06 Dec 2002 08:43:26 -0600
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Diane Richardson)
Subject: Re: Gerry Armstrong: Bald-faced liar
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 14:43:28 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 13:56:22 GMT, email@example.com
(arnie lerma - www.lermanet.com) wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Dec 2002
13:46:11 GMT, firstname.lastname@example.org (Diane Richardson)
>>On 6 Dec 2002 01:17:58 -0800, Warrior <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>I'll not again email Deana Holmes since she has demonstrated that
>>>will post private email to a.r.s., as is shown below in her post with
>>>I also wish to comment publicly that I feel much of the current hate
>>>being directed at Gerry could have been avoided if a few individuals
>>>(and I'm talking about critics) could have communicated through email,
>>>*and* kept their profanity and insults out of the exchange.
>>>Note in the exchange below, and in subsequent postings, Gerry asked
>>>Deana questions via email. She didn't bother to reply, saying, quite
>>>irrationally to Gerry, "Gerry, I see no reason to answer your
>>>I don't think you're interested in answers" *after*, and in response
>>>to, Gerry's very courteous and *sincere* questions. Instead, she not
>>>only posted his very private email to a.r.s. (!), but stated in a
>>>related posting, "I have been told that you are delusional and
>>>I should excuse your lying on that basis."
>>>I think Deana is hiding an unknown source of black PR.
snip, cut to the chase
>>It looks to me that you are the one who has convinced himself of the
>>truth of the Gerroline Unit's lies, deceit and deception, Warrior.
>>Why am I not surprised?
> because it is the pose of the straw man
Why waste your time on
something you do so poorly, Lerma? Go
lick some more stamps. You're much better at that than you are