"You see, take
a gun (they are all over the place), put a bullet in there (also easy).
Now locate the whereabouts of Gerry (requires some doingness), then go to
him (take a plane, that's fastest), wait for him (at some place), pull your
gun (does not require much musclepower), then aim (some will have problems
with this), and finally pull the trigger..(keep your hand steady or you'll
miss altogether). Easy no?"
In an earlier post of mine it appears that I made dear old Gerry to
say the least feel uncomfortable. So, what was that all about?
It started with this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=
9f53d1e2.0411171738.786d84b5%40posting.google.com&prev=
/groups%3Fselm%3D9f53d1e2.0411171738.786d84b5%2540posting.google.com
I say in there:
"Recently but also in the past people having been attempting to expose
some identity. Gerry Armstrong was the first to make a move. He got no
where, and so he left ..."
Then we experienced some defense from Gerryoko. He did that in this
post:
http://groups.google.se/groups?q=g:thl2268142293d&dq=&hl=sv&lr
=&selm=ebmpp05uqh1ut35fetruip0a84nejf5f0l%404ax.com
A very long, and very confusing post (lots of copying and pasting),
and you know what, he does hardly respond to any issues at all.
I've tried to clean up some things in my response to that post:
http://groups.google.se/groups?q=g:thl2268142293d&dq=&hl=
sv&lr=&selm=9f53d1e2.0411191756.446628dc%40posting.google.com
And Gerryono marvelously runs again.....
I only want to reiterate the following from that:
[start quote]
> >You wrote:
> >"But most importantly, please provide your own personal experience.
> >What posts have you been on during what years? What do you know
about
> >the "Suppressive Person" doctrine?"
> >
> >I responded:
> >"I don't think it will suit any purpose to tell about that
without
> >directly relating it to matters discussed. Anyhow I have been involved
> >with many missions (longterm establishment projects actually),
have
> >been posted in CMO and various HCO's (Flag & LA). I do not
intend to
> >disclose personal details, I prefer to keep my anonimity for personal
> >reasons."
> >(somewhere on this page:
> >http://groups.google.se/groups?hl=sv&lr=&selm=9f53d1e2.0407131802.7
75cab17%40posting.google.com&rnum=4)
> >
> >So what does: "What posts have you been on during what years?"
> >actually mean?
>
> In this context, it was a logical question in the "communication"
or
> "conversation" that *you* claimed you wanted.
I agree, it could be, that's an option.
But further on in the very same post you write:
"Please identify all your posts in the cult, when and where you held
each, and what training and processing you did when and where."
Well Gerry?
[end quote]
I am still waiting for your reaction, dear old boy....