From: ExScn <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Another of Armstrong's lies
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <24160-3DF39630email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy! - Test our service with our FREE
trial at https://www.easynews.com/trial/trial.phtml
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise
we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 16:20:11 GMT
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 12:57:52 -0600 (CST), firstname.lastname@example.org
>Date: Sat, Dec
7, 2002, 11:59pm (CST-2) From: email@example.com (Warrior)
>>The web pages came about because of
>> the attacks on Gerry's credibility by
>> persons like Deana. There are others
>> who routinely mischaracterized Gerry as
>> a "loon" and a "kook" and a "false profit"
>> and "delusional" OFF OF a.r.s. long
>> before it was ~apparent~ (visible) ON
>Hey I never "criticized" Gerry Armstrong until recently after
>atttacking me for asking if he could/would tell us about the Minton
>Swiss checks he received. Then I posted that his webpage on Garry
>Scarff was stupid and a waste of time that could better be used on
>information about COS. Most of the people on his goOn SquAd list only
>said his "webpage" on Scarff was a bad idea before he started
>No matter how you, Lerma, Armstrong and his girlfriend try to spin
>it......most of the people were put on Armstrong's webpage because they
>disagreed with his doing such a webpage.
This is 100% correct.
I went back to the first post from Gerry re
Scarff and read ALL the follow-ups.
Tigger, was quite courteous and even respectful -
they were acting as friends would do when they see someone about to do
has been quite insane, IMHO.