Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:05:57 -0800
To: Angela Parker <Angela@WilsonCampilongo.com>
From: Gerry Armstrong <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Chruch of Scientology v. Armstrong, et al., New Summary Judgment
Date & Time
Dear Mr. Wilson:
Because of a claimed "mistake" by the shipping company or companies
handling the shipment of the belongings of Caroline Letkeman and myself, including
what I need to complete my opposition to Scientology's summary judgment, our shipment
has been sent to another port in another country. Obviously, I suspect that this
is no "mistake" and that the people who seek my obliteration pursuant
to their policy are involved. I am, of course, investigating as feasible, and
making whatever security arrangements are possible to protect our belongings.
I have no guarantee when our shipment will be reshipped to us, but I will require
at least another month extension for completing my opposition to the summary judgment
I must send my request to the Marin Court right away, so please let me know
immediately if you will agree to an extension of a month.
At 03:54 PM 2/9/2004 -0800, you wrote:
February 5, 2004
1UP-45950 Alexander Avenue
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P1L5
RE: Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, et al..
Case No.: CV021632
Dear Mr. Armstrong:
On Thursday, February 5, 2004, I filed a Plaintiff's Response to
Defendant's Gerald Armstrong's Request for Extension of Time to File
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. I served it upon you, via
regular mail and overnight mail. Unfortunately, we mistakenly used a
regular "overnight" envelope rather than an international airways bill
the overnight envelope served upon you, via Federal Express, was returned.
However, that same day, I received a call from the Court Clerk asking me if
I was willing to have the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment
extended to a later date. I informed the Clerk I intended to file papers
that day indicating such a willingness. Later that same day, I received a
second call from the Court Clerk indicating that the new date to hear the
Summary Judgment is March 16, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. Further, the Mandatory
Settlement Conference is now scheduled for March 29, at 10:30 a.m., and the
Trial date is now set for April 9, 2004.
We will send you a copy of the Court's Order upon receipt of the same.
Very truly yours,
WILSON CAMPILONGO LLP
Andrew H. Wilson