§  What's New  ||  Search   ||  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §

     
 
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Tom Padgett revisited
From: "kady@wwwaif.net" <kady@wwwaif.net>
References: <92f243a5fb292ff53c3a53828ca4b656@paranoici.org> <Xns942378A256874kadywwwaifnet@205.232.34.12> <vq11i5kvesjj21@corp.supernews.com> <Xns9423E642BE4F7kadywwwaifnet@205.232.34.12> <vq76vhoeha4494@corp.supernews.com> <Xns942661EB26434kadywwwaifnet@205.232.34.12> <vqbjvso6v7ecca@corp.supernews.com> <3FA65993.6050208@rochester.rr.com> <Xns942862355856Bkadywwwaifnet@205.232.34.12> <efish22-7CE0FB.07493103112003@aurora.lightlink.com>
Message-ID: <Xns9428732737A36kadywwwaifnet@205.232.34.12>
User-Agent: Xnews/05.08.12
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.230.25.162
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.230.25.162
Date: 3 Nov 2003 11:19:15 -0500
X-Trace: 3 Nov 2003 11:19:15 -0500, 64.230.25.162
X-Original-Trace: 3 Nov 2003 11:19:15 -0500, 64.230.25.162
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 42
Path: news2.lightlink.com
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1654500

efish22@hotmail.com wrote in
news:efish22-7CE0FB.07493103112003@aurora.lightlink.com:

> In article <Xns942862355856Bkadywwwaifnet@205.232.34.12>,
> "kady@wwwaif.net" <kady@wwwaif.net> wrote:
>
>> I mean, in a recent diatribe, Gerry Armstrong posted that violence
>> directed at Scientology by 'wogs' would be "entirely justified",
>> although he played a coy game of not *really* endorsing it himself,
>> wink wink, nudge nudge. Tom Klemesrud put forward the ludicrous
>> suggestion that Scientology operatives redefined the term "phat",
>> reinvigorating its use in the 'urban culture', solely to counter a mild
>> in-joke on the Internet that referred to Hubbard as "the Phattard".
>> Which is a conspiracy theory of a level of ridiculous that has been
>> properly lampooned in the past when the purveyor is an over-imaginative
>> Scientologist, yet not ONE other person on a.r.s. spoke up to say, uh
>> Tom, that's completely nuts. Not one. As for the Gerry Jihad, well, we
>> did a little better there: two whole people criticized his demented
>> ramblings. Jeff Jacobesn and Zinj.
>>
>> Where the hell were the rest of the supposed critics?
>
> <waves arms>
>
> scuse me!! what am i, chopped liver?

Wouldn't that make you pate? Oh, alright, you are utterly correct in
pointing out that you have, indeed, pointed out the lack of clothing on
Emperor Armstrong on many occasions. I didn't mean to suggest that only the
above mentioned posters had criticized his looniness; I was watching one
particular thread, where he went into a bizarre tirade about how using
violence against Scientology was "completely justified", to see who would
respond by saying, succinctly, lay off the crackpipe, Gerry. It's entirely
possible that not many people bothered to read it in the first place, of
course, since wading through a Gerry post requires considerable fortitude,
but he does have his self-proclaimed fans, so my comment was more directed
at those individuals, rather than a.r.s. as a whole.

Consider yourself exempted :) But my main point remains intact.

K

 
 

Thread

 

 

§  What's New  ||  Search   ||  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §