I am really honestly trying to understand the controversy; Scn good or bad?. I
have been studying many of the web sites that are suggested on this NG. I am
sorry to say that I can find numerous conflicts that make the antis
non-credible. Some conflicts are so incredible that I must speak out. Recently
I studied all about Gerry Armstrong accusing Scn of not being a religion. Then,
I read the recent appeal or some sort of court case with Scn in California, and
he states Scn is a religion. This just doesn't make sense to me. That is quite
a turn about in my opinion. He seemed so vehement about it not being a religion
for so many years... well, it is just too much to believe. I cannot help but
determine he is manufacturing everything he states. What else can someone
conclude? He is just saying it is a religion because it helps his case? Not
that I can even understand how that might be, but whatever. It just doesn't add
up. Susan S