http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8385d874.0308210752.3f0dafd1%40posting.google.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
From: BarbaraSchwarz@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: http://home.tampabay.rr.com/sp/FLA.html
Date: 21 Aug 2003 08:52:54 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 237
Message-ID: <8385d874.0308210752.3f0dafd1@posting.google.com>
References: <8385d874.0308190904.29887739@posting.google.com> <CGM0b.687$nA5.135963@dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net>
<8385d874.0308201339.31d054f4@posting.google.com> <e1dc520d.0308201918.76ca952a@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.127.246.67
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1061481175 6180 127.0.0.1 (21 Aug 2003 15:52:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Aug 2003 15:52:55 GMT
thud_n_blunder@my-deja.com (Thud-n-Blunder) wrote in message news:<e1dc520d.0308201918.76ca952a@posting.google.com>...
> BarbaraSchwarz@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message news:<8385d874.0308201339.31d054f4@posting.google.com>...
> > "Feisty" <sunny@skytoday.com> wrote in message news:<CGM0b.687$nA5.135963@dca1-nnrp1.news.algx.net>...
> > > Barbara Schwarz <BarbaraSchwarz@excite.com> wrote in message
> > > news:8385d874.0308190904.29887739@posting.google.com...
> > > (SNIP)
> > >
> > > "OPERATIONS OFFICER
> >
> > Sigh, why do you post that Scientology infiltrator stuff below, Arnie
> > Lerma, Anti-Feist? And what has this to do with that Jeff Jacobsen
> > worked in a psychiatric institution that messed people up? Should that
> > posting below distract from crimes within psychiatry, Arnie, you
> > "deprogramming"-fan?
> >
> > Is Jeff not man enough to defend himself? Does he needs you to defend
> > him?
> >
> >
> > Barbara Schwarz
> >
>
> So, tell me, Barbara - is the information posted incorrect? Did LRH
> never write them? Were they never part of the policies of the Church
> of Scientology?
>
> Thud
It's a real mixed bag, as far as I can see. Typically Arnie Lerma, the
Anti-Feist of who it is said he has smelly feets. (You let some people
come really close to you, don't you, Arnaldo?)
What I am sure L. Ron Hubbard said is that if you are attacked you are
not just taking it, but that you have to fight back. What I know a 100
% that he said is that the price of freedom is the constantly
willingness to fight back. In other words: L. Ron Hubbard was very
very wise, but never criminal.
I don't have the time to go through the salad of stuff in details that
confused Arnaldo attached to this thread after his electro-schocks,
but I remind you that I said over and over that the Church of
Scientology is secretly infiltrated by non-Scientologists, (those guys
that were once in SCN, but don't want to be apostates)that made a lot
of stuff up. Most of the stuff below is not by L. Ron Hubbard. Ask
Gerry Armstrong, Jesse Prince and others for the details.
Barbara Schwarz
>
>
> > >
> > > "Successful:
> > > - When hitting a group or individual, hitting their finance and
comm
> > > lines.
> > > - Getting an enemy to attack another enemy.
> > >
> > > "Unsuccessful:
> > > - When planning not considering all the effects as the Op runs
it's full
> > > course, and not taking the enemy's viewpoint, leaving critical
holes in
> > > the plan which will later backfire on you, make your scramble on
an
> > > emergency basis to handle or make the Op less effective.
> > > - Manufacturing documented enemy crimes (there are rare exceptions
to
> > > this)
> > >
> > > ----
> > >
> > > "DATA NEEDED BY OPS ON EACH LOCATED WHO
> > >
> > > "- Criminal background of terminal.
> > > - Financial involvements (inflow & outflow of money)
> > > - Legal involvements (summary of actions)
> > > - What persons have the power to fire terminal from the position
he holds.
> > > - Any rules or regulations that if broken would cause the terminal
to lose
> > > his job/position.
> > >
> > > "Stay away from harassment actions that are only for the sake
of doing
> > > channels or revenge. ie: Sending pizzas from every Pizza delivery
> > > restaurant. These basically have been unsuccessful as they do not
achieve
> > > any real effective result, except for letting the WHO know that
he is
> > > under attack. There may be times when 50 pizzas every day being
sent to a
> > > WHO would be effective, but this would be in such a case where
the WHO was
> > > restimulated heavily by seeing pizzas, smelling pepperoni or seeing
pizza
> > > delivery boys, etc.
> > >
> > > "Ensure proper security is planned in an operation, ie: use
of an
> > > untraceable typewriter, paper without fingerprints, proper covers
by
> > > FSM's, etc. (See security write-up and security section data in
hat
> > > materials of Ops US hat checksheet)
> > >
> > > "A believable source must be provided in an operation, thereby
'filling
> > > the vacuum,' so that Scientology isn't dubbed in as source of the
attack.
> > > A1 Ops are planned in such a way that they in no way could be traced
back
> > > to the Church."
> > >
> > > ----
> > >
> > > "HCO POLICY LETTER OF 25 APRIL 1968
> > >
> > > "The maxim is .. 'when under attack .. attack'. The point
is .. even if
> > > you don't have enough data to win the case .. still attack .. LOUDLY.
> > > Reason is, it is only those people that have crimes that will attack
us,
> > > and they will soon back off for fear of being found out when attacked
> > > back."
> > >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > "CONFIDENTIAL
> > > Industrial Intelligence Text Note
> > >
> > > "The Officer should not be an Scn but a pro.
> > >
> > > "The US trained lots of them so they are available as they
also released
> > > lots of them.
> > >
> > > "The trick is to get an unemployed ex Intelligence Officer,
metered for
> > > total reliability."
> > >
> > > ----
> > >
> > > "2 Dec 69
> > > INTELLIGENCE ACTIONS COVERT INTELLIGENCE DATA COLLECTION
> > >
> > > "Essentially a covert operation is intended to embarrass,
discredit or
> > > overthrow or remove an actual or possible opponent.
> > >
> > > "It is a small war carried on without its true source being
disclosed.
> > >
> > > "The enemy propaganda tactic is to print bad things, repeat
them in
> > > another country, repeat them back, get them into articles and then
into
> > > books. This builds a background of ill repute. This builds a 'library
of
> > > public opinion'. This has happened to us.
> > >
> > > "The enemy objective is to discredit, in our case, and then
build on this
> > > a denial of rights under law. Their first bad articles were the
New York
> > > Times Sunday magazine section in mid 1950. Their first blast was
the San
> > > Francisco papers, Sept 1950, quoting the publisher Ceppos being
critical
> > > of me (he was a Communist, publisher of Book One) followed by the
LA
> > > papers, pushed then by the Sara Komkovadamanov (alias Northrup)
'divorce'
> > > actions, followed by attempted kidnapping of myself. Other details
were
> > > pushed into it including murder of four and so on. This was a full
> > > complete covert operation. At the back of it was Miles Hollister
> > > (psychology student) Sara Komkosadamanov (housekeeper at the place
nuclear
> > > physicists stayed near Caltech) Gene Benton and his wife - secretary
of
> > > the Young Communists League. The FBI approached in December 1950
and asked
> > > what Communists were in our orgs, said they could not give it out
but
> > > asked for a list of all staff saying they would give us back those
who
> > > were not. 252 out or 1000 were struck off the list by the FBI."
> > >
> > > ----
> > >
> > > "Written for the Guardian and her offices.
> > > ETHICS ORDER
> > > TO: THOSE CONCERNED September 17, 1965
> > >
> > > "I. J. F. 'Jack' Horner is hereby declared a Suppressive Person
for
> > > reasons herewith given:
> > >
> > > "(a) Using and giving altered 'Standard Scientology Technology'
aimed at
> > > "doing someone in". The public is warned not to accept
any processing
> > > and/or training from Horner or anyone, I repeat, anyone connected
with
> > > him. What he is using is not, I repeat, not Scientology Technology.
(b)
> > > For his association with J. Edgar Watson, a known thief (fired
from Saint
> > > Hill for this reason) and a sex pervert recently declared a Suppressive
> > > Person by L. Ron Hubbard.
> > >
> > > "II. Not to be trained or processed.
> > > III. Not to be communicated with.
> > > IV. Declared FAIR GAME."
> > >
> > > ----
> > >
> > > "HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 SEPTEMBER 1965
> > > CENTRAL FILES SECTION
> > >
> > > "The prime purpose of the Central Files Section is:
> > >
> > > "'TO HELP RON COLLECT AND HOLD ALL NAMES, ADDRESSES, PERTINENT
DATA ABOUT AND
> > > CORRESPONDENCE TO ANYONE FROM ANYONE WHO HAS EVER BOUGHT ANYTHING
FROM THE
> > > ORGANIZATION.'"
> > >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > "Policy of Freedom and Pamphlet Publications in the U.S.
> > >
> > > "As 49% in the U.S. favor Freedom (of Speech, Religion, Press)
and the
> > > largest percents are government and hypocrisy, the formula for
Freedom in
> > > the U.S. is
> > >
> > > "CLAIM CREDIT FOR ADVANCES IN REESTABLISHING FREEDOM IN THE
USE AND PUSH ACTIONS
> > > TO DO SO AND CLAIM CREDIT FOR UNMASKING GOVERNMENT HYPOCRISY AND
ACT TO DO SO."
> > >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > PR SERIES 24
> > > HANDLING HOSTILE CONTACTS/DEAD AGENTING
> > >
> > > "The errors we have made have been:
> > > 1. Defending only.
> > > 2. Defending on Scientology ground.
> > > 3. Being reasonable and assigning mild motives to the enemy.
> > > 4. Failing to attack early and hard.
> > > 5. Undervaluing the broad social value of Scientology."
> > >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > "HCO ETHICS ORDER
> > > FROM: ETHICS OFFICER WW 29th December 1969
> > > SUBJECT: JOHN McMASTER - WRIT OF EXPULSION
> > >
> > > "1. John McMaster, parishioner of 3, Carlisle Crescent, Durban,
South
> > > Africa, is on this date duly expelled from the Church of Scientology
for
> > > the following reason:
> > >
> > > "PLACING HIMSELF IN A POSITION OF BLACKMAIL WITH HOMOSEXUAL
RELATIONS."
> > >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > "HCO Ethics Order
> > > To: Those concerned Date: 29 June 1965
> > >
> > > "I. RALPH GLASER is declared a Suppressive Person for the
following
> > > reasons:
> > >
> > > "A. He failed to handle or to disconnect from his wife as
ordered by
> > > Natalie Fisher on May 5, 1965. By his own testimony, 'The more
I gain the
> > > more she matters,' his wife is Suppressive to him; three weeks
elapsed
> > > from the time of the order from Natalie until his next interview
with
> > > Ethics, which might have been construed as rescinding Natalie's
order.
> > >
> > > "B. He has repeatedly done the Crime of heckling Scientology
instructor or
> > > lecturer."
> > >
> > > ==
> > >
> > > http://home.tampabay.rr.com/sp/FLA.html