"You see, take
a gun (they are all over the place), put a bullet in there (also easy).
Now locate the whereabouts of Gerry (requires some doingness), then go to
him (take a plane, that's fastest), wait for him (at some place), pull your
gun (does not require much musclepower), then aim (some will have problems
with this), and finally pull the trigger..(keep your hand steady or you'll
miss altogether). Easy no?"
— Spacetraveler
February 8, 2005
From: spacetraveler2...@hotmail.com (Spacetraveler)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Fair game again....conveniencies and leaving
out data....Armstrong, Rice & Heldal-Lund Date: 3 Nov 2004 18:27:38 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <9f53d1e2.0411031827.23b112fe@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.209.42.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1099535259 12203 127.0.0.1 (4 Nov 2004 02:27:39
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 02:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
It appears that attackers of Scientology continue to be dishonest
about some things. It seems popular to just leave out some data when
it is found convenient to back up some claim made, how incredibility
convenient!
Now, what is being left out?
They say that "HCO PL 18 Oct 67 Issue IV "Penalties for Lower
Conditions"" was only cancelled for the use of the name 'fair
game'.
And that L. Ron Hubbard meant it to be that fair game in reality never
was cancelled.
this then would be: "HCO PL 21 Oct 68 "Cancellation of Fair Game""
And that is simply not true!
The issue they very conveniently leave out is:
"HCO PL 21 July 68 "Penalties for Lower Conditions"",
which is
predating the reference that they are quoting.
HCO PL 21 July 68 cancelled the 1967 issue that they are upholding
this very day as being in use!!!! My God, it was cancelled already 36
YEARS AGO!!!!
You'll find the whole story on following links:
http://fair-game-law.notlong.com &
http://hcopl-cancellation-fair-game.notlong.com
Gerry Armstrong makes the claim:
"But Hubbard was just fair gaming his "enemies" with his
"cancellation," just playing a trick on them. He "cancelled"
the use
of the term "fair game" when declaring people "enemies"
or "SPs," with
the cynical excuse that it caused bad PR, but he ordered that the same
"treatment" of those "enemies" continue as before. The
Scientologists
in the Hubbard regime knew that the same violent, antisocial and
criminal actions were to be taken against these "enemies," the
"SPs."
Fair game would continue, but it would not be called by that name."
The ever 'honest' Fredric Rice says something similar.
Andreas Heldal-Lund however does not make this claim, and he seems
only to have been misled.
Do you see!
Would they acknowledge the existence of: "HCO PL 21 July 68 "Penalties
for Lower Conditions"", then they will lose an argument. "No!",
say
Armstrong and Rice, "it is better to simply ignore this issue, and
we
then simply will mislead our readers!"
Previously I have had various discussions about this on the ARS, and
both Gerry Armstrong and Fredric Rice were approached at many
occasions. Well, their websites are still not quoting this reference.
And they are still telling the same dishonest claims (not to say
'lies').
And don't forget: "Gerry Armstrong is the expert on 'fair game'."
Yeah, let us not forget that! He wrote that to me at various
locations!
I haven't had contact with Andreas Heldal-Lund about this, however he
must have seen the discussions about this matter. I would strongly
urge him to adjust his webpage.