From: Starshadow <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: CLairification of Fraud
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:44:00 -0800
Organization: Lightlink Internet
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Original-Trace: 2 Dec 2002 19:44:05 -0500, 18.104.22.168
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, ptsc says...
>>That you're calling Starshadow OSA is as kooky as Koos auditing
> Can you cite a message ID for a post in which called Starshadow OSA?
> I've never seen any post by Caroline calling Starshadow OSA.
You mean that you need
her using the word "OSA", Warrior? (Well, to be
pedantic, the acronym, not the word)
In any case stating that
my "authentication of Claire as a declared SP"
being like "Dave Kluge authenticating Mike Rinder as a reformer" is
the very least an accusation that I'm lying, and that my lies are
somehow akin to the lie of Rinder being a reformer, and she goes on to
say that my post to her was "hateful" SIMPLY AND SOLELY because I
disagreed with her, not because of any actual "hate" in that post, which
in any case is EXACTLY like the cult representatives screaming about
hate when all one does is disagree with them.
Armstrong has also in the
past as much as accused me of running some
kind of Scn'y ops on him by disagreeing with him, as well.
If you don't think that
insinuating that I'm somehow in the same league
as Rinder and Co. isn't an accusation of being OSA, that seems to me to
be a personal problem. I think it's quite clear (no pun intended) her
intent especially since she's featured my posts on her DA page.
Starshadow, KoX, SP5, Official
Wiccan Chaplain ARSCC(wdne)
"Scientology in 1986, after fraud judgement in favor
of ex-member Lawrence Wollersheim --'Not one thin dime for
Scientology May 9, 2002 before final appeal--
86,746,430 Thin Dimes for Wollersheim." www.factnet.org
www.xenu.net --what the Church of Scientology doesn't want
you to see