Subject: Re: Armstrong Displays His Delusional Mental State to
the World (Re: Diane cancans at the goOn SquAd follies)
Date: 19 Nov 2002 12:25:56 -0800
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1037737556 29114 127.0.0.1 (19 Nov 2002 20:25:56 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Nov 2002 20:25:56 GMT
Gerry Armstrong <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:<email@example.com>...
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2002
21:32:23 GMT, Deana Holmes <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >Thomas Gandow <email@example.com> wrote in
> >> What is Your business?
> >> Why are You attacking Gerry Armstrong?
> >> Isn't it the best proof, that You are attacking in concert with
> >No, Reverend Grabdough. It shows that Gerry Armstrong has never left
> >Scientology, with his reliance on Dead Agenting techniques first engaged
> >by the Office of Special Affairs.
> Oh how stupid the pretended stupid must pretend to be! Sun Tzu was
> teaching the Dead Agent "tech" 2400 years before OSA.
> And what exactly am I doing? I am webbing your own statements made to
> this public newsgroup, without comment, without interpretation. I am
> quoting you precisely. I am including a link to every thread so that
> the complete context is available.
> Therefore it is you who, by your pretended stupidity and by your
> baseless attacks on the Scientology cult's fair game victims, is DAing
> You say that doing what I am doing shows I never left Scientology. You
> have to to pretend to be stupid beyond belief to believe anyone, even
> one of your fellow goons, would believe that. I would love if the
> Scientology cultists webbed all my a.r.s. posts on such a nice page
> and linked to the complete thread where they appeared.
> You are quite free to build your own web page of my posts to a.r.s.
> about you, or about anything.
> You are also quite free to continue your attacks on Scientology's fair
> game victims from your position of pretended stupidity. And I am quite
> free to point out that this is what you're doing. You are then quite
> free, as you've demonstrated, to pretend to be even stupider and label
> my pointing out the truth about your attacks as "dead agenting."
> Unless you really are a knowing OSA operative, you are also quite free
> to repent, to stop forwarding OSA's command intention, to stop your
> baseless, vicious attacks on good people who are Scientology's fair
> game victims.
> © Gerry Armstrong
Speaking of Dead-Agenting
From: Beverly Rice (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Subject: Re: THE REAL GERRY ARMSTRONG (repost)
View: Complete Thread (24 articles)
Date: 2002-11-18 20:14:23 PST
Gerry Armstrong wrote:
> Just to set the record straight about what follows, Beverly Rice
> completely misinterpreted something I wrote back in April this year,
> took it in a personal way that was unrelated to the way it was
> intended, made a connection which didn't exist, and used it as a
> certainty from which to attack me.
No I didn't, you are a
liar, as much as you will try to spin it, I
am very well aware of your covertness . . .
I know why you were picked as being Intel Ops in Co$ for Hubbard,
you are very clever, just as Co$ is very clever until they are
Your added, unnecessary remark at the end of a post to me in a
thread you made about yourself ~was~ directed as a stab intended
to hurt deep.
You can play ignorant for others.
The fact is that over the two and a half years our "friendship"
spanned shortly after my husbands suicide, when I was still
really messed up and incredibly vulnerable . . .
I shared with you in absolute detail my inner most thoughts,
and the details of my therapy, among many other most personal
aspects of my life, because, as you said . . .
you cared, and we had a special relationship.
One of the things I shared with you, ~explicitly~ . . .
was how everyday statements that are made quite commonly,
such as "I need that like a hole in the head", or "putting a
gun to his/her head", or "just shoot me", or ~anything~ that
had to do with shooting heads, would totally cave me in.
That was explicitly stated to you, and talked about severally.
Your added, unnecessary remark at the end of a post to me when
I was calling you out about making the CST issue about you:
"Oh, and don't go
shooting at the heads of the people trying to do what
you think is this most important thing to do."
was a deliberate jab, and was intentional, and you can't play
ignorant, and I won't let you because we both know better.
I know what you pretend to be now, but I also know that you
are still Intel in your heart.
And while we are on that subject, let me tell you another
HubTOADian/Co$ action that you took that has been decried
by many others regarding Co$ tactics as being one of the
worst . . .
and this is the one that I am most disgusted at where you
You were upset when you saw I had saved a few of the e-mails
you sent me, I normally do not keep e-mails after I receive
them, but destroy them, but these were just a couple of
ones that were little jokes between us or a little mushy . . .
but you asked me to delete them, you know, "just in case I
get raided" by the Co$, they won't be in my computer, so I
did . . .
it's called "respect for another human being".
But then, in one of our last conversations . . .
you made a call to me, and out of the blue you tell me that
you have kept every communication and everything I have ever
sent to you over that long period of time of trust and of
confidence . . .
things that Co$ would love to have on me, and things that
would be absolutely devastating to my life . . .
and informed me that you had turned them into a "collection"
In other words, you did not give me the same consideration
and respect that you demanded for your own self . . .
but then again the truth of the matter is no matter what you
pretend to be now, you ~are~ Intel at heart . . .
and it's a good thing to have complete write-ups of the most
intimate portions of a persons life for your files, isn't it?
You know, something gained along the lines of some words that
were posted on ARS not too long ago that went:
of a person's records fraudulently obtained
by the creation of a relationship of "trust" is an excellent issue."
Maybe you feel that only refers to Co$, and not to you when
you do the exact same action.
Except I know better than
to ask for my "records" back.
As a matter of fact, I don't even want them back, but would like
the same courtesy from you that you received from me, just destroy
and delete them from existance.
But I know better, I know you won't, because I know you ~can't~ . . .
and I know that you ~don't~ give others the same respect you
receive for yourself, unless they toe the line with you without
For that one action alone, of turning me in to a "collection" that
you keep of my most personal life and my deepest thoughts and
emotions, and the most tragic and secret things of my life . . .
i call you scum.
And you ~are~ a liar. Try to spin this any other way you wish . . .
you are ~NOT~ a "Man of God" . . .
you're not even a man . . .
you've always had to depend on finding a strong woman to be your
"left nut" for you.
You are a fraud, and you are every bit as much a con man as
Hubbard was . . .
just with a much smaller following . . .
Yeh, I know, you are working on that.
ARC = As-Ising the Real