07 Dec 2002 00:33:11 -0600
From: email@example.com (Diane Richardson)
Subject: Re: ~Re: Kady O'Malley harasses, endangers female lawyer
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 06:33:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 05:42:46 GMT, "Magoo" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>"Diane Richardson" <email@example.com> wrote in message
>> On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 22:54:05 GMT, "Magoo" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> >And your point is...they should just lay back and leave this slander
>> No, I was asking you if you recommend that people who object to the
>> Gerroline Unit's DA page contact their ISP to complain. Is that what
>> you're recommending?
>Actually I'm unfamiliar with "Gerroline Unit DA page"...so please
>address for me to go visit. I never mentioned that,,,you did.
Gerry Armstong and his
current girlfriend, whose posts are so similar
I find it much simpler to refer to them as the Gerroline Unit -- just
as they refer to other couples as "units" -- have changed the title
of that page so often I'm afraid I can't direct you to it anymore.
It's what the Gerroline
Unit formerly referred to as the GoOn SquAd
Follies page. I have no idea what their wriggling and squirming has
done its title recently, but no doubt you can find it at the Gerroline
Unit's website, www.armstrong.org (I think that's it)
who you find fault with, over and over, since I arrived here,
>> >Diane R.
>> Actually, I was asking to find out if you hold one set of standards
>> for critics and another set of standards for scientologists. You've
>> proven with you reply that you do.
>That's not true at all.
>They said they're writing
WHO says they are writing
Kady's ISP? Are you referring to Helena
Kobrin? What you read was a repost by an anonymous coward of
something that was posted years ago. I guess you're just confused
once again. You appear to be easily confused.
>All I did was
>say that's a good idea....re their very own slander.
Who is this "they"
you keep referring to? You would make it much
easier if you would be more specific about who you are talking about.
>You are the one adding
>words to it, to fit your image of how supposedly bad I am. I've never been
>to this site you mention.
I see I mistook your stupidity
for hypocrisy. I apologize. You're
not a hypocrite, you're just incredibly dumb.
>Typical of you, Diane.
Yes, and I'd say you current
confusion is so typical of you
it's become a trademark.
>> >Thanks once
again...for showing who you really are.
>> And thanks for showing the world what a bald-faced hypocrite you
>> are, Tory.
>Call me whatever name you want....no matter what I do, any day, any time,
>you'll find fault with it, and that my dear is the fact, over and over.
Perhaps if you tried a
little harder it wouldn't be so easy to find
fault with what you write.
>Plain and simple....and
oh yea..you'll have a "True" reason for finding it.
Finding what? Your brain?
>My sympathies ...and
Don't use an apostrophe
when you are writing a plural. Apostrophes
are added to the possessive, but not to the plural form of a noun.
Most people learn that in the 3rd or 4th grade. I guess you never
quite made it that far.
And Happy Holidays to you!!!!!!!!
I'm sure we'll all hear all about
them from you!!!!!! :-)