Subject: Re: CLairification of Fraud (was re: TECH Ouside COS.
OT 1 Success)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:44:52 -0600
Organization: Lightlink Internet
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
X-Original-Trace: 2 Dec 2002 15:40:31 -0500, 126.96.36.199
<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:57:35 -0600, "Fluffygirl"
> <email@example.com> wrote:
(Cerri says I don't snip
> Claire's response
is to snip, avoid and, as Hubbard directed, attack,
> and attack, to deny her attacks, and then attack some more.
> I have been very specific about addressing one specific fraudulent
> representation, that auditing raises IQ a point per hour. Claire's
> responses demonstrate the fraud. They are dishonest and inane.
> Scientology is an extant criminal fraud, and every person who says
> Scientology works promotes that criminal fraud. Some more knowingly
> than others.
I've no interest in whether
or not Scn raises IQ points per hour or on any
basis, and I've said so. Most non CofS Scn'ists don't worry about that sort
of thing. In fact, Hubbard never said it was to be taken as being that way
100% of the time, in any case, so churchies don't really worry about that
It's an issue for you,
but it's not an issue for me.
You've tried to make it
one, in effect, attempting to cram it down my
throat, but I'm just not having any.