"You see, take
a gun (they are all over the place), put a bullet in there (also easy).
Now locate the whereabouts of Gerry (requires some doingness), then go to
him (take a plane, that's fastest), wait for him (at some place), pull your
gun (does not require much musclepower), then aim (some will have problems
with this), and finally pull the trigger..(keep your hand steady or you'll
miss altogether). Easy no?"
StilllovingMa...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message news:<bf456302.0411101809.212c2b28@posting.google.com>...
> "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net> wrote in message news:<419196b1$1@news2.lightlink.com>...
> > "Ball of Fluff" <Fluffy> wrote in message
> > news:41919211$1@news2.lightlink.com...
> > >
> > > "Spacetraveler" <spacetraveler2...@hotmail.com>
wrote in message
> > > news:9f53d1e2.0411091603.7d158c07@posting.google.com...
> > >> "Peregrine" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote
in message
> > >> news:<2vcabqF2jb8o4U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> > >>> "edo" <Anonymous-Remai...@See.Comment.Header.gmsociety.org>
wrote in
> > >>> message
> > >>> news:1NX6D61M38300.1747222222@anonymous.poster...
> > >>> > NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news
gateway.
> > >>> > No effort was made to verify the identity of
the sender.
> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 9 Nov 2004, spacetraveler2...@hotmail.com
(Spacetraveler) wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >>> If you're as intelligent as you think
you are, and in present time,
> > >>> >>> what's
> > >>> >>> your problem?
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>It's you who claim the above, not me. I respond
to concepts. I think
> > >>> >>I succeeded pretty well with that. And see,
you still keep on asking
> > >>> >>the same question all over again. Sect members
can't take in new
> > >>> >>information, they have to reiterate. I responded
to it, or it must be
> > >>> >>that you did not check the link I provided.
A sensible truly
> > >>> >>intelligent person also can figure out the
answer all by himself. Can
> > >>> >>you? Seems not.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>Why asking questions if you don't want to
learn?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > More mumbo jumbo.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Why not just answer the question?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Here's some space for you, Spacetraveller. Maybe
it'll help you.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > ==========
> > >>> > The reason L Ron Hubbard never did anything
effective to stop the
> > >>> > Church
> > >>> > of
> > >>> > Scientology's practice of fair game in my (Spacetravller's)
opinion,
> > >>> > is
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> > ==========
> > >>> >
> > >>> > edo
> > >>> > -=-
> > >>>
> > >>> There you go, edo :)
> > >>>
> > >>> Spacetraveller obviously has some issues with having
(and/or) stating
> > >>> his/her/own opinion, so I've fixed your post to help
him/her out a bit.
> > >>
> > >> I am not really in the business of giving opinions, opinions
will not
> > >> help you. Use your senses and study the history of the
phenomena
> > >> during the years.
> > >>
> > >> There are several sites giving information about this,
the most
> > >> suitable I found to be this one: http://fair-game-law.notlong.com
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> I will fall off my chair in amazement if we actually
get a response *to
> > >>> the
> > >>> question* though.
> > >>
> > >> Off course you will, as all the data is already given,
and you haven't
> > >> fallen yet. Or did you? I guess you can say that you
didn't when in
> > >> fact you did, hmmm.
> > >>
> > >
> > > This is a discussion group. Not a patter drill.
> > >
> > > Try to remember that.
> > >
> > > C
> >
> > This guy sounds SO much like Bill Yaude, and no, I'm not saying
it is...just
> > that he has the same way of posting. Bill would rarely give an
opinion, and
> > always new more than others, and was great at quoting references.
>
> And he is a great cook, remember? This on top of his pleasant
> personality, that makes him a great catch!
Hmm, I'm not ready for marriage yet.
> >
> > Well, Spacetraveler, I guess you'll just have to pony up and answer
the
> > damned question. That's part of the Comm cycle, you know......
:)
> >
> > Tory/Magoo~~
> > >
> > >
>
> Tory, when I came to this newsgroup, I tried to acknowledge any
> posting, till I found out that you may post yourself into complete
> exhaustion if you ack them all. :)
I think not that one has to ack all communications, it is rather to
follow to relevant discussions. We know that dear Tory does not do
that if she is uncomfortable with these particular discussions. With
this she is following in the footsteps of our old friend Gerry
Armstrong. He also backed out of it.
It's funny, all these things people tell me about you. Well, in my
opinion you come with good thought-out arguments. Meaning one can
learn something from you. Keep on going!