http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3dd97a7f%40news2.lightlink.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
From: "Fluffygirl"
<amafluffygirl@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Gerry Armstrong and OSA: Separated at Birth??
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:43:35 -0600
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <3dd97a7f@news2.lightlink.com>
References: <Xns92C95F6E3CD07mirelesonicnet@208.201.224.154> <3dd90005.160998393@news.prodigy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.16.34.12
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.154.124.234
X-Original-Trace: 18 Nov 2002 18:40:47 -0500, 172.154.124.234
"Have A Cow"
<acow@acow.com> wrote in message
news:3dd90005.160998393@news.prodigy.net...
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:21:22 GMT, Deana Holmes <mirele@sonic.net>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >You know, I never knew that so-called "critics" would stoop
to OSA
tactics
> >to smear people like myself who are telling the hard truth about their
> >antics.
>
> As expected Deanna Holmes lies yet again.
>
> Deanna Holmes herself smeared Bob Minton with a bogus blackmail
> accusation. She knew the accusation was bogus because she reported it
> to ars instead of to the FBI which would have taken such an accusation
> seriously. I hope Bob Minton sues her mercilessly for her bogus
> blackmail accusation.
>
> But perhaps Deanna Holmes was telling an "acceptable truth" above,
in
> which case Deanna Holmes is admitting that she is not a critic or
> so-called critic at all, but is instead an OSA operative. This
> wouldn't surprise me.
Ah. So she ~should~ be
on a webpage slandering her. (Is it libel in the
internet as it is in regular print media?) Whatever.
C
|