From: Zinj <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: kids
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:48:57 -0700
References: <email@example.com> <AXFZUN9237913.firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.60
X-Trace: 20 Oct 2003 00:45:33 -0400, 220.127.116.11
X-Original-Trace: 20 Oct 2003 00:45:33 -0400, 18.104.22.168
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1650633
In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
> I realize that. Gerry realizes that. Gerry denies making
the forged post.
We know Gerry denies making the probably ptsc forged 'Gerry'
Does Gerry deny making the *original* 'forged' (or not) post
that started this whole silliness?
Obviously Gerry was ready to jump on it, as a 'pederast
scientologist' post, but, did he forge it himself? Has he taken
Scientology® - Deliberately killing no more than 0.5 percent of
its members since 1953