Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:10:17 +0100
From: edo <nobody@cryptorebels.net>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <edo-admin@cryptorebels.net>.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Gerry Armstrong makes me an "Operative"
References: <3FB1ADA6.83BABE43@aol.com>
<epr3rvcfioqsaf6miot1548ds56hpibep0@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <ab7972e3b27f9bc77902f5fd20ee1b37@cryptorebels.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
Lines: 72
Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!news.mv.net!newsreader.
wustl.edu!unlnews.unl.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.
edu!cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1656676
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote:
>Would you be willing to dialog with me?
No.
>I ask that because the people whose posts I've webbed that you
>denigrate as my "hobby" refuse to dialog concerning the facts and
>causes underlying my web page.
Would you be willing to dialog with Mike Rinder concerning the facts and
causes underlying OSA web pages?
>So would you be willing to dialog?
So no, I wouldn't.
>This dialog will not be to decide whether the posters whose messages
>I've webbed are evil or whether I'm suppressive. It will be to
>consider why there is such a gap between how both sides see the same
>thing. Why do I really web these posts?
Because you're dense.
Why do they really believe
>and act as they do toward me?
Because you're dense.
Can anything be done to deal with the
>causes of this opposition/misunderstanding/whatever you want to call
>it?
I want it call it your stupidity. Yes, something can be done about it.
Stop being so dense.
If nothing else comes of it, at least I think we'd both have a
>better understanding of the other side.
>
>So what do you say? Are you willing to dialog?
No.
>If so, since it's Martin's attacks that give rise to this little web
>page of his posts, and your "wish" that I "get another hobby,"
perhaps
>we can start by dialoguing about his definition for the English phrase
>"to serve a purpose," or "to serve someone's purpose,"
or "to serve an
>organization's purpose."
I've got better and more interesting things to do. Like filing my nails.
Vacuuming the house.
>His misdefinition or redefinition of this term on the surface at least
>provides the basis for his continuing attack, and perhaps if you and I
>dialogued about what this term actually means his basis for his
>continuing attacks can be elminated.
No. You'd have to eliminate your being dense to do that.
>If our dialog is successful with this tiny matter of Martin's attacks,
>perhaps we can move on to what I see are other baseless attacks by
>a.r.s. participants.
You're too dense to move on. You would have moved on long ago if you
weren't. But here you still are putting up more stupid pages. Still
making an idiot of yourself. Losing more and more of whatever respect some
people may have had for you.
>So, shall we dialog?
No, we shall not dialog.