From: Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Cerridwen)
Subject: Re: kids
Comments: This message probably did not originate at the above address.
X-Remailer-Contact: Anonymous Mailer <DingoAdmin@DingoRemailer.com>
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we
will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 02:29:05 GMT
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1650870
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Cerridwen) wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Gerry Armstrong <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
><snippity do dah>
>>How in the world does "mak[ing] a specific point *to* the" victim
>>the crime excuse, justify or ameliorate the crime? It doesn't. Your
>>reasoning is BS.
>>And worse, I believe that by your "logic" you are defending
>>advocating hate crimes.
>Accusing someone critical of them as advocating hate crimes.
>Now where have I seen this before?
>>>Gerry's own theory we can't prove it wasn't Gerry who wrote the anonymous
>>This is false. But it is also just another BS "reason" for you
>>justify this malicious forgery. Not only was the malicious forgery
>>done *to* me to make a specific point, but, anyway, I had, you're
>>sure, a faulty theory. Ergo, I may be injured by any means by anyone
>>without any discipline of the person doing the injuring. Where have I
>>seen *that* reasoning before?
>Hubbard didn't like it either. He thought that people who were poking
>fun at him were really trying to injure him.
>>>But yeah, in general I think can be a bad thing.
>>Like if the victimizing wasn't done to make a specific point *to* the
>>very person being victimized, right?
>You really need to knock of this Scn victim shit. l think you might start
>feeling better as soon as you do. They didn't come after you and
>fuck with you because you quietly walked away. And NO, I am not advocating
>quietly walking away. I applaud you that you stood up to them and told
>them to kiss your ass. But it seems to me, if you are going to take them
>on like you have, then you should know and be ready to deal with the
>amount of crap they are going to try on you to stop you.
I don't think that it's at all sane to then whine and cry about being a victim.
You know what a viscious, vindictive, rotten stinking piece of shit this
Church really is.
>know that they will do anything, and I mean anything to stop you. Every critic
>here knows it. So don't whine about being victimized.
>You gonna play with the big boys, you gonna get hurt.
>And due to your "victimization" you act like a kook and set
>up an OSA goon squad page and link to it any critic that
>is critical of YOU.
>I have no idea what makes you think that you are above criticism. But
>let me assure you, you are not. NO ONE is.
>"Critical thinking demands we question the unproven, not that
>we meekly accept it." Diane Richardson
>For Stats on Scn go to: http://www.truthaboutscientology.com/stats/
>For News on Scientology go to: http://www.scientologywatch.org