"You see, take
a gun (they are all over the place), put a bullet in there (also easy).
Now locate the whereabouts of Gerry (requires some doingness), then go to
him (take a plane, that's fastest), wait for him (at some place), pull your
gun (does not require much musclepower), then aim (some will have problems
with this), and finally pull the trigger..(keep your hand steady or you'll
miss altogether). Easy no?"
Gerry Armstrong <g...@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in message news:<2sntp0dm0hmcgonman7vl6fq8035vkq7gj@4ax.com>...
> On 19 Nov 2004 16:54:19 -0800, spacetraveler2...@hotmail.com
> (Spacetraveler) wrote:
>
> >Mike O'Connor <m...@leptonicsystems.com> wrote in message
news:<mike-D4DA91.11535018112004@news4-ge1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> >> In article <9f53d1e2.0411180335.9f56...@posting.google.com>,
> >> spacetraveler2...@hotmail.com (Spacetraveler) wrote:
> >>
> >> > So what does:
> [...]
> >> > actually mean?
>
> >> > no reason to run
> [...]
> >> > YOu run from
>
> >> > Gerry exposed:
> >>
> >> It's so obvious what you are. And when what you are is clear
the tactics
> >> you use don't work. Hubbard's tactics are without exception
meant to be
> >> used one on one,, or in tiny groups, or on one-way communication
lines.
> >> NOT in a place where tens of thousands of people are watching
and able
> >> to chime in at will. In such an environment they just don't
work.
> >>
> >> Even Mr. Hubbard would know and explain about that, if he
hadn't become
> >> so very, very utterly stone cold dead before this type of
communication
> >> appeared.
> >
> >Typical, I wronged you in some earlier thread and now you start
> >hitting on me. Yeah, typical... and bad manners...
>
> No, it's your *tactics*, Spacetrickster, it's your dishonesty, your
> refusal to respond to legitimate questions or challenges, your
> bottomless pretended stupidity, and your attacks on good people, all
> of whom, not coincidentally, are the Miscavige cult's fair game
> victims.
Claims, but no backup as usual. 'Good people'? Is that you? You can't
even answer questions...... Craw back under your rock!
>
> All Scientologists are practitioners of the "Suppressive Person"
> doctrine.
SP's speak only in generalities, see there!
> Therefore all Scientologists have bad manners.
And again. You are the living example that SP technology is ture and
factual. Life with that.
> If they had
> good manners they would themselves become fair game. Good manners
> toward SPs, even granting SPs credence, which is the first, most basic
> step of good manners, will make Scientologists SPs, and subject them
> to Scientologists' horribly bad manners.
You are a madman, you have more such nonsense to tell?
How come Gerry, you respond to 2 of my posts in this thread, but you
did not respond to the one about our latest discussion.
> >Thank you Gerry, I was expecting you!
>
> Isn't that just so OT. You lie about someone, you spread black PR,
and
> and then "expect" him. Whoop!
Has nothing to do with OT... it has to do with let's say prediction of
human behaviour.
> >You wrote:
> >"But most importantly, please provide your own personal experience.
> >What posts have you been on during what years? What do you know
about
> >the "Suppressive Person" doctrine?"
> >
> >I responded:
> >"I don't think it will suit any purpose to tell about that
without
> >directly relating it to matters discussed. Anyhow I have been involved
> >with many missions (longterm establishment projects actually),
have
> >been posted in CMO and various HCO's (Flag & LA). I do not
intend to
> >disclose personal details, I prefer to keep my anonimity for personal
> >reasons."
> >(somewhere on this page:
> >http://groups.google.se/groups?hl=sv&lr=&selm=9f53d1e2.
0407131802.775cab17%40posting.google.com&rnum=4)
> >
> >So what does: "What posts have you been on during what years?"
> >actually mean?
>
> In this context, it was a logical question in the "communication"
or
> "conversation" that *you* claimed you wanted.
I agree, it could be, that's an option. But further on in the very
same post you write:
"Please identify all your posts in the cult, when and where you held
each, and what training and processing you did when and where."