§ Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact §




From: Keith <nospam@nosssppam.no.sd>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Answer in $cientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
References: <kal6tus069gjiqdki7q2i0t14f78ltckhp@4ax.com> <BDLA9.27024$1O2.3780@sccrnsc04> <sKLA9.26982$QZ.6508@sccrnsc02> <wMMA9.57$Xo.205@rwcrnsc53> <md77tugdu6jlmph4o2uhnmrd0du9b3ks5a@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <YONA9.11993$Rp.5409@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1037281592 (Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:46:32 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:46:32 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:46:32 GMT

On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:20:31 +0100, Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>

>I have presented my arguments. Proof will come when the cult either
>cancels the "contract,"

That will never happen.

>or it is ruled unlawful in court,

That will never happen.

> or in some legislature,

Congress will pass the Armstrong Act preventing gag orders in 2040, NOT!

> or in the court of public opinion.

The court of public opinion doesn't make legal rulings.

> I have already had legal opinions from excellent authorities that such a "contract" is
>not legally enforceable in Germany.

You entered into the agreement years ago in California, so it still applies
to *you*.

This is the last rant of yours I will answer, it is like talking to a brick




§ Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact §