Path: pd7tw1no!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!news.alt.net!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!129.250.175.17!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From: Susan s <Susan_member@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: 3 questions for Gerry Armstrong
Date: 11 Dec 2004 12:15:09 -0800
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com]
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <cpfkgd01qq9@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <18YRONF938329.4994328704@anonymous.poster> <66K5H45M38332.0223958333@anonymous.poster>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-842.newsdawg.com
X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 4.20
Xref: pd7hu0no alt.religion.scientology:114722
X-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:35:20 MST (pd7tw1no)
In article <66K5H45M38332.0223958333@anonymous.poster>, Unbiased Observer
says...
>
>On 8 Dec 2004, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header.gmsociety.org
>(Unbiased Observer) wrote:
>
>>What criticism of you is "attacks on Scientology's fair game victims"?
>>Please give some examples.
>>
>>What criticism of you "only serves OSA's malevolent purposes toward
>>Scientology's fair game victims"? Please give some examples.
>>
>>What criticism of you wouldn't be "attacks on Scientology's fair
game
>>victims" or "only serves OSA's malevolent purposes toward Scientology's
>>fair game victims"? Please give some examples.
>>
>>Thanks, Gerry.
>>
>>Unbiased Observer
>
>I realize it's only been two days, but should I expect answers?
>
>Unbiased Observer
Not if you are hoping to get truthful answers.
Susan S
|