From: StilllovingMarty@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,fr.soc.sectes
Subject: Re: Armstrong's Settlement Conference Statement, Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
Date: 2 Apr 2004 09:29:43 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 115
Message-ID: <bf456302.0404020929.70b825a9@posting.google.com>
References: <4u0k60l9jgaglaea7pkgmh3rq2tv9v6ai9@4ax.com> <eddd254a.0403311109.7c677410@posting.google.com>
<c4f7nj0ibb@drn.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.127.246.80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1080926983 17316 127.0.0.1 (2 Apr 2004 17:29:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:29:43 +0000 (UTC)
Path: news2.lightlink.com!news.lightlink.com!wasp.rahul.net!205.215.62.125.MISMATCH!in.1
00proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1693306 fr.soc.sectes:68048

From: Martyisirresistable@emailaccount.com (Barbara Schwarz)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,fr.soc.sectes
Subject: Re: Armstrong's Settlement Conference Statement, Scientology
v.
Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
References: <4u0k60l9jgaglaea7pkgmh3rq2tv9v6ai9@4ax.com>
<eddd254a.0403311109.7c677410@posting.google.com>
<c4f7nj0ibb@drn.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.127.246.160
Message-ID: <eddd254a.0404010928.7ccf19e0@posting.google.com>

Warrior <warrior@xenu.ca> wrote in message
news:<c4f7nj0ibb@drn.newsguy.com>...

I read several of your postings, "Warrior", and came to the conclusion
that you base your knowledge about L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology
rather upon German psychiatric black propaganda than the facts and the
truth. That is why I read your postings with the necessary suspicion.

> In article <eddd254a.0403311109.7c677410@posting.google.com>,
> Barbara Schwarz says...
> >
> >Copied from the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org
> >
> > GERALD ARMSTRONG (cont.)
> >In addition to his unlawful activities, Armstrong's mental stability
> >is questionable. Armstrong once posted a message on the Internet
> >concerning a letter he sent to Saddam Hussein during the Gulf War.
> >In the letter, he offered himself to Hussein as a hostage in the
Iraqi
> >war. "If either side failed to perform any part of the agreement, the
> >other side could execute me," he concluded. Armstrong makes clear
> >in his posting that he did not think the letter to Hussein was a joke,
> >but was deadly serious. He quite proudly republishes it and other
> >similar writings from time to time. To further demonstrate how out
> >of touch he is with reality, Armstrong had himself photographed by
> >a newspaper naked while holding a globe to promote his theories of
> >destroying all money.
>
> The photo of Gerry wearing running shorts while embracing a globe was
> formerly on one of the cult's black PR hate pages. In webbing the
Marin
> Independent Journal's photo which was taken by Frank Frost, the cult
> violated the copyrights of the newspaper.

Many of the anti-Scientology extremists violated the copyrights of
Scientology. Gerry Armstrong stole Scientology documents (planted or
not, I don't go in there at the moment) and this material and OT
material is published just about everywhere. How can Scientology
haters claim that their copyright is violated when just a photo of a
guy is re-published? We speaking about a double moral here, right?

>
> Gerry wasn't physically naked when he was photographed for the article.

How do you know? Where you present? Is there an affidavit, except from
Gerry, the liar? (He also published wrongfully that I am a David
Miscavige operation!)

> The cult knows Gerry was wearing a pair of running shorts because
their
> private investigator Eugene Ingram interviewed the photographer Frank
> Frost a few days after the article and photo appeared in the paper.

Even if he would be just half naked, what is the matter with that guy?
Why can't he put a shirt on? Does he thinks he is so beautiful naked
or what?

> Gerry
> protested to Mike Rinder during a meeting in 1994 that he wasn't nude
in
> the photo and that Scientology knew he wasn't. Rinder acknowledged
this
> and in fact acknowledged that what Scientology was doing to Gerry was
> black PR. Rinder also said that they were going to continue to black
PR
> Gerry until he was silenced.

You just refer me to Gerry, but he is a liar. Where are the affidavits
by trustworthy people hereto? Gerry also seems being otherwise a sex
nuts case, trying to subvert a Scientologist using sexual enticement.

Gerald has connections to a "deprogrammer" and probably not just one?
How more disgusting and lawless can it get?

And what is the nutty stuff wanting to destroy all the money in the
world and becomming the hostage of Saddam Hussein? If he is lucky, he
can share a cell with him now.

Barbara Schwarz

Copied from the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org

GERALD ARMSTRONG (cont.)
As part of the same scheme, Armstrong planned to subvert a senior
Scientology executive using sexual enticement in a scheme he titled
"Operation Long Prong." This is documented both in his own handwriting
and on video.

Since fleeing California, Armstrong, a native Canadian, has lived in
British Columbia, Canada, and appears to have no gainful employment.
Yet he has somehow managed to travel all over the world in pursuit of
his hate agenda.

In 2000, Armstrong traveled to Europe to attend an anti-religious
conference in Leipzig, Germany.

In 2001, Armstrong traveled extensively in Europe, joining in a hate
march in France with extremist Roger Gonnet and visiting
anti-religious groups in Russia and Denmark. At a meeting of hate
groups in Russia, Armstrong met with deprogramming proponent Alexander
Dvorkin.

[ Page 1 ] [ Page 2 ] [ Page 3 ] [ Documents ]