http://www.google.com/groups?selm=epvg3t4gpn2j817jlu0ad0m928asaa457d%
404ax.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
From: Gerry Armstrong <armstrong@dowco.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Rights
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:05:38 -0800
Message-ID: <epvg3t4gpn2j817jlu0ad0m928asaa457d@4ax.com>
References: <976751530.3a380baaca6c8@webmail.cotse.com>
<976760598.3a382f1643911@webmail.cotse.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-233.pm1.chw.dowco.com
X-Trace: 14 Dec 2000 00:14:12 -0800, dial-233.pm1.chw.dowco.com
Lines: 58
Organization: Internet Services
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:23:18 -0500, <not@cotse.com> wrote:
><Hello-no-spam@cotse.com> wrote in message
>news:976751530.3a380baaca6c8@webmail.cotse.com...
>>
>> That all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely,
to
>> write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon
the
>> opinions of others;
>
>Perhaps you missed the point. The church has taken legal measures to stop
>Gerry Armstrong from doing this very thing. RTC attorney Helena K. Kobrin
>violated this part of the creed when she attempted to shut down this
group.
>Newspapers and magazines are sued when they print critical articles about
>Scientology (in the cases I am aware of, the free-press won the lawsuit).
>
>They appear to violate this creed when it suits them.
>
>basicbasic@my-deja.com & "Safe" point out that the Church
creed
is not in
>the 1998 version of the Scientology ethics book. So, if the creed is not
>part of Ethics, does anything happen to a Scientologist who violates the
>creed?
>
>> No, I didn't murder anyone in the last minute!
>
>Most Scientologists are honest folk, who are merely unaware of what some
of
>their representatives are doing.
The problem is that these "representatives" are the people who
issue
the orders in $cientology. And what makes a $cientologist a
$cientologist is complying with the orders of the people who run
$cientology. Thus the "honest folk" who comprise the people carrying
out the orders end up doing bad things to good people, because these
"honest folk" are run by bad, dishonest folk.
It is a sad historical tale. The honest folks comprising Germany,
tragically, carried out the orders of the bad few who had risen to the
top of the nation's power structure. Thus the honest, good German
folks got bombed and strafed and knifed right along with, in fact in
greater numbers than, the bad few, just because they complied with
their bad seniors' orders.
$cientologists can prevent their overwhelming defeat, and perhaps
obliteration, pulled in by the corrupt, immoral, power mad, insane few
running their cult (for with DM at the helm it is undeniably a
criminal cult), by getting rid of the people who give the orders.
Mutiny is the watchword. Pass it on. $cientology's excellent hope for
survival is mutiny.
Remember the lessons of Rastenburg.
Funny, Count Claus *Schenk* von Stauffenberg.
(c) Gerry Armstrong
>
>
>