§ Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact §




NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 06:48:25 -0600
From: referen@bway.net (Diane Richardson)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Even more Questions to factless ptsc
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:48:38 GMT
Message-ID: <3ddb83b8.6963623@news.bway.net>
References: <3DD77414.3040605@dialogzentrum.de>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 60
X-Trace: sv3-MMvI1p2nRLneddAHSp/o+LEEHZrjFK9ZJnfYGARA
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bway.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@bway.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1

On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:00:10 GMT, "Gandalf" <BasicQuestions@yahoo.com>

>"kEvin" <me@manual-override.com> wrote in message
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:53:08 +0100, Thomas Gandow
>> <gandow@dialogzentrum.de> wrote:
>> [skipping over 100's of lines in dozens of posts in this thread]
>> >ptsc wrote:

>> >> Yes, it is. And once again, you refuse to answer any questions of you
>> >> while hypocritically demanding them of me. Quite simply, I asked
>> [...]
>> >> Once again I repeat just a few of them.

>> >> A) Why did Ursula Caberta not speak at Leipzig this year?
>> >> B) Was Ursula Caberta planning to speak at Leipzig this year?
>> >> C) Was the proposed topic of her speech Bob Minton's flip-flop?
>> >> D) Did she tell Pastor Thomas Gandow about her intended topic?
>> >> E) Did Pastor Thomas Gandow then axe her speech?
>> As some of the URL's finally posted show, Ursula Caberta did appear at
>> Leipzig and read the award proclamation.
>> Why Gandow has refused to answer those questions when a simple 'no'
>> would have cleared this up is a complete mystery to me.
>Why people don't realize that Gandow has no obligation to answer questions
>put forth by others on ARS amazes me.

What makes you think people don't realize that? I think just about
everyone here acknowledges that fact.

>What's particularly bizarre is that the lack of answers is being interpreted
>as indicating "guilt" on some level.

I don't think it's bizarre at all. What's bizarre is that rather than
Gandow forthrightly stating "I will not answer your questions," he
goes into a frenzy of accusations, insinuations, and feints. That's
not only weird, it's downright Scientological.

>It's kangaroo court. It's a sick process and a sick precedent.

I think Gandow and Armstrong are both really sick.

>P.S.: Were I Gandow, I would have streamlined this whole procedure: "No I
>won't answer your questions. Have a nice day."

Isn't is a shame he mimics the CoS rather than you?

Diane Richardson




§ Legal Archive || Wog Media || Cult Media || CoW ® || Writings || Fun || Disclaimer || Contact §