In article <18YRONF938329.4994328704@anonymous.poster>, Unbiased Observer
says...
>
>NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
>No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>What criticism of you is "attacks on Scientology's fair game victims"?
>Please give some examples.
>
>What criticism of you "only serves OSA's malevolent purposes toward
>Scientology's fair game victims"? Please give some examples.
>
>What criticism of you wouldn't be "attacks on Scientology's fair game
>victims" or "only serves OSA's malevolent purposes toward Scientology's
>fair game victims"? Please give some examples.
>
>Thanks, Gerry.
>
>Unbiased Observer

Here is a snip of something Gerry said on this NG a while back. I don't think
it holds true any more. Will this man ever speak plainly, simply and calmly the
truth? Susan S

5. I am willing to carry on a discussion of Scientology matters with anyone in
this newsgroup who wishes to conduct a calm, polite, critical debate. I don't
have any problem with people disagreeing with what I have to say [actually, I
expect most of you to disagree with *most* of what I have to say]; but, please
stick to calm, rational arguments in response - childish name-calling, vicious
slurs, loud tirades, wild rantings, and the
like will simply be ignored and cause me to cease responding to the offender.