Subject: Re: Question for Gerry Armstrong
Date: 15 Nov 2002 23:25:06 -0800
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1037431506 26475 127.0.0.1 (16 Nov 2002 07:25:06 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Nov 2002 07:25:06 GMT
firstname.lastname@example.org (Diane Richardson) wrote in message news:<email@example.com>...
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:59:13 +0100, Gerry Armstrong
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:01:11 GMT, email@example.com (Diane Richardson)
> >>On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:07:21 +0100, Gerry Armstrong
> >><firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >>Will you be answering questions about the part you played in
> >>assisting Robert S. Minton, Jr. (or, if you prefer, "The Minton
> >>in money laundering?
> >It all depends.
> Depends on what? Your current delusional state?
> >And I say that without in any way accepting your term "money
> >laundering," since I received a legal opinion, on which I depended,
> >that there was no "money laundering."
> Acceping legal advice from Arnie Lerma is neither wise nor prudent.
> >And now that I've answered your question, I have one for you.
> Ah, but you haven't answered my question. It's lies like that which
> trip you up every time.
In GerryKook's mindset,
unless his royal flatulence deems your
question legitimate, then it is not a question.