§  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §

   

    

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=95ja5v40m55kptv7pfb7akspa9uth4eqjk%404ax.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain

From: ptsc <ptsc@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Calling Gerry Armstrong
Organization: Busts Your Rips!
Message-ID: <95ja5v40m55kptv7pfb7akspa9uth4eqjk@4ax.com>
References: <b3148u02pnk@enews2.newsguy.com> <575016bf.0302192130.7d16b24a@posting.google.com> <b33a5602t39@enews3.newsguy.com> <mkca5vgs5vsq9bod6rhau8r1ponstrbrvr@4ax.com> <b33fur012pt@drn.newsguy.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 14
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:50:03 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.33.64.22
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1045777803 4.33.64.22 (Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:50:03 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:50:03 EST


On 20 Feb 2003 13:05:31 -0800, Warrior <warrior@xenu.ca> wrote:

>In article <mkca5vgs5vsq9bod6rhau8r1ponstrbrvr@4ax.com>, ptsc says...

>And if Gerry is not near his computer and thus unable to read his
>email, it would be pretty normal behavior to not be able to respond,
>but leave it to ptsc to post in his usual -- attack attack attack,
>call names and sling some insults -- manner.

You mean like falsely accusing people of being OSA? How the fuck
SHOULD I respond to that shit? By kissing that fucker's ass? FUCK
Gerry Armstrong and his shit-for-brains OSA site, and FUCK YOU.
Guess what, people don't LIKE IT when you lie about them. Is that
really very fucking difficult to understand?

 

 

Thread

 

§  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §