Path: pd7tw1no!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!news.alt.net!news.glorb.com!pln-w!spln!lex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!drn
From: Susan <Susan_member@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology,alt.support.ex-cult
Subject: Re: Does Rick Ross Deserve His Own Newsgroup?
Date: 9 Dec 2004 19:07:19 -0800
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com]
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <cpb3t70voh@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <black_ice-E0A87E.18112403122004@individual.net> <6o62r09otem1m290man9tic2i1vdrvdbd1@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-119.newsdawg.com
X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 4.20
Xref: pd7hu0no alt.religion.scientology:114096 alt.clearing.technology:30176876
alt.support.ex-cult:30023366
X-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:25:14 MST (pd7tw1no)
If someone like you Gerry Armstrong, who spreads incredible lies via the
internet, can have his own web site, way not yet another, maybe even worse,
spreader of falsehoods have his own site or discussion group? It's chaos out
here on this information highway. Susan
In article <6o62r09otem1m290man9tic2i1vdrvdbd1@4ax.com>, Gerry Armstrong
says...
>
>On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:11:24 -0500, black_ice@mac.com wrote:
>
>>
>>Does Rick Ross deserve his own newsgroup?
>
>Hi Rick:
>
>I'd say absolutely, but it's really up to you.
>
>It's pretty good PR. I think there's almost enough traffic on a.r.s.,
>where I usually post (but also now umpteen other newsgroups are being
>x-posted to) that I should ask myself the same question: Does Gerry
>Armstrong deserve his own newsgroup?
>
>Good idea, Rick. Thanks.
>
>>
>>I'm proposing the creation of alt.fan.rick-ross over at alt.config.
>>
>>Mr. Ross has a MODERATED forum over at his site
>>
>> http://forum.rickross.com/
>>
>>but it has been reported here at alt.fan.landmark that he removes or
>>censors posts that speak in a positive light regarding this specific
>>LGAT (est Training or Landmark Education Corporation).
>
>Oh, heck yes. We'd love someone over on a.r.s who can speak in a
>positive light (not sure of that metaphor) regarding Scientology. Just
>by their speaking "tech" every Scientologist puts Scientology in
a
>negative light. We have a load of Scientologists here and none of them
>put Scientology in a positive light. But if they'd pitch up on
>alt.enemy.gerry-armstrong and put Scientology in a good light, I'd
>say, yes, start that newsgroup.
>
>>
>>Shouldn't there be an UNMODERATED newsgroup so that Mr. Ross' operation
>>may be discussed openly and freely?
>
>Sure, Rick. And come to think of it there SHOULD BE AN UNMODERATED NG
>to discuss the Gerry Armstrong Operation openly and freely.
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/index.html
>
>Great idea.
>
>>
>>If you'd like to comment pro or con, jump on over to alt.config and look
>>for the Header: Proposal newgroup alt.fan.rick-ross
>
>You bet, Rick. I'll promote alt.fan.rick-ross for you and you promote
>alt.enemy.gerry-armstrong for me.
>
>>
>>If cults like est, Landmark and the CO$ can have their own newsgroup,
>>why not a newsgroup for the anti-cult superhero, Rick Ross?
>
>Absolutely, Rick. What a time saver. I wouldn't promote myself as an
>anticult superhero, but that's just a matter of style. But the
>newsgroup idea is a winner.
>
>© Gerry Armstrong
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
|