Subject: Re: Gerry Armstrong and OSA: Separated at Birth??
From: Rebecca Hartong <email@example.com>
References: <Xns92C95F6E3CD07mirelesonicnet@126.96.36.199> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:55:02 GMT
X-Trace: news1.east.cox.net 1037656502 188.8.131.52 (Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:55:02
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:55:02 EST
Organization: Cox Communications
On 11/18/02 2:26 PM, in article email@example.com,
"Tilman Hausherr" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002
13:17:22 -0500, ptsc <ptsc AT nym DOT cryptofortress
> DOT com> wrote in <email@example.com>:
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:05:13 +0100, Tilman Hausherr <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:21:22 GMT, Deana Holmes <email@example.com>
>>> in <Xns92C95F6E3CD07mirelesonicnet@184.108.40.206>:
>>>> Let's see...now I have not one, but TWO hate pages! Gosh, I am
>>>> The first page (www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/holmes1.html)
>>>> compliments of our fave friends at the Office of Special Affairs,
>>>> Scientology. It's been up for a few years now.
>>>> The second page is from Gerry Armstrong, "profit" of
God. His page can be
>>>> found here:
>>>> You know, I never knew that so-called "critics" would
stoop to OSA tactics
>>>> to smear people like myself who are telling the hard truth about
>>> What "smear"?
>>> What "OSA tactic"?
>>> The page simply contains your own postings (aren't you proud of them?),
>>> plus a cartoon with you dancing. I didn't know your legs go that
>>> That picture is a nice piece of art.
>> If capitalizing the letters "OSA" in "goOnSquAd follies"
is not supposed to
>> imply some connection to OSA by the people on the page, then exactly
>> what is it supposed to imply?
> I'd say it implies a similarity, a parallel to OSA methods. This applies
> to you pretty well, considering your Gandow security check attempt.
> Compare your questions to OSA's questions (webbed on GA's page).
You may have noticed, Tilman,
that Gerry has included a post of mine also on
his page. If you read it, you will see that it is barely insulting towards
him and--in fact--is directed at Deana and her quarrel with Gerry, telling
her that I think the whole thing (her side of it and his) is silly.
I'm curious whether you
find that post of mine to be "similar, a parallel to
OSA methods" and, if so, how?
I don't know whether Gerry's
intention is to compare the people he quotes to
OSA and, frankly, I don't care. I do think though it's, at the very least,
*weird* that anyone would go to the effort he's gone to collect these posts
and put them up on a web page.