Subject: Re: Questions for Deana - was Re: Gerry Armstrong...
From: Deana Holmes <email@example.com>
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <Xns92BDE0285EF7Cmirelesonicnet@18.104.22.168>
Organization: Scientology Killed Lisa McPherson
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 00:14:41 GMT
X-Trace: typhoon.sonic.net 1039220081 22.214.171.124 (Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:14:41
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:14:41 PST
Warrior <email@example.com> wrote in news:firstname.lastname@example.org:
If you think after all
the CRAP I got from Gerry I'm going to answer
questions from you, Warrior, think again. As far as I can see, you're
operating on a.r.s as a very interested friend for Gerry. Since you have
such a close connection, I see no reason to indulge you *or* Gerry.
P.S. You might suggest
to Gerry that he could possibly improve his
reputation on a.r.s (from "wacky loon who sees every disagreement with him
as emanating from OSA" to mere "wacky loon") by getting him to
spurious OSA page. There's no reason for most of the people on that page to
be on his stupid list (with the exception of Keith Wyatt). But I doubt you
have the *guts* to do that.
(c) Deana M. Holmes, 2002.
All Rights Reserved, worldwide. No reprint
without permission of Deana M. Holmes. If Reverend Gandow (aka Grabdough)
lets you put this on your website, Gerry, I'll make more than a token
effort to find out who Grabdough's superiors are, because you are violating
my copyright. There.