Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 20:19:35 -0400
Subject: Re: Sayonawa for now
From: Rebecca Hartong <firstname.lastname@example.org>
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Trace: 25 Oct 2003 20:18:56 -0400, 126.96.36.199
X-Original-Trace: 25 Oct 2003 20:18:56 -0400, 188.8.131.52
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1651946
On 10/25/03 6:06 PM, in article email@example.com, "Ball
Fluff" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> "Rebecca Hartong" <email@example.com> wrote in
>> ---Incidentally, Gerry, in reference to this post, I don't believe I
>> saw your post providing evidence of your claim that "virtually all
>> Scientologists are criminals"--
> There is no such evidence because most Scientologists are not criminals.
> I include church members in this.
Of course you are almost certainly correct, Fluffy-one. Even though Gerry
states this as though it were a fact, it's very unlikely that there is
sufficient data available for drawing ANY conclusions about the criminality
of Scientologists as a group. I think we could kindly call his statement 'a
poorly phrased and unsupported ~opinion~.'
Gee, do you think post will make its way onto his web page as yet another
example of "lying, black propaganda, unmerited attacks and the refusal to
deal with these honestly and straight across..."?
"One unerring mark of the love of truth is not entertaining
any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is
built upon will warrant." --John Locke