http://www.google.com/groups?selm=e2v1b.2716%24qa.80680%40news1.calgary.shaw.ca&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.86.229.220
From: "Nelson" <nelsonh@shaw.ca>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology,de.soc.weltanschauung.scientology
References: <7msnjvobcgfju8287d0tup77gdnmpackle@4ax.com> <7a7akvo2m617jolbaubu700ndh49rmfo1n@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Ron Surprisingly Unbumptious at New Years
Party 1980
Lines: 182
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300
Message-ID: <e2v1b.2716$qa.80680@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:28:58 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.70.95.207
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
X-Trace: news1.calgary.shaw.ca 1061584138 24.70.95.207 (Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:28:58
MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:28:58 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
Gerry, me thinks your thetan is gone and you cant get it back. Or in other
words, you are not in your own valence so cant as is anything and your
continual present time overt acts just keep growing and growing.
Nelson
"Gerry Armstrong" <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in message
news:7a7akvo2m617jolbaubu700ndh49rmfo1n@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:48:17 +0200, Gerry Armstrong
> <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote:
>
> >(Just before 1400 DMT!)
> >
> >Webbed on the What's New Page: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/new.html
> >
>
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/historical/new-years-1980-he
met.html
> >
> >This photo was taken during the 1980 New Years Day meal at "X,"
> >Hubbard's hideout at that time in Hemet, California. Kima Douglas is
> >at the far left of the photo. The person Hubbard appears to be
> >communicating with could be Michael Douglas. The woman to the right of
> >that person at the table looks like Terri Gamboa. The man to her right
> >is Asian, and I've forgotten his name. The only person on the other
> >side of the table that I can positively identify is David Mayo, with
> >the leather jacket and smoking the Sherman (oops). They're drinking
> >Lancers Rose, a cheap and available wine Hubbard must have had on many
> >occasions during the Apollo's years in Portugal.
> >
> >Note that Hubbard here has quite clearly lost his phrenologist's
> >fruit, the epicranial protuberance he sported in the 70's, and which
> >is quite visible in these photos from December 1974.
>
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/historical/apollo-wedding5.h
tml
>
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/historical/apollo-wedding24.
html
>
>http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/historical/apollo-wedding26.
html
> >
> >Jim Dincalci mentioned the bump in his interview with Russell Miller
> >published in Bare-faced Messiah.
> >
> >[Quote]
> >
> >After dinner Hubbard had a single tot of brandy and sometimes talked
> >into the night. 'He'd jump around from subject to subject,' said
> >Dincalci. 'One minute he'd be talking about how an angel had given him
> >this sector of the universe to look after and next minute he'd be
> >talking about the camera he wanted me to buy for him next day. I used
> >to watch him talking; sometimes his eyes would roll up into his head
> >for a couple of minutes and he'd be kinda gone. One of the things that
> >upset him was that he'd never gotten back the money that he had
> >stashed away in previous lives. There was some inside the statue of a
> >horse in Italy which he had hidden in the sixteenth century. He was a
> >writer and had written The Prince. "That son-of-a-bitch Machiavelli
> >stole it from me," he said. He talked a lot about his childhood
and
> >all the horses he had ridden when he was little, how he would get on
> >them before he could walk. I didn't get the impression that it was a
> >happy childhood, not at all. There was a lot of bitterness there about
> >his parents. He said, over and over, he had graduated from George
> >Washington University. "They say I didn't," he used to complain,
"but
> >I did." He said that he was editor of the University paper for four
> >years and that would prove it.
> >
> >'He said that when Pearl Harbor was bombed he was on some island in
> >the Pacific and he was the senior person in charge because everyone
> >else had been killed. He was controlling all the traffic through the
> >island until a bomb exploded right by him at the airport and he was
> >sent home, the first US casualty of World War Two. He had a big fatty
> >tumour, a lymphoma, on the top of his head which he said had slivers
> >of shrapnel in it. We had it X-rayed once and had the film enlarged
> >fifty times to find the shrapnel, but there was nothing there. When he
> >came back from the war his first wife didn't go to see him, even
> >though he was wounded. He had nothing good to say about her. His
> >second wife, whom he never really married, was a spy who had been sent
> >by the Nazis to spy on him during the war.
> >
> >'Most nights I'd give him a massage before he went to bed and he
> >always said he felt better for it. In my mind I never questioned
> >anything he said except once when he was talking about out-of-the-body
> >experiences and how beautiful it was to sit on a cloud. I was always
> >running about New York looking at things for him and I thought if he
> >was such hot shit, why did I have to go and look? Why couldn't he go
> >out of his body and take a look himself?'
> >
> >[End Quote]
> >http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/CoS/BFM/bfm19.htm
> >
> >My recollection of the bump, which I saw on many occasions in the
> >70's, was that it was about 3 centimeters in diameter and a centimeter
> >in height. Scott Mayer says it was "golf-ball sized."
> >http://lisatrust.bogie.nl/scientology/essays/literati/99-Mayer.htm But
> >I would say that it was, in mass and shape, maybe a third of a golf
> >ball.
> >
> >Kima told me that Hubbard's bump was a sebaceous cyst, and that she
> >lanced it and squeezed out a tablespoon or so of fairly unfragrant
> >sebum. This would indicate that Jim Dincalci's statement, as reported
> >in Bare-Faced Messiah, that the bump was a "lymphoma," was
in error.
> >But, IANAD, and I wasn't there during the assistosection. The story
> >that when his head was lanced Hubbard took off and rocketed around the
> >room with the duty messengers frantically chasing after and trying to
> >grab hold of him is just so much hot air.
> >
> >A tech estimate I received stated that in the Commodore's
> >tablespoonful there would have been millions or even billions of body
> >thetans, including any number of clusters. On the fast side of
> >average, it takes a minute to blow a BT on NOTS. Splitting the
> >difference between a million and a billion BTs or clusters -- let's
> >say 550 million -- it would take something over 9 million well done
> >auditing hours. Even if Hubbard could have his sebaceous, or
> >lymphomatoid, BTs audited by the best (David Mayo was his auditor at
> >the time) who could put 20 hours in the chair every day, it would take
> >450 thousand days. If Hubbard was audited on NOTS every day of the
> >year as long as it took, since it does take as long as it takes, it
> >would take at least 1,232 years.
> >
> >Hubbard proved that the very highest OT on Teegeeac can't expect to
> >live 75 years, even if that OT postulated that he would live to be 200
> >years old.
> >http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/ars/ars-2000-03-11.html
> >Thus it would take over 16 lifetimes of unflagging NOTS auditing -- if
> >it was run from birth to death and 20 hours a day -- to rid even the
> >highest OT of a tablespoon of BTs and clusters. NOTS will never work.
> >It is obvious that the only thing that will work, if the planet is to
> >be cleared, is Lancers' Tech. What would take an auditor more than a
> >millennium, Kima did with a lance and a mere minute's squeezing.
> >Scientologists must stop auditing and learn to squeeze the BTs out of
> >their pcs. A lot less squeezing in the reg office, and a lot more
> >squeezing under the knife, and everyone can be rocketed to OT.
> >
> >I'm thinking of calling this the Technical Breakthrough of 2003.
> >
> >© 2003 Gerry Armstrong
> >
> >Please check over my arithmetic. You never know with all those zeros.
> >
> >Gerry
> >
> >© Gerry Armstrong
> >http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
>
> Someone who read my post mentioning Hubbard's bump referred me to this
> passage from NOTS #1:
>
> [Quote]
>
> Once in a while the guy gets a pain in the forehead. Let's say this
> somatic was "a pain in the forehead". He actually runs an incident
and
> there's a slight somatic in the forehead but it's kind of weird
> because it doesn't actually run out on his own forehead. It might
> disappear but it didn't disappear on his own forehead.
>
> [End Quote]
> NED FOR OTs RD - THEORY OF
> http://w4u.eexi.gr/~antbos/ned2.htm
>
> This might indicate that it wasn't really Ron's head that had the
> bump. It could also validate the idea that Ron really wasn't Ron at
> all, and that it was the head of now well known Ron impersonator Jack
> Marshall that had the bump.
> See
> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/ars/ars-2003-07-04-1.html
>
> This breakthrough piece of Tech by Ron, or Jack, also goes a long way
> in explaining what the camera caught at Scientology's New Years 2000
> event: http://www.lermanet.com/PhotoLIES.htm
>
> The man with no head was Ron.
>
> The two women in red and the other duplicate Scientologists were just
> unflat on NOTS. One set is not their own bodies. They're shell
> clusters in the shape of bodies that will become transparent after
> another thousand hours or so of auditing.
>
> © Gerry Armstrong
> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org