|
§ What's New || Search || Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact § |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
|
DECLARATION OF KENNETH LONG
of California. The matters set forth herein are based on my personal knowledge.
executed a declaration in the above-captioned case. His declaration was tiled in support of plaintiff's Motion for an Order Directing Non-Interference with Witnesses and Disqualification of Counsel and, in paragraphs 22-31, 33-35 and 38-39, Armstrong referred to several affidavits I executed in October, 1987.
those affidavits is probably found at paragraph 35 of his declaration. There, Armstrong quotes from an affidavit I executed on October 7, 1987, and in which I described my January, 1987 discovery that Armstrong had knowingly violated orders issued by Los Angeles Superior Court. Taken together, my October, 1987 affidavits demonstrate that:
|
|
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
|
of Scientology of California v. Russell Miller and Penguin Books, Limited ("Miller"), Case No. 6140 in the High Court of Justice located in London, England. In Miller, CSC sued author Russell Miller and his publisher Penguin Books for breach of confidence arising out of Miller's use of some of the documents described in paragraph 2 above. Under United Kingdom legal procedure, since CSC had made out a prima facie case for breach of confidence against Armstrong in Church of Scientology of California and Mary Sue Hubbard v. Gerald Armstrong, LASC Case No. C 420153, it was possible to extend that breach of confidence claim to Miller and Penguin Books by linking them to Armstrong. The affidavits, therefore, were required to detail the elements of the breach of confidence claim against Miller and Penguin, and the claim could not have |
|
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
|
been brought without explaining the underlying actions taken by Armstrong.
Armstrong which would prohibit CSC from using information obtained through litigation with Armstrong in seeking legal remedies for wrongs committed by third parties.
State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. DATED: March 26, 1990
|
|
|
|
§ What's New || Search || Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact § |