From: Keith <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Answer in $cientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <BDLA9.27024$1O2.3780@sccrnsc04>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net 1037294361 126.96.36.199 (Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:19:21
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:19:21 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:19:21 GMT
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:37:11 -0600, James Wood <email@example.com>
>I know when I'm effective
on ARS when
>"some" critics dead agent me!
Obviously you endorse
and embrace the practice of dead agenting along with
your pal Robert W. Clark. So what exactly is your beef with Scientology? Do
you want them to lower their rates so you can afford the training?
Any way back to the topic
on hand. What do you think of Gerry Armstrong
taking $800,000 and signing a gag agreement and then breaking it? I don't
think that is fair since he agreed to it and has now broken his agreement.