From: ptsc <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Calling Gerry Armstrong
Organization: Busts Your Rips!
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:50:03 GMT
X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1045777803 18.104.22.168 (Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:50:03
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:50:03 EST
On 20 Feb 2003 13:05:31 -0800, Warrior <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>In article <email@example.com>, ptsc says...
>And if Gerry is not near his computer and thus unable to read his
>email, it would be pretty normal behavior to not be able to respond,
>but leave it to ptsc to post in his usual -- attack attack attack,
>call names and sling some insults -- manner.
You mean like falsely accusing people of being OSA? How the fuck
SHOULD I respond to that shit? By kissing that fucker's ass? FUCK
Gerry Armstrong and his shit-for-brains OSA site, and FUCK YOU.
Guess what, people don't LIKE IT when you lie about them. Is that
really very fucking difficult to understand?