From: Zinj <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: kids
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:06:56 -0700
References: <email@example.com> <5XMLB54D37911.9194444444@Gilgamesh-frog.org>
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.60
X-Trace: 20 Oct 2003 01:03:31 -0400, 126.96.36.199
X-Original-Trace: 20 Oct 2003 01:03:31 -0400, 188.8.131.52
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1650638
In article <MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> In article <email@example.com>,
> firstname.lastname@example.org says...
> > Look, moron,
> You haven't admitted or denied that you yourself were the author
> of the Gerry Armstrong forgery.
Come on Petey, anyone would understand if you just giggled and
said 'Yeah, I did it :) I thought the arrogance involved in
forging an obviously self-indicting bit of effluvia was worthy
of a reply in kind.
I thought that Gerry's attempt to be 'clever' deserved a
the tail. Goof for the gander etc.
He wanted to show how clever he could be in 'inventing' issues,
I thought it would be worthwhile to turn the tables on him.
So, I faked a post by him. Not a big issue. I post using
anonymous remailers often, and often for much less benign
This was just a little jolly
Scientology® - Deliberately killing no more than 0.5 percent of
its members since 1953