http://www.google.com/groups?selm=bklvfvoq1oomb45gvn5u5nflfukrafjoqj%
404ax.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Caroline Letkeman letter to U.S.
President,
Federal Departments and Congress
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:20:02 +0200
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 198
Message-ID: <bklvfvoq1oomb45gvn5u5nflfukrafjoqj@4ax.com>
References: <jcrrfvonelu7cfkj5bnmbs8k188gng9m6m@4ax.com> <
Xns93A98A53E9DD4ohawerhatmeintokenge@216.65.98.9>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.16.34.12
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.132.47.157
X-Original-Trace: 30 Jun 2003 02:20:05 -0400, 80.132.47.157
On 29 Jun 2003 06:23:01 -0500, steff0@s.netic.de wrote:
>Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in
>news:jcrrfvonelu7cfkj5bnmbs8k188gng9m6m@4ax.com:
>
>> A new letter being sent to all U.S. Federal agencies and officials,
>> state and city officials and law enforcement departments is available
>> on our What's New page.
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/new.html
>>
>> We have also webbed the Hubbard version of HCOPL "Battle
Tactics"
>> written during his GO era, and the Miscavige Reissue, which has the
>> routing for DM's OSA network.
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/pl-battle-tactics.html
>>
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/pl-battle-tactics-reiss-87.h
>> tml
>>
>> Caroline's letter
>>
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/finding-von-stauffenburg
>> .html is entitled "Finding an American von Stauffenburg,"
referring
to
>
>Gerry, please correct this, his name is Claus Schenk Graf von
>Stauffenberg, so that would be Stauffenberg.
You're right. I'm sorry. And I have no excuse. I had even written out
his name some time back here on a.r.s. See below. I had emphasized
his middle name (*Schenk*) because he shared that name with another
gentleman, who was another sort of a hero to me at the time, Robert
*Schenk* Minton. (Among us Anglos, Schenk is a very unusual middle
name.)
[Quote]
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:23:18 -0500, <not@cotse.com> wrote:
><Hello-no-spam@cotse.com> wrote in message
>news:976751530.3a380baaca6c8@webmail.cotse.com...
>>
>> That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely,
to
>> write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon
the
>> opinions of others;
>
>Perhaps you missed the point. The church has taken legal measures to stop
>Gerry Armstrong from doing this very thing. RTC attorney Helena K. Kobrin
>violated this part of the creed when she attempted to shut down this
group.
>Newspapers and magazines are sued when they print critical articles about
>Scientology (in the cases I am aware of, the free-press won the lawsuit).
>
>They appear to violate this creed when it suits them.
>
>basicbasic@my-deja.com & "Safe" point out that the Church
creed
is not in
>the 1998 version of the Scientology ethics book. So, if the creed is not
>part of Ethics, does anything happen to a Scientologist who violates the
>creed?
>
>> No, I didn't murder anyone in the last minute!
>
>Most Scientologists are honest folk, who are merely unaware of what some
of
>their representatives are doing.
The problem is that these "representatives" are the people who
issue
the orders in $cientology. And what makes a $cientologist a
$cientologist is complying with the orders of the people who run
$cientology. Thus the "honest folk" who comprise the people carrying
out the orders end up doing bad things to good people, because these
"honest folk" are run by bad, dishonest folk.
It is a sad historical tale. The honest folks comprising Germany,
tragically, carried out the orders of the bad few who had risen to the
top of the nation's power structure. Thus the honest, good German
folks got bombed and strafed and knifed right along with, in fact in
greater numbers than, the bad few, just because they complied with
their bad seniors' orders.
$cientologists can prevent their overwhelming defeat, and perhaps
obliteration, pulled in by the corrupt, immoral, power mad, insane few
running their cult (for with DM at the helm it is undeniably a
criminal cult), by getting rid of the people who give the orders.
Mutiny is the watchword. Pass it on. $cientology's excellent hope for
survival is mutiny.
Remember the lessons of Rastenburg.
Funny, Count Claus *Schenk* von Stauffenberg.
(c) Gerry Armstrong
[End Quote]
Message-ID: <
epvg3t4gpn2j817jlu0ad0m928asaa457d@4ax.com>
>Heck, superficial Americans,
>yes! Why couldn't you research this at least for a correct name?
Well you're right. Caroline trusted the spelling used in the Mensa
Bulletin she cited to:
http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/%7Esander/mensa/respon.html
and I just c & ped the name, without realizing the spelling was wrong.
But then, Caroline and I are Canadians, not Americans. So you see how
easy research errors are. To our credit we didn't call von
Stauffenberg an Austrian.
> It's
>embarrassing. This name stands for many upright germans as something
>indeed with a meaning. I don't know, how many americans would like to
>comment on Luncoln or Wishington (which where both assholes compared to
>von Stauffenberg, imho)?
You're right, of course. And both Caroline and I try to be good
spellers. And we both are grateful to Germany and the many good
Germans who stand up to the Scientology cult, and who have given us
some shelter and protection during this time. And, of course, we are
not historians or even educated, but we both have an appreciation for
this country's history, and for the meaning of the name von
Stauffenberg to upright Germans.
>Now I wonder, wether you and your girlfriend ever reylly have read
>something about him, or rather got his name only as a figure from
>hearsay.
>It's outright laughable, that you even wrote an open letter, that claims
>importance, with this wrongly spelled name in the header.
>I think, it advices you better, to take your time.
You're right of course. And we've corrected the spelling wherever we
could.
Thanks for pointing out our error.
Gerry
>
>steff
>
>> Colonel von Stauffenburg who attempted to organize a resistance to
>> Hitler among German military and government officials and to
>> assassinate the Nazi dictator.
>>
>> The beautiful beast confronting the Miscavige regime from inside
>> Caroline's signature is a black panther, chosen for its significance
>> to the Scientology cultists.
>>
>> [Quote]
>>
>> There are five ways in which a human being reacts toward a source of
>> danger. These are also the five courses he can take on any given
>> problem. And it might be said that this is five-valued action.
>>
>> The parable of the black panther* is appropriate here. Let us suppose
>> that a particularly black-tempered black panther is sitting on the
>> stairs and that a man named Gus is sitting in the living room. Gus
>> wants to go to bed. But there is the black panther. The problem is to
>> get upstairs. There are five things that Gus can do about this
>> panther: (1) he can go attack the black panther; (2) he can run out
of
>> the house and flee the black panther; (3) he can use the back stairs
>> and avoid the black panther; (4) he can neglect the black panther;
and
>> (5) he can succumb to the black panther.
>>
>> These are the five mechanisms: attack, flee, avoid, neglect or
>> succumb.
>>
>> All actions can be seen to fall within these courses. And all actions
>> are visible in life. In the case of a punishment source, the reactive
>> mind can succumb, neglect, avoid, flee or attack it. The action is
>> dictated by a complexity of engrams and depends upon which one comes
>> into restimulation. This maelstrom of reaction generally resolves
>> itself, however, in one of the five courses.
>>
>> * In Dianetics considerable slang has been developed by patients and
>> Dianeticists and they call a neglect of the problem the "black
panther
>> mechanism." One supposes this stems from the ridiculousness of
biting
>> black panthers.
>> -LRH DMSMH © 1992 L. Ron Hubbard Library
>>
>> [End Quote]
>>
>> Hubbard is, of course, nuts. A person confronted by a black panther,
>> in addition to the five psychopath-approved responses, could,
>> conceivably, confront the panther. He could be there comfortably. He
>> could be there, confront, and communicate, without attacking,
fleeing,
>> avoiding, neglecting or succumbing. But Scientologists and
>> Scientology cannot confront. They are not permitted to communicate.
>> They can only attack, flee, avoid, neglect or succumb.
>>
>> That's why every wog (R) is in mortal danger from this cult. The
>> cultists can't confront! And they're paying big bucks for the
>> illusion that they are better confronters than anyone else on earth.
>> What they're really paying for (that of course they can't confront)
is
>> the acquired intention to obliterate. Obliteration is the EP of
>> attack. That's as-isness!
>>
>> Gerry
>>
>> © Gerry Armstrong
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org