Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:10:01 -0500
Subject: Re: kids
From: Rebecca Hartong <firstname.lastname@example.org>
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Trace: 29 Oct 2003 14:09:18 -0500, 188.8.131.52
X-Original-Trace: 29 Oct 2003 14:09:18 -0500, 184.108.40.206
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1652976
On 10/29/03 11:20 AM, in article
> The attentive reader will notice that not only does Gerry try to draw
> parallel between someone critizing him on a USENET group and someone
> commiting perjury on the stand, accusing a lawyer of perfidious conduct in
> order to assist Scientology in having him disqualified from the case, and
> the case itself thrown out of court, but he actually suggests that the
> USENET criticism is "not nearly as vicious and false".
Oops! I think you meant to write that he actually suggests that the PERJURY
"is not nearly as vicious and false."
> Gerry, for the love of whatever God is acting as your second chair and
> chief witness today, get help. You are clearly utterly unable to comprehend
> the difference between a "lie" and a difference of opinion.
He's crazy! He's really crazy! I don't think there's probably any help
available for his kind of crazy, though.
"One unerring mark of the love of truth is not entertaining
any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is
built upon will warrant." --John Locke