§ Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact §

   

    

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=f6058cf6.0211152306.41c6fd63%40posting.google.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain

From: ffracs@hotmail.com (Garry)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: THE REAL GERRY ARMSTRONG (repost)
Date: 15 Nov 2002 23:06:41 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <f6058cf6.0211152306.41c6fd63@posting.google.com>
References: <ht2atu0pu2qoahsnkna252jia5ceu5m6of@4ax.com> <TS8GQREN37575.4181018519@anonymous.poster> <hqbatukl1a4pv2ajvhu7hog9a2m36mj5ng@4ax.com> <jubB9.11415$__1.3350@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.138.118.146
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1037430401 25122 127.0.0.1 (16 Nov 2002 07:06:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Nov 2002 07:06:41 GMT


"Gandalf" <BasicQuestions@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<jubB9.11415$__1.3350@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>...

> "Gerry Armstrong" <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in message
> news:hqbatukl1a4pv2ajvhu7hog9a2m36mj5ng@4ax.com...
> > On 15 Nov 2002 16:02:04 -0000, Pookiebelle <pookie@belle.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Gerry's really kooking out now. You've proved your point. Now please
> > >stop or else you will look just as kooky as him.
>
> I thank you for your sage advice. Nonetheless, I'd already stuck my foot too
> far up my mouth to dislodge it other than by carrying through.
>
> Gerry,
>
> Each of the following post analyses have a subjective AG Score: "About Gerry
> Score" which is 0 or 1. Zero if the post was not primarily about Gerry, 1 if
> it was.
>
> In summary, my analysis showed that I was wrong in claiming that Gerry
> primarily posts about Gerry. A few posts are Gerry about Gerry, but far
> fewer than I had originally thought or claimed. I went back enough posts to
> conclude that the evidence was overwhelmingly against me and further
> analysis would just be tedious repetition.
>
> While I very much dislike being wrong, this is a nice conclusion in a way: I
> 'd prefer being wrong about another critic's limitations than right.
>
> Therefore, I formally apologize to you Gerry and retract my prior negative
> statements about "you almost always posting about yourself." It was my
> mistake and I stand corrected.
>
> Sincerely sorry [and, with a little luck, I'll be right next time :)],
> Gandalf

And don't you forget it, Gandalf...because I guarantee you that Gerry
never will...and will jump to the occasion to use your apology as a
weapon against you next time you cross hairs with the kook.


 

Thread

 

§ Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact §