The Miscavige Regime: Criminality and
Squirreling Go Hand in Paw
In 1955, Scientology founder L. Ron
Hubbard
issued a policy statement entitled "The Scientologist - A Manual on the
Dissemination
of Material," printed in booklet form in "Ability Major 1." The booklet states
that it was the official publication of the Hubbard Dianetics Research
Foundation
and the Hubbard Association of Scientologists, International, © 1955 by the
HASI
. In this "scripture," Hubbard laid down what was to be his Scientology
organization's
basic litigation strategy:
"The purpose of the suit is to
harrass
and discourage rather than to win. ¶ The law can be used very easily to
harrass,
and enough harrassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well
knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his
professional
de-cease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly."
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1955.html
Images of the booklet's cover,
copyright page
and page 7, which contains this text, are available at:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1955-1.html
In 1971, the American St. Hill
Organization,
a "branch of the Church of Scientology of California," reprinted the same
document," © 1968 L. Ron Hubbard," in a book entitled "Magazine Articles on
Level 0 Checksheet
by L. Ron Hubbard. The only changes in Hubbard's litigation policy for
Scientology
in this publication are spelling corrections of the words "harass" and
"harassment."
"The purpose of the suit is to
harass and
discourage rather than to win. ¶ The law can be used very easily to
harass,
and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well
knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his
professional
decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly."
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1968.html
Images of the book's cover, copyright
page,
table of contents and pages 53-55, which contain this text, are webbed at:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1968-1.html
It is very likely that the original
spelling
errors are Hubbard's, because he made the same error in his "Admissions,"
which
he wrote about eight years before he wrote Scientology's litigation strategy
that
was published in the 1955 booklet.
"I returned to sea as navigator of
a large
ship and was subsequently selected for the Military Government School at
Princeton
whither I went in 1944-45 for three months. During my Princeton sojourn I was
very tired and harrassed (sp?) [sic] and spent week-ends with a writer friend
in Philadelphia."
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/ars/ars-2000-03-
11.html#harrassed
In Volume II of the 1976 edition of
"Technical
Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology," published by "Church of Scientology
of
California, Publications Organization Division, American Saint Hill
Organization,"
© L. Ron Hubbard, the same document was printed, ordering the same basic
litigation
policy, identical in spelling and grammar to the1968/71 version.
"The purpose of the suit is to
harass and
discourage rather than to win. ¶ The law can be used very easily to
harass,
and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well
knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his
professional
decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly."
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1976.html
Images of the volume's title page,
copyright
page and page 157, which contains this policy, are webbed at:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1976-1.html
Volume III of the 1991 edition of
"Technical
Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology," published by Bridge Publications,
Inc.,
© L. Ron Hubbard Library, contains the same "scripture," "The Scientologist -
A Manual on the Dissemination of Material." The totality of the text directing
Hubbard's basic litigation strategy and policy for Scientology organizations,
however, has been removed from the document.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1991.html
Images of the volume's title page,
copyright
page, page 40, showing that it is the 1955 publication in Ability Major 1 that
is being republished, and pages 47 and 48, which show that the key litigation
policy has been deleted from the "scripture," are webbed here:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1991-1.html
Scientology Policy Directive 19, dated
July
7, 1982, entitled "The Integrity of Source," states:
"It is hereafter firm Church
policy that
LRH ISSUES ARE TO BE LEFT INTACT AS ISSUED.
No one except LRH may cancel his
issues.
No one except LRH can revise his issues
whereby
changes are incorporated into the text and then reissued. Any valid revisions
must hereafter be made in a separate issue stating the change and how the
revision
is to be read. It must also state why the change is being effected, for
example,
if there has been an ecclesiastical change or a technical development.
Changes in Church policy become valid
Church
policy by being adopted by the Board per his request in HCO PL 1 Sep 66
FOUNDER
that "I. Policy Letters are hereafter to be accepted or nullified by Boards of
Directors in their regular meetings".
However, the original LRH issue
(regardless
of type) shall remain intact so that the original wording is kept. In this
way,
his writings retain their integrity and there is no mystery as to what he
wrote
and what the revision stated and why.
The only occasion for any revision of
an LRH
issue is if a typographical error was found in the original. Already existing
issues stand intact and valid. Any further changes will be dealt with on an
issue-by-issue
basis. This policy will allow the integrity of Source to be reinstated."
-- http://www.antisectes.net/integrity-of-source.htm
Scientology "ethics" "scripture"
states:
"Suppressive acts [also called "high
crimes"]
are defined as actions or omissions undertaken to knowingly suppress, reduce
or
impede Scientology or Scientologists."
-- L. Ron Hubbard, Introduction to Scientology Ethics, © 1998 L. Ron Hubbard
Library,
294
Scientology's Suppressive Acts or High
Crimes
include:
"Issuing alter-ised [altered]
Scientology technical
data or information or instructional or admin procedures, calling it
Scientology
or calling it something else to confuse or deceive people as to the true
source,
beliefs and practices of Scientology."
-- Ibid.
Scientology's suppressive acts, or high
crimes,
also include:
"Violation or neglect of any of
the ten
points of Keeping Scientology Working, as listed here:
One: Having the correct technology.
Two: Knowing the technology.
Three: Knowing it is correct.
Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology.
Five: Applying the technology.
Six: Seeing that the technology is correctly applied.
Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology.
Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications.
Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology.
Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application."
-- Ibid, 298
It is clear that deleting the basic
litigation
strategy, which in 1955 Hubbard ordered for Scientology and which remained his
cult’s publicly visible litigation policy for decades, is not merely the
correction of a typographical error. Hubbard’s typographical errors
–
or spelling errors actually – were corrected between the 1955 and 1968
printings
of this basic litigation policy. The deletion of a policy of this importance,
that governed Scientology’s legal bureaus and litigation machine,
including
the organization’s wog® lawyers, can only be the issuing of
radically
alter-ised Scientology data to confuse or deceive people as to the true
source,
beliefs and practices of Scientology. The deletion of the following basic
litigation
strategy from Scientology “scriptures” by the Miscavige regime is
a high crime, a suppressive act.
"The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to
win.
¶ The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on
somebody
who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized,
will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible,
of
course, ruin him utterly."
The deletion of this key policy from Scientology “scriptures”
is
also a violation or neglect of every one of the ten points of “Keeping
Scientology
Working.” Under Hubbard, Scientologists must have had what he said --
and
what they believed -- was the correct technology. Scientologists knew to use
the
law very easily to harass people, to use it to generate sufficient harassment
to cause people’s professional death, and to ruin them utterly. This was
the legal strategy by which Hubbard had Scientology destroy its enemies and
flourish
and prosper.
The Miscavige regime’s removal of this policy from what Scientology
presents
as its “scriptures,” on its face, would also mean that
Scientologists
no longer have the correct technology, and would no longer know it was
correct.
Because the Miscavige regime had removed this basic litigation policy from
“scripture,”
this technology could not be taught correctly and wouldn’t be applied,
and
there would be nothing in writing with which to evaluate whether any
litigation
technology was correctly applied. Each of these violations or omissions is a
suppressive
act, a high crime.
If the Miscavige regime really had removed this technology of using the law
to harass, kill professionally and ruin utterly, which was clearly the tech
Hubbard
thought was correct, it would be impossible for Scientologists to hammer out
of
existence any incorrect technology. The technology that would be getting the
existence
hammered out of it is the correct tech. Incorrect applications couldn’t
be caught and hammered, because no application of always-incorrect tech could
ever be correct. The door would be closed on any possibility of correct
technology,
but left wide open for incorrect tech. And the door would also be wide open
for
incorrect application, because that would be the only application possible.
All
of these actions or omissions, as a result of the removal of this basic
litigation
policy from Scientology’s “scriptures,” are suppressive
acts.
The deadly seriousness with which Scientologists view and apply “
Keeping
Scientology Working,” and view violations of its ten points, is shown in
Hubbard’s policy letter by the same name dated 7 February 1965.
"We're not playing some minor game in Scientology. It isn't cute or
something
to do for lack of something better.
The whole agonized future of this planet, every man, woman and child on it,
and your own destiny for the next endless trillions of years depend on what
you
do here and now with and in Scientology.
This is a deadly serious activity. And if we miss getting out of the trap
now,
we may never again have another chance.
Remember, this is our first chance to do so in all the endless trillions of
years of the past. Don't muff it now because it seems unpleasant or unsocial
to
do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.
Do them and we'll win."
“Keeping Scientology Working” is the most used and quoted
policy,
or “scripture” in the cult, and is known throughout Scientology by
its initials, “KSW.” It is included on virtually every checksheet
for every course. See, for example, its inclusion as the first item on the
Office
of Special Affairs' Intelligence Officer Checksheet:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/osa-int-ed-508r.html
Images of the face page of this policy letter, the page containing the ten
points
and the page containing this quote, printed as pages 7, 8 and 13 respectively
in the “Basic Staff Hat,” Volume 0 of the Organization Executive
Course,
published by Bridge Publications, Inc., © 1991 L. Ron Hubbard Library are
webbed here:
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/ksw1-1.html
If the whole agonized future of this planet, every man, woman and child on
it, and their own destiny for the next endless trillions of years depend on
what
they do here and now with and in Scientology, why has the Miscavige regime
violated
every point of KSW and issued alter-ised Scientology data to confuse or
deceive
people as to the true source, beliefs and practices of Scientology? If this is
the first and only chance to get out of the trap in all the endless trillions
of years, why have Miscavige and his cohorts committed high crimes, these
willful
suppressive acts, which Hubbard says will keep us, and them, in the trap? Why
have they deleted from “scripture” this obviously key and basic
policy
for Scientology legal activities:
"The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to
win.
¶ The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on
somebody
who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized,
will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible,
of
course, ruin him utterly."
I believe that all the relevant evidence demonstrates that the Miscavige
regime
removed this key litigation policy from Scientology’s published “
scriptures”
because it orders actions in violation of criminal wog® laws, and
Miscavige
and his gang will do whatever is necessary to stay out of wog® prison,
even
if that requires open, flagrant commission of Scientological high crimes. It
is
by wog® law unlawful to use the law for the purpose of harassment. It is
unlawful
to use the law for the purpose of causing people’s professional decease.
It is unlawful to use the law to ruin people utterly. And it is unlawful to
form
a conspiracy to do so, to order the conspirators to do so, to teach this
unlawful
“technology” and enforce this unlawful “technology”
with
hammering and door closing. I believe that Miscavige ordered the removal of
this
unlawful policy from the Scientology cult’s publicly available materials
because of his guilty knowledge that the policy is indeed unlawful.
The fact is, however, that while Miscavige and his regime have removed this
criminal policy from public “scriptures,” nothing has changed in
his
and the Scientology cult’s legal strategy and “technology,”
and in their application of that strategy and “technology.”
Scientology
still uses the law to harass, to kill professionally and to ruin utterly, all
in violation of criminal laws. Miscavige and his criminal cohorts have simply
removed their actual basic litigation policy from public view in order to try
to escape prosecution for the crimes the Scientology cultists are committing
in
applying the policy.
This “removal” of the public statement of this criminal policy,
but continuing to apply the same policy, while denying that the criminal
policy
being applied is actual policy -- since it is no longer a part of “
scripture”
-- is very similar to what cult founder Hubbard did with his “
cancellation”
of his notorious “fair game” doctrine. Fair game orders
Scientologists
to commit acts that violate criminal wog® laws against people declared by
the cult to be “enemies,” and hence “suppressive
persons”
or “SPs.” Hubbard’s most infamous enunciation of the fair
game
doctrine is contained in his policy letter of 18 October 1967, “
Penalties
for Lower Conditions.”
Tricking and lying to one’s “enemies,” who are also
members
of the same civilized society, is, of course, antisocial behavior, the
behavior
of sociopaths. Depriving one’s “enemies” of property,
injuring
them and destroying them are criminal actions. Suing one’s enemies, if
the
purposes are to harass them, kill them professionally or ruin them utterly, is
also a criminal action. Scientology’s basic litigation policy of using
the
law for these illegal purposes is a facet of the doctrine of fair game.
Organizing
to plan and execute these actions against people targeted as “
enemies”
creates a criminal conspiracy, which is what, as directed by Hubbard, and now
Miscavige, Scientology is.
Hubbard’s fair game doctrine, after he spelled it out in his 18
October
1967 policy letter, was quickly recognized by thinking government officials,
journalists
and citizens as calling for violent, unlawful actions against the cult’s
“enemies.” As a result, he issued another policy letter dated 21
October
1968 entitled “Cancellation of Fair Game,” which the Miscavige
regime
insists cancelled this criminal doctrine. But Hubbard was just fair gaming his
“enemies” with his “cancellation,” just playing a
trick
on them. He “cancelled” the use of the term “fair
game”
when declaring people “enemies” or “SPs,” with the
cynical
excuse that it caused bad PR, but he ordered that the same “
treatment”
of those “enemies” continue as before.
Scientologists in the Hubbard regime knew that the same violent, antisocial
and criminal actions were to be taken against these “enemies,” the
“SPs.” Fair game would continue, but it would not be called by
that
name.
"The practice of declaring people FAIR GAME will cease. FAIR GAME may
not appear on any Ethics Order. It causes bad public relations.
This P/L does not cancel any policy on the treatment or handling of an
SP."
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/sp/pl-1968-10-21-cancel-fair-
game.html
As is painfully well known by the doctrine’s many victims, fair game
has continued as an essential Scientology organization philosophy, policy and
practice right up until today, almost thirty-five years after it was “
cancelled.”
Fair game has continued to be exposed as alive and well in Scientology in
countless
sworn accounts from former Scientologists, continued to be criticized in media
around the world, and continued to be condemned in official inquires and
judicial
rulings.
"Fair game" policy which was initiated by founder and chief
official
of defendant church and which operated to authorize members of church to treat
"enemies" in such a manner as led to filing of criminal theft charge
against plaintiff was sufficient to establish ratification necessary for an
award
of punitive damages."
-- Allard v. Scientology (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 439, 129 Cal.Rptr. 797
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/allard-1976-05-18.html
"From the evidence presented to this court in 1984, at the very least,
similar conclusions can be drawn. In addition to violating and abusing its own
members civil rights, the organization over the years with its "Fair
Game"
doctrine has harassed and abused those persons not in the Church whom it
perceives
as enemies."
Decision, June 20, 1984 in Scientology v. Armstrong, Los Angeles
Superior
Court, No. C 420153,
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/breckenridge-decision.html
affirmed on appeal,
-- Scientology v. Armstrong (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 1060 , 283 Cal.Rptr.
917
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/appeal/283cal.rptr.917.html
"Evidence was introduced that, at least during the time relevant to
Wollersheim's
case, "fair game" was a practice of retribution Scientology
threatened
to inflict on "suppressives," which included people who left the
organization
or anyone who could pose a threat to the organization. Once someone was
identified
as a "suppressive," all Scientologists were authorized to do
anything
to "neutralize" that individual -- economically, politically, and
psychologically."
-- Wollersheim v. Scientology (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 872, 260 Cal.Rptr.
331
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/wollersheim/opinion-1989-07-
18.html
Even though the Miscavige regime’s “removal” of
Scientology’s
basic litigation policy from the cult’s public “scriptures”
constitutes -- pursuant to the same “scriptures” -- a suppressive
act, in reality nothing happened. The policy remains Scientology’s
actual
litigation policy and practice, and is just as unlawful today as it was during
the years it appeared as Hubbard’s directive in the publicly available
materials.
And just as the other criminal aspects of fair game have continued to be
judicially
condemned long after Hubbard’s bogus cancellation of the doctrine,
Scientology’s
criminal litigation strategy continues to be judicially recognized and
condemned
years after Miscavige faked its removal from “scripture.”
"[Scientology] has recently begun to harass my former law clerk who
assisted
me on this case, even though she now lives in another city and has other legal
employment. This action, in combination with other misconduct by counsel over
the years has caused me to reassess my state of mind with respect to the
propriety
of continuing to preside over the matter: I have concluded that I should not.
…..
[Scientology’s] noncompliance has consisted of evasions,
misrepresentations,
broken promises and lies, but ultimately with refusal. As part of this scheme
to not comply, the plaintiffs have undertaken a massive campaign of filing
every
conceivable motion (and some inconceivable) to disguise the true issue in
these
pretrial proceedings. Apparently viewing litigation as war, plaintiffs by this
tactic have had the effect of massively increasing the costs to the other
parties,
and, for a while, to the Court."
-- Declaration of U.S. District Court Judge James M. Ideman dated June 21,
1993,
filed in Religious Technology Center, v. U.S. District Court,
Respondent,
David Mayo, Real Party in Interest, No. 93-70281 in the 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/decl-ideman1993-06-21.html
"This appeal court and the trial court below was used as a
means
in Scientology's pursuit of the "fair game," policy of punishing
those
who leave Scientology without Scientology's approval. This appears to be a
continuation
of the fair games procedure of Scientology to discredit and to destroy and
ruin
an adversary by whatever means available.
…..
Such evidence leads to the conclusion that this proceeding was a device for
destroying
Yanny and any lawyers who chose to work with him. This appeal is the "
Fair
Game" of Scientology infamy at work."
-- RTC v. Yanny, California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District
No. B058291, filed June 29, 1994
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/yanny/opinion-1994-06-29.html
"Declarations of former members and officials of the Church, Gerald
Armstrong
and Vicki Aznaran, revealed the practices and policies of the Church,
including
its "fair game" doctrine and employment of litigation practices
designed
"to bludgeon the opposition into submission," as well as attacks
against
judges who rule against it. The declaration of an attorney who had represented
the Church (Joseph A. Yanny), submitted in an action brought by the Church
against
him and others, related aspects of the Church's "fair game"
doctrine,
including copies of exhibits to demonstrate "the Cult, according to
written
policy, will use any means legal or illegal to subvert and frustrate judicial
process against them, and will willingly and knowingly abuse judicial process
in order to attack perceived 'enemies.'"
Scientology v. Wollersheim (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 628, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d
620
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/wollersheim/42cal.app.4th.628.html
It is amazing, and sobering, that although Miscavige and his regime
“removed”
Hubbard’s basic litigation strategy and policy for Scientology from its
public “scriptures,” they left in a closely related Hubbard
directive,
which shows his criminal intent, and which has undoubtedly shuddered a number
of judges into silence; or shuddered them into allowing their courtrooms to be
used to harass and ruin the cult’s enemies.
" Cause blue flame to dance on the court house roof until everybody
has
apologized profusely for having dared to become so adventurous as to arrest a
Scientologist who, as a minister of the church, was going about his regular
duties."
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1955.html
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1968.html
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1976.html
--
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/dissem-of-material-1991.html
The “regular duties” of Scientology “ministers”
include
any number of unlawful acts for which, pursuant to wog® criminal statutes,
they could and should be arrested. Scientology’s fair game doctrine and
the cult’s basic litigation policy and practice order theft from “
enemies,”
injury and destruction of “enemies, use of the law to harass “
enemies,”
and use of the law to ruin them utterly, all of which actions are unlawful. In
further proof of the fact that Scientology is a criminal conspiracy, the cult
directs that if any Scientologist is arrested for these regular duties, other
Scientologists are to cause flame to dance on the courthouse roof. Such a
threat
and act against a court is itself unlawful.
We have been witness to Scientology’s criminal litigation policy
inflicted
for twenty years on fair game victim Lawrence Wollersheim.
http://www.factnet.org/letters/FACTNewsMay2002Wollersheim.html?FACTNet
The cult’s litigation fair gaming of attorney Michael Flynn, who
represented
a number of its victims, is legendary.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/scientology-fair-games-flynn.html
Scientology’s dishonest and disgusting prosecution of Keith Henson, both
in U.S. District Court for copyright infringement, and in California State
Court
on manufactured assault and terrorism charges, are frightful miscarriages of
justice.
http://freehenson.da.ru/
We have been incensed as Scientology turned its criminal litigation policy on
free speech advocates who sought to educate the public about the cult’s
dangers by exposing such criminal policies.
http://www.factnet.org/Scientology/scinternet.htm?FACTNet
We have seen the cult use the law, and abuse the law, suborn perjury and
co-opt
a bar association, to cause the professional decease of attorney Graham Berry.
http://www.xenutv.com/legal/vex.htm
We have witnessed these past several years Scientology’s criminal
litigation
policy at work in the Lisa McPherson-related criminal and civil proceedings in
Florida and Texas, in sickening efforts to destroy her estate’s attorney
Ken Dandar, and her family, after the cult destroyed Lisa.
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=bi6h8o.3vvefk5.1%40whyaretheydead.net&
oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
We have watched as the cult’s litigation machine, executing its criminal
policy, ground down and ground up Bob Minton.
http://lisatrust.bogie.nl/stories/timeline/index.html
I have myself the personal experience of twenty-one years of Miscavige regime
fair game and criminal abuse of the justice system.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/index.html
In my case, the Scientology cultists have demonstrated that they will,
knowingly
and rapaciously, use the justice system in violation of U.S. Federal criminal
civil rights laws to unlawfully harass, ruin, imprison and destroy a fair game
target.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/ars/ars-2003-08-21.html
On paper, David Miscavige runs the Scientology cult from his position as
“Chairman
of the Board” of RTC. In reality, because Scientology is a dictatorship,
and Miscavige is the dictator, his post title and its location on the
organization
board are meaningless. The Miscavige regime claims that RTC is the “the
protector of the Scientology religion,” containing “an independent
investigatory and policing body whose function is to keep Scientology working
by ensuring the pure and ethical use of Dianetics and Scientology
technology.”
In reality, Miscavige and RTC do their investigating and policing to ensure
the
pure use of unethical, indeed criminal, “technology.” They keep
Scientology’s
criminal conspiracy working.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/rtc-matters-of-concern-1.html
The Miscavige regime requires that Scientologists send reports to RTC on a
long list of “Matters of RTC Concern,” “to help locate
hidden
suppression, infiltration, subversion or corruption within and external to
Scientology.”
This, of course, gives RTC the appearance of opposing suppression, subversion
and corruption and of keeping Scientology “technology” pure. In
reality,
the Miscavige regime is itself suppressive, subversive and corrupt, and what
they
are keeping pure, and free from infiltration, is suppressive and corrupt, and
subversive of what is good, honest and just. Scientologists’ reports to
RTC provide the Miscavige regime with intelligence to help locate, suppress
and
destroy any threat to their criminal dictator’s dictatorship.
As the removal of their cult’s Hubbard-ordered basic litigation
policy
from the “scriptures”demonstrates, Miscavige and his gang
don’t
care a whit about the “change or squirreling of the technology of
Scientology.”
They are themselves squirreling the “tech” whenever it suits their
purposes. They don’t care if in the issuing of their “alter-ised
Scientology
tech” they “confuse or deceive people as to the true source,
beliefs
and practices of Scientology.” It is their clear intent to confuse and
deceive
people. The Miscavige regimers don’t care if the ten points of KSW -- as
many decent duped Scientologists think of them -- are violated. The regime
violates
these points whenever they want, which is every day of the year.
The Miscavige regime does, however, care very seriously about the “
instigation
of destructive activities,” the “willful perversion or corruption
of the tech,” or the “squirreling,” as these apply to their
criminal conspiracy. They want desperately to hammer out of existence and
close
the door on “any actions or omissions undertaken to knowingly suppress,
reduce or impede” their unlawful activities. Anyone who won’t
apply
standard fair game “must be gotten off the lines.” Anyone who
won’t
use the law to harass Miscavige’s “enemies” and ruin them
utterly
will be “rapidly detected and rooted out, and standard tech and policy
restored.”
Hubbard writes in “KSW” that “there is no more ethical
group
on this planet than ourselves”-- the Scientologists. Consider how
“ethical”
the fellow running this most “ethical group” would have to be.
Wouldn’t
he have to be so “ethical” that he would sacrifice the whole
agonized
future of this planet, every man, woman and child on it, to keep his deadly
serious
activity going, to keep Scientology working?