NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:41:27 -0500
From: "OT III" <E-Lawrence@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Scientology Collaborator -- Duplicitous or
Just a Dupe?
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:41:05 -0400
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
cjtgY0YEnXUXWtKMnx8hozWHHfsIIpiFdJ6oan4Nss2LT X-Complaints-To: email@example.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
"Gerry Armstrong" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
wrote in message
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:17:49 -0400, "OT III" <E-Lawrence@comcast.net>
>"Gerry Armstrong" wrote in message:
>Dear Gerry Armstrong:
>The above PDF created with Adobe Photoshop
Flunk. It was created with Adobe Acrobat.
Font? Flunk. It's a scan of a fax, probably of a photocopy.
> even at less than 80% magnification.
>Don't tell me to get glasses!
Well actually you might need something to wear the glasses.
>The fonts are blurry and fuzzy
>and at low resolutions they look all clumped together.
Isn't that amazing. How do the fonts look over here?
How's your clump?
>I can afford to tell you that because someone in my family
>is a semi-Professional in using Adobe Products and two
>opinions is better than one. (SMILE)
As your semi-pro family member how's the clumping in this
really was made in Photoshop?
Dear Gerry Armstrong:
It was not and/or you do not know what
you are doing.
My Adobe Acrobat says your PDF was created with
Photoshop elements enabling .jpg extra functionality.
My software is up to date, you can bet on it!
So skip town on software over here.
It looks like that because you scanned
it not because you
CREATED it. It is terrible. It looks like an amateur did
it, which is what you are basically if this is as far as you got
since blowing the Sea Org and god knows who else.