Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:36:00 -0600
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Diane Richardson)
Subject: Re: For Gerry Armstrong
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:35:54 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
On 20 Dec 2002 18:19:21 GMT, email@example.com (JimDBB) wrote:
>I have to agree
to disagree with you, Garry.
>At least you have not accessed and posted Gerry's private and personal
>information but Diane Richardson has.
What? The information
I posted comes from Gerry Armstrong's own
website, for crying out loud! Look at the URL at the top of the post!
>If you will notice
the ease and facility which which she accesses and posts
>private and personal legal information on Gerry ( and others).
Because Gerry Armstrong
created a website and placed that information
on it. That makes it quite easy for anyone to access, including you,
Jim Beebe, if you had enough functioning brain cells left to do so.
>She is doing
>this from her workplace at the psychiatric history library.
No I'm not. I am
posting from home, just as you are.
>of course, the computer setup wherein she can access and easily move
files"? You're hallucinating, Jim.
wants you to think that she is not doing
>this from her workplace. But it is quite obvious that she is.
I am doing it from
home. I am posting from my personal internet
account. You've continued making false accusations like this
for years, Jim.
would certainly have cause to sue Diane Richardson's employer
>for the harassment emanating from an employee while at work in the employer's
You are downright
delusional, Jim. Check and make sure your canisters
are marked "oxygen" and not "nitrous oxide."