|
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=01bcf436%247e21ffe0%24eb4f1ecf%40scaarf&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
From: "Garry Scarff"
<Scarff@iag.net>
Subject: Re: Naked Is As Naked Does (Was Seemingly Naked)
Date: 1997/11/19
Message-ID: <01bcf436$7e21ffe0$eb4f1ecf@scaarf>#1/1
References: <34712127.470881252@news.dowco.com>
Organization: ARSholes Anonymous
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
gerry armstrong <armstrong@ntonline.com>
wrote in article
<34712127.470881252@news.dowco.com>...
>
> >On 27 Oct 1997 tilman@berlin.snafu.de (Tilman Hausherr) wrote:> >
> >
> >I asked Gerry Armstrong if he did appear "seemingly naked"
in a
> >newspaper, as clam publications said. He explained that this DA shows
> >very well how DA works. He had founded a movement called the
> >"renunciators" and had sent press releases about this to the
media.
> > The Marin county newspaper interviewed him and made a foto of him
> >in the lotus position behind a huge globe. Because the globe was so
> > big, most of his body couldn't be seen - he was wearing Gym shorts,
> > he wasn't naked at all. Eugene Ingram (who, btw, once told Gerry that
> >he would get a bullet between his eyes) even visited the paper and
> >interviewed the journalist / fotographers, so scientology knew very well
> > that Gerry wasn't naked.> >
> >
> >Tilman
Damn, I always wanted to
know what Gerry looked like naked? Whether it''s
true that he has a small tatoo of a bee on the stem of his dick?
|