the attorney, Q & A over if we had or could even get enough data on filing criminal charges.
January 81 Opening Appeal Brief was filed by us and virtually is devoid of any attack lines, while McMurry’s response is 234 pages, replete with attack lines on us.
Christo was re-eval’d again recently by CP who did not and would not use R advices. This resulted in a failed mission, cross orders, CP’s disapproval of a suit that would counter the Christo attack (and was based on R advices).
DATA
Christo suit was originally filed in 1976 based upon spurious charges and viscious attacks upon Scientology, its tech and policy (essentially putting Scientology on trial as a fraudulent organization, which is forbidden by the 1st Amendment of the Constitution). No counter claim was filed. The basic strategy was to assert the 1st Amendment protections (which is defensive). From 1976 to 1979 this suit remained in neglect (with USGO Legal directed onto criminal matters after the 1977 raid as a higher priority action (which again was defensive).
| OM COUNTER ATTACK | LEGAL US/LEGAL WW |
| OM HANDLING | LEGAL US/LEGAL WW |
| ADDED TIME | LEGAL US/LEGAL WW |
| WRONG TARGETS (2) | EX DG L WW (CP) |
We lost the Christo case in August 79 with a trial that was a mockery, with tainted jury members, a Judge who based his opinions on data he obviously obtained outside the courtroom, false testimony and known evidence sufficient to support a mis-trial.
-3-
CP’s ordered handling of this was to defend the Constitutional Rights of other religions. This is a Legal Shuffle. This Eval’s bright idea was not approved and rather than re-evalling CP issued another “Bright Idea” which was basically attempting to employ positioning tech, targeting the opposition attorney’s words and legal tactics. This is another Legal Shuffle.
This “bright idea” was obviously also not bright enough as it was again revised. Charles added the R advice on getting litigants under criminal charges before the Appeal to his already existing, incorrect bright idea. The eval was never redone correctly to actually encompass the broad situations that the Advices point out (such as “false testimony exists among Legal Ranks and courts in courts including false PL’s).
| OM OFFENSIVE TO OBVIOUS CRIMES | EX DG L WW CP |
| WRONG TARGET | EX DG L WW CP |
| WRONG SOURCE | EX DG L WW CP |
| OMITTED CONFRONTING AND HANDLING OF CRIMINAL ELEMENTS | EX DG L WW CP |
| WRONG SOURCE (3) | EX DG L WW CP |
| OMITTED EVAL | EX DG L WW CP |
After the trial, but before the decision on the Motion Notwithstanding Judgment, the Judge appeared on radio with Peter Rudie, one of the opposition attorneys wherein they spewed entheta on “cults.” No legal action was taken on the Judge, such as an ethics complaint, criminal charges, mis-trial or a demand for his immediate removal from the case.
| OM OFFENSIVE | EX DG L WW |
B1 was to gather up evidence of crimes by litigants and others per the advices given. Ex DG L was CI to this, stating at the time that B1 did not know what legal wanted, and could not come up with useable evidence. In actual fact, B1 did come up with useable evidence two years ago. This was not used for criminal complaints, but was used to file a civil suit against Christo’s mother, the deprogrammers. This did not name Christo and is not a Counter Attack.
| FALSEHOOD | EX DG L WW CP |
| WRONG TARGET | EX DG L WW and LEGAL US |
| ADDED TIME | L WW/L US |
| OM COUNTER ATTACK EX DG L WW CP | L US |
-4-
In early 1981 B1 collected up further data as per the advices, including letters from deprogrammer Alma Hall to the criminal psychotic Tom Seville which show crimes were committed and show further strings to pull for further, more serious crimes. B1 analyzed this data and packaged it recommending a criminal action and counter offensive suit which could become a counter claim (in the event of re-trial). This was entirely programmed out. CP nixed the Counter Offensive, favoring instead a Jury Mis- conduct suit which is not a counter suit, has minimal viability, but is offensive. Charles thought the purpose of filing such a suit was to get publicity, before the appeal (not to win it). But the advices are to get JAIL sentences before the appeal.
| CORRECT TARGET | B1 (M.V.) |
| WRONG SOURCE | CP |
| WRONG TARGET | CP |
Charles nixed this Offensive Suit on his way to Portland on a Christo Mission. This Mission was called from off an Eval that Charles did (following his removal from post by Comm Ev). This eval came up once again with a situation that was insufficiently broad, did not use the R advices, and once again gave the legal shuffle. His why was that the GASes in Portland were not hatted on attack and so he set out to “hat” them. This hatting did not include all the R advices (and in fact only one GAS saw some of them). CP, who later wrote up 19 pages of disagreements with the R advices, “qualled” the GASes hatting on attacks and refused his Msn Ops order to incorporate the R advices and launch a proper offensive, nattered to the GO Portland staff about having been removed and getting his issues cancelled. In actual fact, Charles sabotaged the actual preparation of the Appeal and the Appeal drafts just turned in by these GASes are an overt product.
| WRONG SOURCE (3) | CP |
| WRONG TARGETS (3) | CP |
The WW staff, US staff and Portland staff were all of the assumption that Charles ethics were handled. The matter of how Charles got through SB WW Qual and Ethics lines is covered already by the second Comm Ev on CP. His mission second (Jere Matlock) returned from this Mission wanting to leave staff and is still on Ethics lines.
| OM PERCEPTION | Those WW/US/Portland staff concerned |
-5-
OUTPOINT COUNT
| OMITTED | ) |
| WRONG TARGET | ) Are the major outpoints. |
| WRONG SOURCE | ) |
The majority are assigned to ex-DGL WW, CP.
WHY
The obvious offensive data needed to start criminal proceedings moving and win this case has never been
utilized.
ETHICS WHY
ACTIVE AND HIDDEN AND CONTINUAL STOPS ON UTILIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF R ADVICES.
WHO
CP, EX-DG L WW
IDEAL SCENE
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS LAUNCHED AGAINST THE INSTIGATORS AND PERPETRATORS AND CASE WON.
HANDLING
BRIGHT IDEA
USE THE BRIGHT IDEAS ALREADY GIVEN US VIA ADVICES AND GET THESE DONE, NO Q & A, WITH CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS UNDERWAY AND CASE WON.
RESOURCES
ADVICES
B1 DATA AND ANALYSIS PREVIOUSLY DONE
M.V. WHO IS NOW LEGAL US STAFF AND KNOWS AND USES ADVICES.
CORRECT CHANNELS ON WHICH TO ROUTE EVIDENCES OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES AND CONCLUSION.
-6-
PLAN
1. Immediately file Criminal Informations with Portland AUSA and simultaneously with DOJ Civil Rights Board in DC.
2. Get the extension already filed on the Appeal Brief Date.
3. Get the Appeal Brief qualling and needed re-write into the hands of MV and get his produced from
R advices.
4. Get the Offensive Suit approved, PR flanking worked out and rapidly filed in Portland for a hard hit against Christo and her cohorts.
5. Push through the Criminal complaints until the product is obtained. This is done in liaison with B1’s current Mission to Portland that will dig up more dirt, feed it to PR and Legal and fully expose the collusion and crimes.
6. Demand that PR tries this suit in the Press loudly and exploiting every Legal offensive and win.
7. Get the Appeal Brief filed.
8. Handle the Portland attorney (he most likely has false data and overts since CP’s Mission). If he does not handle rapidly - like in an hour from time handling begins - fire him and get someone who has never lost a case.
9. Via WUS Asst. get the Portland staff cleaned up fast with Ethics/Qual handlings on the False Data from CP. Meanwhile by-pass these and their GASes until Danger handled.
10. Do likewise with Legal US staff.
11. Get the criminal proceedings carried out and the Appeal filed and pushed to the win.
PROGRAMME:
1. Immediately get the B1 data utilized via Criminal Information complaints: a. One filed with AUSA in Portland in person and ensure the data arrived into the proper hands with impingement. b. Letter off to DOJ, DC.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
-7-
2. The Appeal Brief filing has been requested to be extended. Get this extension.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
3. Get the Offensive Suit filed, with a big PR flank.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
4. From the current B1 Mission, get the data on further string pulls and more serious crimes brought directly to legal, fed into our now filed complaints and pushed into the hands of terminals in DOJ and AUSA who will prosecute the guilty terminals.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
5. Ensure B1 data on JR Jones is used to the hilt as we want criminal proceedings against this judge as well and prior to the Appeal being filed.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
6. Get Attorney Merten to LA as rapidly as can be and get him cleaned up and onto SR advices and firmly on staff and not half way on staff. If he does not immediately come around, fire him and get someone who is with us.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
7. Conditional: Get the new attorney briefed, onto the advices and winning with an offensive.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
-8-
8. Work out via Attorney Merten, solutions to beefing up this Christo Barratry suit (the civil suit filed in lieu of a counter claim). Get it beefed up and on the offensive.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
9. Keep the heat on the DOJ complaint to DOJ. (DC will have to be briefed on this matter and be able to debug on the spot and assist in getting the product we want.) Keep the pressure on this via a PR flank that makes a stink.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
10. PR will have to try these cases (civil and criminal) in the press and very, very loudly. If Portland press won’t carry, get a media that will carry. Use DC PR to make them make a national issue.
__________
DG PR US
11. Get criminal proceedings and get charges brought.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
12. Get the Appeal Brief in, heard and a win on this.
__________
ALL CLEAR IC US
13. Get all named sits as outlined in advices assigned and evalled. Legal will do “False testimony and false PL’s” eval.
__________
AVU
14. Four final targets.
—page break—
G Pgm O 4115-2
Sup: MPC WW
17 November 1979
JULIE’S BACKGROUND
(REF: GPGMO 4115)
INFORMATION:
G Gpm O 4115 lays out broad steps to be taken to document that the people involved in the Christo case are criminals with criminal backgrounds and criminal records and that they engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the organization under the guise of “home and mother”. Julie appears to be pure as the driven snow, so considerable background data on her is needed to give us direction in locating the real facts of interest about her.
MAJOR TARGET:
The criminal background, drug history, record of arrests, former employment, perversions of Julie, fully known and documented, as needed.
PRIMARY TARGETS:
1. Somebody there: West Sec BI US.
2. Worthwhile purpose: To provide evidence of Julie’s criminal nature and background.
3. Somebody taking responsibility for the area or action: WEST SEC BI US, B1 Programmes.
4. Form of the Org Planned Well: West Sec to locate a writer in LA or Portland who is interested in writing a book on Julie. This writer is already at least somewhat established - he has written at least one or two articles, papers or books. CO is either West Sec or AGI Portland. Daily report line set up, and phone calls every two days.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
5. Form of the org held or reestablished: GAS run with tight 8C, and Daily reports READ DAILY, with no BI’s shrugged off.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
6. Org operating: Programme begun on receipt as highest priority
VITAL TARGETS:
1. Security course data FULLY applied to GAS.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
2. Finances arranged immediately so they are there when GAS ready.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
3. GAS gets agreement in writing that his product is of interest to a publisher. (No formal contract needed.)
WEST SEC__________
4. Julie interviewed first, very lightly. Let her know pro-Julie book being written with lots of human interest and theta about her and entheta on nasty C of S.
WEST SEC__________
—page break—
OPERATING TARGETS:
LIBBY/EUREKA, MONTANA
From 1967 to 1978, the Halls lived in Eureka at which time they moved to Libby, where they currently reside. Thus, most data of interest on Julie would be in Eureka as she attended fourth grade through high school there.
1. Go to the Lincoln County High School and meet the person in charge of students. Get a list of people to interview who would know the most about Julie. Get a letter of introduction from him.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
2. Ensure Julie’s pastor, friends, classmates, boyfriends are gotten.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
-2-
3. Locate and interview Julie’s pastor. Find out any involvement of his in the suit, any data he has on Julie’s conduct pre-Scien-tology, leads from him or who else to talk to. Get all the data he has on her background and related subjects.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
4. Conduct as many other interviews as possible. Include her former employers, classmates, Lutheran Church youth group class-mates, teachers and find her boyfriends to get all data about her early promiscuity and sexual conduct. (Session data indicates she had been concerned in the past [next 3 lines blacked out]
WEST SEC BIUS__________
5. List out all strings which have surfaced and pull those which are in this location.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
5. Get affidavits whereever possible; but only on data which fits the major target.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
6. Contact Phil and Farrel LaClaire and interview them for data and other leads to people unfriendly to Julie.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
7. Get any private investigator reports Phil has gotten from the PI he hired a while ago to determine if any data is of interest regards Julie.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
8. C/S Phil on the PI cycle if it looks fruitful and usable.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
9. From above targets, list out further strings which will lead to discreditable data including the following (if not already gotten):
a. Trips made by Julie C.
b. Why Julie came to Portland to “get away from boy friends”
c. When Julie hooked up with Bob Titchbourne (reported to be Setp. 77)
d. Why Julie was married outside of her church
e. any arrest records of Julie
WEST SEC BIUS__________
10. Pull these strings and affidavit or document as possible, data of interest.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
11. Locate the father of Mike____; who claims Mike went to the mental hospital due to Pat Osler giving him hash. This Mike was supposedly friends with Osler and Julie.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
12. Interview him for any discreditables on Julie C. Get affis and leads to others with discreditable data.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
13. Interview Julie’s employer in Kalispell Montana and any fellow employees for data and discreditables. Get affidavits as possible or documentation.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
-3-
14. Interview Julie’s physician in Whitefish, Montana, for any psychiatric connections, promiscuity, etc. Document and/or affidavit as possible.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
15. Review all data gathered in the Montana area and ensure all possible strings have been pulled and documented.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
BONNERS FERRY, IDAHO
Julie was born here 14 August, 1957, and lived here until she was about 4 or 5 years old.
16. CANCELLED.
EUGENE, PHILOMATH, SWEET HOME, OREGON:
The Halls lived in Sweet Home from 1963 - 68: Robert Lethrud and his wife (he’s Alma’s son) live currantly 30 miles away in Philomath. Lethruds were in comm and exchanged visits with Julie about once a month while she was in Scientology. Father Kent Burtner has done ARM work in Sweet Home. About 40 miles south of Philomath is Eugene, where Burtner was until his transfer to New Mexico.
17. Locate where the Halls lived while they were in Sweet Home.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
18. Interview neighbors for data and leads to others in town who would know more about Julie’s later life.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
19. Find the Lutheran Church which Julie supposedly attended and interview the pastor there for any data.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
20. Find someone who was close to Burtner and interview them for any data of interest of Burtner’s contact with any of the people in this case, particularly Julie.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
21. Interview the Lethruds for any data of interest regarding Julie’s early days. Do they have any data regarding Julie’s step-father making advances to her when she was about 5 years old? Do they have any data regarding Alma leaving Julie with “other people” when she went to Europe rather than with the step-father because of what people might think? (Session data.)
WEST SEC BIUS__________
22. Pull any remaining strings and get affidavits/documentation where possible.
WEST SEC BIUS__________
PORTLAND AREA:
23. Interview neighbors and residents of the house Julie first lived in when she moved to Portland. Get discreditable data and affidavits as possible (1035 S.E. Bodwell.) [Bidwell?]
WEST SEC BIUS done
-4-
24. Julie said she went to the Lutheran Church on 10th or 12th Street a few times. Interview the pastor there and see if he remembers her. Get what data would be useable plus any discredi-table data and affidavit.
WEST SEC BIUS done
25. Julie moved from Robin Jones’ house on Bodwell on July 30 to an apartment with Linda Shelly. Ensure Jones and Shelly are interviewed suitably and affidavit as possible any useful data.
WEST SEC BIUS [Joe L?] done
26. Julie worked at the Heathman House while on ethics lines. Interview her boss and fellow employees for data on her and any discreditable data. Affidavit as possible.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
27. The day Julie’s pastor brought 5-6 high school students to Portland to see Concordia College, Julie met them for lunch and drove back to Montana with them. This was the start of her de-programming. Check at the college for students from the Libby area. Interview them from a position of altitude and get any discreditable data or leads they might have. Affidavit any useful data.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
28. It must be determined how Julie did get the job at Tom Saville’s company. Did he know her family?
WEST SEC BIUS done
29. Interview company employees of Saville’s company, Northwest Detailing Service for data on Julie and Saville’s relationship. Affidavit any useful data.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
30. Saville reportedly told Julie that the Comm Course weas making her worse, not better. Get contrary data on Julie affidavited by employees.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
31. Find out why Saville and Julie maintained a comm line after she left his employ.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
32. Find out why Saville threw two parties for Julie who was only working there for two months. (In September, 1975, he gave her a going-away party after all her complaints about what a rotten person he was).
WEST SEC BIUS __________
33. Interview Mrs. Saville suitably for any information on Julie of use. Does she know how Julie got her job at Saville’s firm? Was there 2d going on between Saville and Julie or Julie and anyone else?
WEST SEC BIUS first 2questions done
3rd not done
34. In Julie’s 1975 income tax filing, she made no mention of her earnings from Northwest Detailers. Did Saville have her on the books or not? What was her salary, bonuses?
WEST SEC BIUS done
35. Get access to any Northwest Detailing records on Julie and get any pertinent data from the records illegible]
WEST SEC BIUS done
-5-
36. Get a list of all the Scientology staff and public who knew Julie. Have each interviewed from a prepared list of questions and pull all strings. Find out everything they know about Julie with emphasis on discreditables and/or criminal activities and/or perversions.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
37. Ensure Jessica Marks is interviewed for all her data and leads to others who could give data.
WEST SEC BIUS done
38. Review all data collected and list out any remaining strings.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
39. Get these strings pulled and all useful affidavits collected.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
PRODUCTION TARGETS TO BE SET ON INDIVIDUAL MISSION ORDERS.
—page break—
GUARDIAN PROGRAMME ORDER
Gpgmo 4115-4
26.11.79
SUPE: MPCWW
REF: GPGMO 4115
ALMA’s BACKGROUND
INFORMATION: GPGMO 4115, CHRISTOFFERSON SUIT PLAN, lays out the broad steps which must be taken to document that the people involved in this case are criminals with criminal backgrounds and criminal records and that they engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the organization under the guise of “home and mother”.
Plan Step 1 orders that the criminal background, drug history, record of arrests, former employment and perversions of those involved be found and documented, including Alma Hall.
As investigations will need to be done for Julie Titchbourne’s background and Alma Hall’s background in the same areas, care should be taken to get these investigations dove-tailed so as to avoid duplicative work and avoid any possible double restimulation of local folks. It must also be noted that the Plan states “If it is not possible for BI GASes to provide legally useable data, then private investigators may need to be employed and finan-cial arrangements made - but whatever the case is, the data is to be gotten very rapidly in fully useable form”.
MAJOR TARGET:
The criminal background, drug history, record of arrests, former employment, perversions of Alma Hall known and documented.
PRIMARY TARGETS:
1. SOMEBODY THERE. WEST SEC BIUS
2. WORTHWHILE PURPOSE: Evidence obtained on Alma’s background showing her criminality.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
3. SOMEBODY TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE AREA: WEST SEC BIUS, BI PGMS PROD OFF US, BIPOUS
4. FORM OF ORG PLANNED WELL: See G Pgm O 4115-2 Julie’s Background. The operating targest in this programme will be done using the same set-up.
5. FORM OF ORG HELD OR REESTABLISHED: See G Pgm O 4115 - 2.
6. ORG OPERATING: See G Pgm O 4115 - 2.
VITAL TARGET:
This programme is to be done together with G Pgm O 4115-2, Julie’s background, by the same suitable GAS.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
OPERATING TARGETS:
BONNERS FERRY, IDAHO:
Alma apaparently moved to Bonners Ferry from Spokane, Washington, after World War II. She and her new husband, Andrew Christofferson, a carpenter, moved here. She worked as a secretary in the Welfare Office, holding this job for about 6 months. During the 1950’s she worked for the First National Bank in Bonners Ferry for seven years. It appears Alma got a divorce and re-
-2-
married within a year. She married Berwin V. Hall, her present husband. They lived in Bonners Ferry for about a year, 1961 to 1962 when they moved to Yellowtail Dam, Montana. In 1963, the Halls moved to Sweet Home, Oregon, where Alma worked as a bank teller, then, in 1966, they moved to Eureka, Mon-
tana where they stayed until 1978.
Chances are that relatives of Alma’s three husbands are still in this area (Lethrud, Christofferson and Hall), so all possible leads should be followed to locate and interview these people. Alma still has contacts in these areas as she has called there and visited from time to time.
1. Locate and interview the following for data on Alma’s criminality, drug history (if any), record of arrests, former employment, perversions: (NB: all the following people may not have data on each of these points, so get what-ever data can be gotten without freezing up the comm lines)
a. relatives of Alma’s former husbands (those who dislike her, preferably).
b. Andrew Christofferson himself.
c. Former neighbors of Alma’s.
d. Employer and people who worked with Alma at Nelson Lumber Company from 1949 to 1951.
e. Check with local police to ascertain any arrests records, etc.
f. Check the court house, criminal dockets, for any records of AH
g. Per [...] data of Julie’s there was a time when AH was planning to go to Europe and preferred to leave Julie with “other people” than Berwin Hall because of what people might think. Julie stated in session that Berwin “put his hands on her” when she was about 5 years old (circa 1962). Is any-thing known about why AH felt like this, i.e., did she know about any of her husband’s perversions yet cover them up, disregarding her own children’s welfare?
h. Did AH go to Europe and if so, how was this afforded and why did she go?
i. Pull any other strings that crop up which will get data and documentation of the points on this target.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
SWEET HOME, OREGON:
The Halls lived in Sweet Home, Oregon, from 1963 to 1966 and AH worked as a teller in a bank there. AH’s son, Robert Lethrud, and his wife live about 30 miles away in Philomath.
2. Locate and interview the following for any data on AH’s criminal back-ground, drug history, record of arrests, former employment, perversions (NB: not all people will have data on each point but get whatever each gives you and go for documentation where at all possible):
a. Former neighbors
b. Employer and fellow workers in the bank (if still around)
c. local Lutheran church’s pastor
d. local police and court house for any arrest records, etc.
e. any leads given out by these people.
—page break—
LIBBY/EUREKA, MONTANA AREA:
From 1967 to 1978, the Halls lived in Eureka, Montana, after which time, they moved to Libby, where they currently live. Thus, most data of interest on AH may be here. A previous mission to Libby found it tough going due to the smallness of the community and short comm lines. This must be taken into consideration so all necessary strings do get pulled without alarming any of the local folks.
3. Contact Phil and Farrel LaClaire and interview them for data and leads to people unfriendly to AH.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
4. Interview the LaClaires for data on Farrel’s cousin who was sent to a mental hospital due to suppression from Alma and bad business deals with them which reportedly cost $28,000. Get full affidavits from them on AH’s criminality.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
5. Make arrangements to interview the husband of this cousin for his data on the scene and get affidavits from him on AH’s criminality.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
6. Get any reports which Phil LaClaire may have gotten from the private in-vestigator he hired and see where this cycle stands regarding AH’s shady business deals.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
7. C/S Phil on the private investigator cycle if it looks fruitful and of use to you.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
8. Interview the names gotten in target 3 for data on AH’s criminal back-ground, drug history, record of arrests, former employment, perversions and get affidavits wherever possible. Also get any leads from these people to others who would likely have more data.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
9. Check the court house - criminal docket - for any records of arrests of AH.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
10. Check suitably with local policy re any data they may have on AH’s record or criminal background.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
11. Talk with the local Lutheran pastor about AH and see what he has to say that would be of interest to you.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
12 AH’s financial status must be determined. There are several contrary facts regarding the Hall’s financial standings over the years which need to get sorted out as it is this area which may lend itself to more crimes, etc. (In about 1975, Julie reported that AH and husband were hard-pressed for money and don’t want her to do Scientology as they won’t get Social Security benefits for her unless she goes to college. In 1975, also, AH gives Ted Patrick $2,000 for the failed deprogramming of Julie, in about January, 1978, AH was not “hard-pressed” for money. During the court case in 1979, AH says she “may not have” reported the fee she received for a deprogramming done in Pennsylvania ($450). Attorney Powers says the fees for the case so far, as of July 1979, are $135,522. In March 1978, AH said the Marks case against her would cost a lot of money and she had a lot of attention on it. Her husband had retired but he had to go back to work because they needed the money to fight the suit. Undated and unverified report was that she had probably misappropriated funds from a trust fund which she administers and she and her husband bilked about $25,000 out of the LeClairs in a business deal.)
WEST SEC BIUS __________
-4-
13. A GAS is checking the phone numbers called by AH which she has claimed as deprogramming expenses. Get this completed and check these numbers for leads to interview others.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
14. As this data comes in, ensure the strings are fully pulled, the needed documentation and affidaviting is done and Legal is given all data which is useful to them.
WEST SEC BIUS __________
15. Insure this data gets filed according to GPGMO 4115-1.
CIC SEC BIUS __________
PRODUCTION TARGETS TO BE SET ON MISSION ORDERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH JULIE PGM
-2-
The intention is to see these people in prison or out on bail at the time of the appeal.
It is certain that in other deprogrammings the deprogrammers named below have participated in any damages or monies or awards resulting from their deprogramming. It would be almost impossible for this not to have occurred. It will be used as conclusive evidence that they are in the business to make money and to shake people down!!
B1 WW need to liaise with Legal throughout to ensure data gotten is legally useable and what is wanted. If it is not possible for B1 GASes to provide legally useable data then private investigators may need to be employed and financial arrangements made - but whatever the case is, the data is to be gotten very rapidly in fully useable form.
1. The criminal background, drug history, record of arrests, former employment, perversions of: 1) Ted Patrick; 2) Reid [Reed]Heller; 3) Pastor Gary Burke;
4) Alma Hall; and 5) Julie Hall, AKA Julie Christofferson, AKA Julie Titchbourne. (Programme is to be done for each).
__________
DG I US
US Sec B1 WW
2. The establishment and documentation of any and all connections between Alma Hall or Julie Hall and one or all the names above. a) currently, and b) prior
to July 13, 1975. (Programme to be done).
__________
DG I US
US Sec B1 WW
3. Obtain all evidences of implantation, hypnotism or coercion or compulsion of the above named person in other sectors to establish that they are capable of using hypnotism and implantation to effect the execution of their desires. (Programme to be done).
__________
DG I US
US Sec B1 WW
-3-
4. Establish any and all agreements of participation in suit awards amongst any of the above named persons. (Project to be done).
__________
DG I US
US Sec B1 WW
5. All this evidence is to be assembled with an eye to establishing that Julie Hall was probably a drug addict, probably has a large and extensive criminal background and record and has been party to other collusions and swindles or crimes or felonies possibly from her earliest history. (Programme to be done).
__________
DG I US
LR WW, AGL DC
US Sec B1 WW
6. We also want the similar background obtained on Alma Hall. (Programme to be done).
__________
DG I US
LR WW, AGL DC
US Sec B1 WW
—————–
