Path: pd7tw1no!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!news.alt.net!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!199.45.49.37!cyclone1.gnilink
.net!gnilink.net!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!news-out.ntli.net!newsrout1-gui.ntli.net!ntli.net!pe1.news.
blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!border2.
nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!zen.net.uk!dedekind.zen.c
o.uk!newspeer2.se.telia.net!se.telia.net!masternews.telia.net.!newsc.telia.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Spacetraveler" <spacetraveler2000@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
References: <40bu21pvlooqjb5dihplobd4486g3lr5bk@4ax.com> <%hHXd.19258$d5.146776@new
sb.telia.net> <422f6fcd$1@news2.lightlink.com> <q1LXd.19280$d5.146915@newsb.telia.net> <2h
n5511vbcmbraurop1gisq14utf6p3rpd@4ax.com> <FOB4e.134123$dP1.471261@newsc.telia.net> <
4252F6C5.12A5E791@aol.com> <i6I4e.134141$dP1.471475@newsc.telia.net> <42535C4E.7B3A42EB@aol.com> <wiO4e.21478$d5.157911@newsb.telia.net> <4253FE50.940
FB77B@aol.com>
Subject: Re: "Spacetraveler" the Scientology extortionist (was: Scientology's request for oral argument
2005-03-03, Scientology v. Armstrong, CA CoA, Cases A107100 and A107095)
Lines: 120
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Message-ID: <dAU4e.134167$dP1.471388@newsc.telia.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:59:53 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.209.42.14
X-Complaints-To: abuse@telia.com
X-Trace: newsc.telia.net 1112806793 217.209.42.14 (Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:59:53 CEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:59:53 CEST
Organization: Telia Internet
Xref: pd7hu0no alt.religion.scientology:150123
X-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:00:09 MDT (pd7tw1no)

"realpch" <realpch@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4253FE50.940FB77B@aol.com...
> Spacetraveler wrote:
> >
> > "realpch" <realpch@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:42535C4E.7B3A42EB@aol.com...
> > > Spacetraveler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "realpch" <realpch@aol.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:4252F6C5.12A5E791@aol.com...
> > > > > Spacetraveler wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > snip
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Don't think so. Gerry for sure does not like all this
attention.
> > If
> > > > he
> > > > > > quits
> > > > > > > >faking, I will quit my counter actions against him.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Incitement to murder,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/4p7cj
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > and now extortion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have the legal right to share my suspicions. The impersonator
> > > > obviously
> > > > > > confusing people, and this is in the line of Gerry's behaviour
as
> > > > observed
> > > > > > in many of his postings. He for instance run from this one:
> > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/5lgcp
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > Spacetraveler
> > > > >
> > > > > You were complaining that he never denied your accusations. Now he
has
> > > > > done so. What are *you* going to do now?
> > > >
> > > > Per your phrasing: Stop complaining that he never denied my
accusations.
> > > >
> > > > Is there anything else to do?
> > > >
> > > > Spacetraveler
> > >
> > > Yeah, didn't you say that one of the proofs that Gerry was
> > > "impersonating" you was that he hadn't denied doing so?
> > >
> > > So there you go. Stop claiming he's doing it!
> >
> > One of the proofs, one of the proofs. How many "proofs" (arguments or
> > circumstancial evidence are my words) do I have left. In addition it is
> > still so that Gerry was not seen responding to posts, when
"Spacetraveler
> > impersonator" actually did his entry. At this time Gerry "came back".
That's
> > also still an argument, because Gerry may think that he gets away with
it if
> > he also posts under his own name.
>
> Uh huh. But it's a silly argument!
>
> > > You could possibly accuse each other poster to this newsgroup, and
spam
> > > the joint with the accusations, until each one gives up, notices you,
> > > and denies it. Then whoever is left over can be the Official
> > > Spacetraveler Impersonator.
> >
> > If that's true that what you say, then is that not the tactics used by
the
> > common critic around here? Did you tell them to stop doing that? Why
picking
> > on me? YOu don't know if "everyone" denies it, how would you know, you
have
> > to assume!
>
> You're spamming the doggone newsgroup!

May I not inform the readers when they are being presented postings of my
impersonator? Did you send your complaint to dizum.com? May I not defend
myself? Do I have to sit and watch someone making a fool of someone else by
impersonating, without me being permitted taking counter actions?

What is your solution?

>
> > Here we are again! You on the side of Gerry, and I on the other side. Do
you
> > also share the deluded opinion of Gerry about that socalled
"deaththreat"?
> > If you do, then well you know waht I think then. If you don't, why do we
not
> > see your query on that? (or I must have missed your query)
> >
> > Don't play games, girl!
> >
> > Spacetraveler
>
> No, I didn't think it was a death treat, just an extremely ill advised
> posting. Freud would have had a heyday with it.

In my opinon you are exaggerating.

It was a parody, to show how ridiculous Gerry's claims are about
deaththreats. The guy is a walking clown, playing around with his
"lawsuits", never being exact and if being forwarded a valid counter
argument that he can not win, he is outta here. But not everyone seems to
notice this, especially those who have covered themselves with reasons why
Scientology itself is bad. If the guy is afraid as he claims, then why is he
out in the open all the time, accusing, ridiculing, and so on.... The guy
is just putting up an act.

Spacetraveler

Thread