Date: 6 Nov 2003 04:57:02 -0000
Message-ID: <GYEM1O0D37930.9562731481@anonymous.poster>
From: Jurybox <Jurybox@solitary.sp.net>
Subject: Re: Yo Gerry ! Re Hate pages, unmerited lies
& stuff
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
References: <Xns942AE1F758856notemailthnx@203.59.27.131>
<la2iqvoebgjn11meu0ecaf3k4rfdrko6tr@4ax.com>
<lv3iqv8bdp8o80pndbhf5a4qjkntifiql7@4ax.com>
<r24iqvsmlb1ktpvd4dlves2k406gsd86l9@4ax.com>
<fd6iqv8j2ptnk34e30gunjcde075ond556@4ax.com>
<bobgm602tob@drn.newsguy.com>
Comments: This message probably did not originate at the above address.
It was automatically remailed by one or more anonymous remailers.
Please use abuse@dingoremailer.com to report abuse
X-Remailer-Contact: Anonymous Mailer <DingoAdmin@DingoRemailer.com>
X-Spam-Processed: dingoremailer.com, Wed, 05 Nov 2003 22:57:02 -0600
(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-Return-Path: dingobounce@dingoremailer.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: mail2news@dizum.com
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
Lines: 89
Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!in.100proofnews.com!in
.100proofnews.com!cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1655324
In article <bobgm602tob@drn.newsguy.com>
ladayla <ladayla_member@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>
> In article <fd6iqv8j2ptnk34e30gunjcde075ond556@4ax.com>, mimus says...
> >
> >On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:12:19 +0100, Gerry Armstrong
> ><gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 10:00:47 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>Like so many of the most valuable defector- critics, he's a little
> >>>bonkers from his experiences with "the most ethical people
on the
> >>>planet" (you and I would be, too).
> >>
> >>Oh, I almost forgot. Don't give specifics, and don't support your
low
> >>opinions, but make sure you express your low opinions if you have
or
> >>make an opportunity. Almost anyone can do it. It really doesn't take
> >>much thought.
> >
> >Calm down and re- read the sentence-- see the phrase "most valuable
> >defector- critics"? it's hardly dented by the gently joshing "a
little
> >bonkers", especially with the added explanation and observation.
> >
> >(BTW, putting "Cerridwen" on yer list is definitely bonkers--
relax.)
>
> That's your opinion. Isn't Cerridwen the one who said " guys like Warrior
are a
> dime a dozen"? I think that qualifies her for the Follies page. Statements
such
> as that are what are intended to nullify a person, to make nothing of them.They
> do SO serve OSA's purpose. It is also a hateful and hurtful thing to say.
Web pages such as Gerry's are "intended to nullify a person, to
make nothing of them." And unlike Usenet where a person can
respond to another, Gerry's nullification of others are on a
website where no one can defend themselves in an open manner. He
won't even discuss it on ARS beyond his arrogant tone. His site
serves "OSA's purpose." It's not only something OSA would do
it's something OSA does. I'd say his site is "hateful and
hurtful" to the many people who spend hours critiquing the COS.
He learned well while in Scientology.
> Fluffy
> has said that Warrior is " not worth speaking to". Gee, what do
you think about
> that?
In what context?
> I dunno what Cerriden has said to Gerry. I haven't read his 'Follies'
page.
What *do* you know? Why even bother getting involved in the
first place if you haven't read what is going on? Not reading
the follies page, or even glimpsing at it, says something sad
about your inability to deal with the issue at hand.
> I
> have just thought that he has a quirky sense of humor, but I am not on his
page.
Then I guess if you were on Gerry's page, the page you haven't
even viewed yet, the page that is the topic of discussion, then
you'd be against what Gerry is doing?
> If Cerridwen has made statements to/about Gerry that are comparable to
what she
> has said about Warrior, then she rightfully deserves to be quoted on Gerry's
> pages. That's my opinion.
You deserve to still be in Scientology. It's where people like
yourself belong. Where everything is positive, and anything
negative gets obliterated from thought. I am beginning to think
that Scientology creates mentally inferior people.
Plonk!!
--
"I do not believe in ... any of Scientology's absolutist
platitudes that attempt to reduce all of life and thought,
essentially complex activities, to a few simplistic functions
of a tiny handful of variables.
Dan Garvin, ex-Scientologist extraordinaire; after
25 years in the Sea Org he defines Scientology in
one sentence.
Xenu made me do it!